目的 探讨靶向治疗前晚期非小细胞肺癌（NSCLC）患者血清肿瘤特异性生长因子（TSGF）、乳酸脱氢酶（LDH）、同型半胱氨酸（Hcy）水平与靶向治疗无效的相关性，并分析其对靶向治疗无效的预测价值。方法 选取2023年1月～2025年1月于本院就诊的晚期NSCLC患者108例作为研究组，另选取同期健康志愿者108例作为对照组。比较两组血清TSGF、LDH、Hcy水平。研究组予以靶向治疗（治疗3个疗程），依据靶向治疗无效将其分为无效亚组36例、有效亚组72例，比较其血清TSGF、LDH、Hcy水平。分析血清TSGF、LDH、Hcy与靶向治疗无效的相关性，并分析其对靶向治疗无效的预测价值。结果 研究组血清TSGF、LDH、Hcy水平高于对照组（P＜0.05）；无效亚组血清TSGF、LDH、Hcy水平高于有效亚组（P＜0.05）；校正吸烟史、分化程度、TNM分期后，治疗1个疗程后血清TSGF、LDH、Hcy水平仍与靶向治疗无效独立相关（P＜0.05）；靶向治疗前血清TSGF、LDH、Hcy水平预测靶向治疗无效的AUC值明显大于各指标单独预测（P＜0.05）。结论 晚期NSCLC患者血清TSGF、LDH、Hcy水平升高与靶向治疗无效独立相关，检测其水平对靶向治疗无效具有一定预测价值，且联合预测的效能更高，可指导临床制定及调整诊治方案。

目的 探讨表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸酶抑制剂（EGFR-TKIs）一线治疗耐药后,二线化学治疗（化疗）联合程序性死亡蛋白1及其配体（PD-1/L1）免疫检查点抑制剂方案对晚期非小细胞肺癌（NSCLC）的疗效。方法 选取2018年 6月—2022年10月期间就诊于南通大学附属肿瘤医院院的80例有完整临床资料、应用EGFR-TKIs耐药后晚期NSCLC患者进行回顾性分析,依照不同治疗方式将患者分为观察组与对照组,均为40例。对照组一线EGFR-TKIs治疗耐药后进行二线化疗,观察组一线EGFR-TKIs治疗耐药后进行二线化疗联合PD-1/L1免疫检查点抑制剂治疗。对比两组临床疗效及无进展生存期（PFS）,化疗前后血清中人细胞角蛋白21-1片段（Cyfra21-1）、糖类抗原125（CA125）、碱性成纤维细胞生长因子（bFGF）、血管内皮生长因子（VEGF）水平变化,不良反应发生率及生存质量。结果 观察组客观缓解率与疾病控制率高于对照组（P<0.05）,对照组PFS为10（2.38,24.13）个月,观察组PFS为14（5.27~,5.27）个月,观察组高于对照组（χ²=4.536,P=0.041）;化疗后两组bFGF、VEGF,CA125、Cyfra21-1肿瘤标志物水平均比化疗前降低,且观察组[（17.85±3.32）ng/L、（310.51±88.37）ng/L、（51.62±13.66）U/mL、（10.26±3.37）ng/mL]低于对照组[（19.62±3.24）ng/L、（366.26±49.42）ng/L、（59.26±9.35）U/mL、（12.62±2.73）ng/mL],对比差异有统计学意义（t₁=2.413,P₁=0.018;t₂=3.482,P₂<0.001;t₃=2.919,P₃=0.005;t₄=3.442,P₄<0.001）;两组不良反应发生率对比差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）;化疗后两组世界卫生组织生存质量量表简表评分均升高,观察组[（98.62±8.24）、（101.53±12.62）、（95.28±11.15）、（97.79±10.47）分]高于对照组[（84.25±7.32）、（93.58±15.75）、（82.24±9.34）、（83.47±8.38）]分,对比差异有统计学意义（t₁=8.246,P₁<0.001;t₂=2.491,P₂=0.015;t₃=5.670,P₃<0.001;t₄=6.753,P₄<0.001）。结论 对EGFR-TKIs耐药后晚期非小细胞肺癌患者采取二线化疗联合PD-1/L1免疫检查点抑制剂可提升其临床疗效及生存期,改善血清相关肿瘤标志物表达水平,提升患者生存质量。

