目的 研究注水法内镜下冷圈套器切除术在5~10 mm 无蒂型大肠息肉中的临床疗效。方法 纳入120例阳春市中医院收治的5~10 mm 无蒂型大肠息肉患者,合计246枚息肉,根据结肠息肉切除方式不同分为内镜下注水法冷圈套器切除术（UCSP）与传统内镜下冷圈套器切除术（CCSP）两组,每组分别纳入60例患者。比较两组息肉部位、息肉大小、术后病理诊断、完整息肉切除率、术后病理深度、息肉回收率、手术时间、术中瞬时性出血率、迟发性穿孔率、迟发性出血率以及手术时间、Boston及视觉模拟评分法（VAS）评分。结果 两组息肉部位、息肉大小、术后病理诊断、完整息肉切除率、息肉回收率、术中瞬时性出血率、迟发性穿孔率、迟发性出血率以及Boston评分比较差异均无统计学意义（P>0.05）;UCSP组术后病理深度[（8.80.5）mm]大于CCSP组[（5.90.4）mm]（P<0.01）,CCSP 组手术时间[（21.32.4）min],较UCSP组[（25.71.1）min]缩短（P<0.01）,VAS评分UCSP组[（2.60.7）分]优于CCSP组[（2.90.3）分]（P<0.001）。结论 UCSP能有效、安全5~10 mm无蒂型大肠息肉,术后深度的病理组织学评估获得更高的肌层黏膜切除深度,虽然UCSP手术时间较长,但术后腹痛发生率较低。

Objective To study the clinical efficacy of endoscopic cold snare resection using water injection method in 5-10 mm pedunculated colorectal polyps. Methods A total of 120 patients with 5-10 mm sessile colorectal polyps admitted to Yangchun Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital were selected as the research subjects．A total of 246 polyps were enrolled,and the patients were divided into two groups based on the different methods of endoscopic resection：underwater cold snare polypectomy（UCSP）and conventional cold snare polypectomy（CCSP）,with 60 patients enrolled in each group．Compare the location,size,postoperative pathological diagnosis,complete polypectomy rate,postoperative pathological depth,polyp recovery rate,surgical time,instantaneous intraoperative bleeding rate,delayed perforation rate,delayed bleeding rate,surgical time,Boston and VAS scores between two groups. Results Two groups of polyp locations,polyp size,postoperative pathological diagnosis,complete polyp resection rate,polyp recovery rate,the instantaneous intraoperative bleeding rate,delayed perforation rate,delayed bleeding rate,and Boston score,all of above were not significant different（P>0.05）;the postoperative pathological depth in the UCSP group[（8.8±0.5）mm] was significantly greater than that in the CCSP group[（5.9±0.4）mm]（P<0.01）,and the surgical time in the CCSP group[（21.3±2.4）min] was shorter than that in the UCSP group[（25.7±1.1）min]（P<0.01）． The VAS score in the UCSP group（2.6±0.7）was significantly better than that in the CCSP group（2.9±0.3）（P<0.001）. Conclusions The underwater cold snare polypectomy can achieve good therapeutic results in patients with 5-10 mm sessile colorectal polyps．Further pathological evaluation of postoperative can obtain deeper of myomucosal resection．Although the UCSP group has a longer surgical time,the incidence of postoperative abdominal pain is lower．

目的 探讨食管胃静脉曲张精准断流术与改良“三明治”法治疗食管胃静脉曲张的临床疗效。方法 选取共50例食管胃底静脉曲张患者,按随机数字法分为精准治疗组和对照组,精准治疗组(n=25)行内镜下食管胃静脉曲张精准断流术,对照组(n=25)接受改良“三明治”法内镜治疗。分析对比两组的止血成功率、再出血率、治疗显效率、并发症发生率、聚桂醇和组织胶用量、治疗时间及住院天数等指标。结果 治疗后随访3个月,术后3天内止血率两组均为100％。再出血率精准治疗组为4%,对照组为32%,差异有统计学意义(P=0.010)。静脉曲张治疗显效率精准治疗组为84%,对照组出血率为52%,差异有统计学意义(P=0.015)。并发症发生率在两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。聚桂醇和组织胶平均用量在两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。精准治疗组平均治疗时间为(32.60±6.44)min,对照组为(40.60±7.26)min,差异有统计学意义(P<0.0001);精准治疗组平均住院天数为(8.12±1.24)d,对照组为(9.12±1.39)d,差异有统计学意义(P=0.010)。结论 内镜下精准断流术治疗食管胃静脉曲张再出血率低、效果好、安全性高。

Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of endoscopic selective varices devascularization and the modified Sandwich method on the treatment of esophagogastric varices. Methods 50 patients with esophagogastric varices were divided into therapy (endoscopic selective varices devascularization)group (n=25) and control group (n=25) by random number table method. The therapy group (n=25) received the treatment of endoscopic selective varices devascularization. The control group (n=25) was treated with modified Sandwich method injection. The success rate of hemostasis, rate of recurrent bleeding, rate of varices disappearance, complication rate, dosage of lauromacrogol and tissue adhesive, time of therapy and hospitalization days were compared and analyzed between the two groups. Results During the 3-month followup, the success rates of hemostasis were 100% in both groups 3 days after the treatments. The rates of recurrent bleeding in therapy group and control group were 4% and 32% respectively, with statistically significant difference (P=0.010). The rates of varices disappearance in therapy group and control group were 84%and 52% respectively, the difference (P=0.015) was statistically significant. There was no statistically significant difference in complication rates between the two groups(P>0.05). There was also no statistically significant difference in the average dosage of lauromacrogol and tissue adhesive between the two groups(P>0.05). The average time of therapy in therapy group and control group were(32.60±6.44)minutes and(40.60±7.26)minutes respectively, with statistically significant difference between the two groups(P=0.000). The average hospitalization days in therapy group and control group were(8.12±1.24)days and(9.12±1.39)days respectively, which is statistically significant difference between the two groups(P=0.010). Conclusion Endoscopic selective varices devascularization has the obvious advantage of a significant efficacy, low recurrence rate and high safety.