目的 研究护理干预对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者抑郁焦虑情绪的效果。方法 选取2015年2月—2017年3月我院收治的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者84例为观察对象。2015年2月—2016年2月入院患者42例为对照组,遵医嘱给予治疗,同时均予以常规慢性阻塞性肺疾病知识宣教。2016年3月—2017年3月入院患者42例为观察组在对照组基础上予以优质护理干预。分别比较干预前后两组患者抑郁、焦虑及干预前后肺功能变化、患者满意度、生活质量。结果 干预后观察组抑郁自评量表(SDS)、焦虑自评量表(SAS)评分分别为(20.05±5.24)分、(21.57±6.03)分,均低于对照组(28.57±5.29)分、(31.72±6.14)分,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。干预后观察组FEV1水平(2.00±0.33)L,高于对照组的(1.68±0.25)L、观察组FEV1/FVC水平分别为(69.50±7.95)%,高于对照组的(65.18±8.43)%,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。观察组患者满意度为95.24%(40/42),高于对照组的73.81%(31/42),差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。观察组患者各项SF-36评分均高于对照组,均P＜0.05差异有统计学意义。结论 优质护理干预可缓解患者负性情绪,改善肺功能,提高满意度及生活质量。

Objective To study effects of nursing intervention in paitents with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Methods 84 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease admitted to our hospital from February 2015 to March 2017 were selected as the observation objects. From February 2015 to February 2016, 42 patients admitted to the control group were treated with conventional therapy. From March 2016 to March 2017, 42 patients admitted to the hospital as the observation group were given quality nursing intervention on the basis of the control group. The depression, anxiety, lung function changes, patient satisfaction and quality of life before and after intervention were compared between the two groups before and after intervention. Results After the intervention, the SDS and SAS scores of the observation group were (20.05±5.24), (21.57±6.03), which were lowered than that of the control group (28.57±5.29), (31.72±6.14), the difference was statistical significance (P<0.05). After intervention, the level of FEV1 in the observation group (2+0.33) L was higher than that in the control group (1.68+0.25) L, and the FEV1/FVC level in the observation group was (69.50+7.95)%, which was higher than that in the control group (65.18+8.43)%,the difference was statistical significance (P<0.05). Satisfaction of patients in the observation group was 95.24% (40/42), higher than the control group 73.81% (31/42),the difference was statistical significance (P<0.05). The SF-36 scores of the observation group were higher than those of the control group, P<0.05, the difference was statistical significance. Conclusion High quality nursing intervention may effectively alleviate depression, anxiety and other negative emotions, improve lung function, satisfaction and quality of life.

目的 对比分析二氧化锆全瓷冠与钴铬合金烤瓷冠修复牙体牙列缺损的临床疗效。方法 选择2008年3月以来广东工业大学医院口腔科和江西省萍乡市安源区现代口腔门诊部牙体牙列缺损全冠修复患者150例364颗,随机分为2组,实验组采用二氧化锆全瓷冠75例185颗,对照组采用钴铬合金烤瓷冠75例179颗,修复后随访2年对比观察,结果采用χ²检验分析。结果 两组在修复体完整性、固位、边缘密合度、牙敏感症状、继发龋、邻面接触点、过敏反应方面差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05);但在牙龈状况、龈缘着色、颜色匹配方面差异有统计学意义(P＜0.01)。结论 二氧化锆全瓷冠修复体美学效果和生物相容性优于钴铬合金烤瓷冠。

Objective To compare and analyze the clinical effects of restoring tooth dentition defect by using zirconium dioxide full porcelain crowns and cobalt chromium alloy porcelain crowns. Methods 150 patients with 364 teeth suffering from tooth dentition defect in hospital of guangdong university of technology and modern stomatology clinic in pingxiang since March of 2008 are chosen and randomly divided into two groups. 75 patients with 185 teeth in the experimental group are restored with zirconium dioxide full porcelain crowns and 75 patients with 179 teeth in the control group are restored with cobalt chromium alloy porcelain crowns, which was followed up with 2-year observation. Results There is no statistical significance between the two groups in terms of repair integrity, retention, edge adaptation, tooth sensitivity symptoms, secondary caries, contact points, and allergic reaction(P＞0.05). But statistical significance exists in gingival status, gingival coloration, and color matching(P＜0.01). Conclusion Zirconium dioxide full porcelain crowns are superior to cobalt chromium alloy porcelain crowns in aesthetic effect and biocompatibility.