Objective To explore the therapeutic effect of second-line chemotherapy combined with PD-1/L1 immune checkpoint inhibitor regimen on advanced non-small cell lung cancer（NSCLC） after epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors（EGFR-TKIs）resistance in first-line chemotherapy．Methods Retrospectively selected 80 patients with advanced NSCLC EGFR TKIs resistance,who were admitted to the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nantong University from June 2018 to October 2022．Patients were divided into an observation group and a control group according to different treatment methods,with 40 cases in each group．The control group received second-line chemotherapy after first-line EGFR-TKIs therapy resistance,while the observation group received second-line chemotherapy and PD-1/L1 inhibitor after first-line EGFR-TKIs therapy reactions and quality of live．Clinical efficacy and PFS,changes in serum levels of human Cyfra21-1,CA125,bFGF,VEGF,incidence of adverse chemotherapy of two groups were compared．Results The ORR and DCR of the observation group were significantly higher than those of the control group（P<0.05）．The mean PFS of the control group was 10（2.38-24.13）months,while the mean PFS of the observation group was 14（5.27-35.27）months．The observation group was higher than the control group（χ²=4.536,P=0.041）．After chemotherapy,levels of bFGF,VEGF,CA125 and Cyfra21-1 tumor markers decreased in both groups,and the observation group [（17.85±3.32）ng/L,（310.51±88.37）ng/L,（51.62±13.66）U/mL,（10.26±3.37）ng/mL] was lower than the control group [（19.62±3.24）ng/L,（366.26±49.42）ng/L,（59.26±9.35）U/mL,（12.62±2.73）ng/mL],which showed statistically significant difference in the comparison（t₁=2.413,P₁=0.018;t₂=3.482,P₂<0.001;t₃=2.919,P₃=0.005;t₄=3.442,P₄<0.001）．There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups（P>0.05）．After treatment,the WHO QOL-BREF scores increased in both patient groups and the observation group scores[（98.62±8.24）,（101.53±12.62）,（95.28±11.15）,（97.79±10.47）] were higher than the control group scores[（84.25±7.32）,（93.58±15.75）,（82.24±9.34）,（83.47±8.38）],which showed statistically significant difference．（t₁=8.246,P₁<0.001;t₂=2.491,P₂=0.015;t₃=5.670,P₃<0.001;t₄=6.753,P₄<0.001）．Conclusions The combination of second-line chemotherapy with PD-1/L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors can improve the clinical efficacy and survival of advanced NSCLC patients who are resistant to EGFR-TKIs,improve the expression levels of serum related tumor markers,and enhance the quality of life of patients．

目的 观察重组人血管内皮抑素注射液（恩度） 联合化疗治非小细胞肺癌（NSCLC）的近期疗效和安全性。方法 对2015年3月—2017年10月经病理组织学或细胞学检查确诊的Ⅲ-Ⅳ期NSCLC74例患者,采用随机数字法把受试者随机分为联合治疗组（n=35）和对照组（n=39）,联合治疗组接受恩度联合化疗的方案治疗;对照组单纯行常规化疗治疗。近期疗效评价采用RECIST标准,生活质量（QOL）采用Karnofsky评分（KPS）,抗癌药物急性与亚急性毒性反应分度标准分0~Ⅳ度。比较两组患者的近期疗效指标（疾病完全缓解（CR）、疾病稳定（ SD）、疾病进展（ PD）、客观有效率（RR）、疾病控制率（DCR ）;QOL评分及毒副反应情况。结果 联合治疗组近期疗效指标RR及DCR高于对照组（P < 0.05）;联合治疗组KPS评分高于对照组（P < 0.05）;两组间的毒副作用包括恶心/呕吐、腹泻、疲乏、脱发、血小板下降及白细胞下降等,两组间毒副反应出现数量比较,差异无统计学意义（P > 0.05）。结论 恩度与化疗药物联合使用可以提高NSCLC疗效和改善患者生活质量,未增加患者不良反应发生率。

Objective To observe the curative effect and the side effects of recombinant human vascular endostatin （Endostar） combined with the chemotherapy on nonsmall cell lung cancer（NSCLC）. Methods Seventy-four NSCLC patients confirmed by histopathology or cytopathology were randomly distributed to combined therapy group （n=35, with Endostar combined with chemotherapy） and control group （n=39, with conventional chemotherapy）. The recent efficacy of drug was evaluated according to the RECIST criteria. The quality of life （QOL） was assessed by usingto the Karnofsky scores, and the safety of drug was evaluated according to WHO side effects criteria. Results The therapeutic effectiveness was better in the combined therapy group than that in the control group（P<0.01）. The KPS was better in co-therapy group than that in the control group（P<0.05）. The common adverse reactions in both groups included neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea/vomiting, diarrhea, lassitude, alopecia, thrombocytopenia and leukocytopenia. However, the incidence rates of adverse reactions between the two group was not significant （P>0.05）. Conclusion Endostar combined with the related chemotherapy may improve the curative effect and QOL of NSCLC.

目的 探讨ERCC1、RRM1、TS蛋白表达对晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)个体化治疗的指导意义。方法 收集经病理确诊的晚期NSCLC患者87例,其中67例愿意接受药敏免疫组化检测的患者作为研究组,采用SP法检测肿瘤组织ERCC1、RRM1、TS蛋白表达,并根据蛋白表达情况选择化疗方案;另外20例患者不进行药敏免疫组化检测,以常规吉西他滨联合顺铂方案化疗,以此作为对照组。比较两组患者化疗的有效率,疾病控制率(DCR),并以无进展生存期(PFS)为指标比较患者预后。结果 研究组67例患者中,PR 33例(49.25%),SD 13例(19.4%),PD 21例(31.35%);对照组20例患者中,PR 4例(20%),SD 4例(20%),PD 12例(60%),两组疗效之间有差异( χ²=6.437,P=0.04),研究组DCR为68.6%,高于对照组DCR 40%,差异有统计学意义(χ²=5.372,P=0.034)。研究组患者的中位PFS高于对照组,研究组的PFS为5月,对照组为3月,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。结论 对晚期NSCLC患者进行ERCC1、RRM1、TS药敏蛋白免疫组化检测,指导个体化治疗方案,能提高患者化疗的疾病控制率及延长患者的疾病进展时间。

目的 对比紫杉醇脂质体(LEP)与紫杉醇(PTX)联合顺铂(DDP)治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的临床疗效及安全性。方法 晚期NSCLC患者48例,随机分为对照组和试验组,对照组采用紫杉醇175 mg/m²,试验组采用紫杉醇脂质体175 mg/m²,均联合顺铂75 mg/m²化疗,21天为1个周期,治疗2个周期后评价疗效,记录近期疗效与治疗期间不良反应。结果 近期疗效:对照组有效率37.50%,疾病控制率为79.17%,试验组有效率为41.67%,疾病控制率为83.33%,两组差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。不良反应:白细胞减少、贫血及血小板减少的发生率两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),脱发和恶心、呕吐的发生率两组差异亦无统计学意义(P>0.05),但试验组皮疹、呼吸困难、肌肉痛及周围神经炎的发生率明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 紫杉醇脂质体治疗晚期NSCLC与紫杉醇疗效相当,但周围神经炎及过敏反应较紫杉醇为轻。

Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel liposome combined with cisplatin and paclitaxel combined with cisplatin in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods 48 patients with advanced NSCLC were randomized into two groups, experimental group were given paclitaxel liposome at 175 mg/m²,and control group were given paclitaxel at 175 mg/m². Both groups combined with DDP at 75 mg/m² per cycle every 21 days.The efficacy and safety were evaluated after two cycles. Results The overall response rate was 37.50% in experimental group and 41.67% in control group, and the disease control rate was 79.17% in experimental group and 83.33% in control group. There was no significant difference between two groups(P>0.05). Though there was no significant difference in incidence of neutropenia,anemia, thrombocytopenia and alopecia, nausea and vomiting, but the occurred rates of rash、muscle pain and peripheral neuritis were significantly lower in experimental group than those in control group. Conclusion In the treatment of advanced NSCLC, both paclitaxel liposome combined with cisplatin and paclitaxel combined with cisplatin have similar efficacy, but paclitaxel liposome can significantly reduce the incidence of peripheral neuritis and serious hypersensitive reactions.

目的 探讨同步放化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的临床疗效。方法 选取我院2014年收治的晚期NSCLC患者102例,随机分为观察组和对照组,对照组以紫杉醇联合顺铂化疗方案(TP)化疗治疗,观察组加用三维适形放疗同步放化疗治疗,观察两组的临床疗效和不良反应。结果 观察组和对照组患者的总有效率分别为43.14%和21.57% (P<0.05),两组患者的总控制率分别为84.31%和66.67% (P<0.05)。两组患者Ⅲ～Ⅳ级胃肠道反应、白细胞减少、骨髓抑制的发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),观察组比对照组增加了放射性肺炎和放射性食管炎的发生 (P<0.05)。两组患者生活质量比较,差异具有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。结论 同步放化疗治疗晚期NSCLC可以显著提高治疗的总有效率、肿瘤的控制率及生活质量,但也使不良反应增加,选择治疗方案时应根据个体情况综合考虑。

Objective To study the clinical efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of advanced non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods 102 cases of advanced NSCLC treated in our hospital in 2014 were selected and randomly divided into the observation group and the control group. Patients in control group were treated by chemotherapy with Paclitaxel combined Cisplatin (TP), while those in observation group were treated by concurrent chemoradiotherapy with three- dimensional conformal radiotherapy and TP. The clinical efficacy and adverse reactions of the two groups were observed. Results The total effective rate of the observation group and the control group were 43.14% and 21.57% (P<0.05), respectively. The total control rate of the two groups were 84.31% and 66.67%(P<0.05). In two groups III ~ IV gastrointestinal tract reaction, leukopenia, bone marrow suppression occurrence had no statistical significance(P>0.05). Incidence of radiation pneumonitis and radiation esophagitis increased in observation group(P<0.05). The difference of quality of life between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion Concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy in the treatment ofadvanced non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC)can not only significantly improve the treatment, tumor control rate and quality of life, but also make adverse reaction increased. Treatment options should be chosen based on individual circumstances into account