目的 探讨80例局部宫颈癌根治性同步放化疗的临床疗效及预后影响因素。方法 选取鹤壁市妇幼保健院2018年1月—2021年1月收治的80例宫颈癌患者进行回顾性分析,患者依照其病变程度均采取积极的手术与同步放化疗,其中40例患者采取单纯化疗,将其分为化疗组,40例患者采取同步放化疗,将其分为同步放化疗组,分析其近远期临床疗效与不良反应发生率。对所有患者进行3年随访,将患者分为两个亚组,即预后不良组（n=20）和预后良好组（n=60）,对比两组患者一般临床特征,应用Logistic回归模型分析局部宫颈癌根治性同步放化疗的预后影响因素。结果 同步放化疗组ORR、DCR高与化疗组（P<0.05）,对照组中位无进展生存期为5.4（2.38~14.52）个月。观察组中位无进展生存期为6.66（2~20.1）个月,观察组高于对照组（χ²=4.536,P=0.041）;同步放化疗组盆腔积液、阴道炎症、泌尿生殖道反应、直肠反应、骨髓抑制、胃肠道反应发生率略高于化疗组,但两组对比差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）;预后良好组与预后不良组患者年龄、是否绝经、病理类型、肿瘤大小对比差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）,预后良好组与预后不良组患者临床分期、组织分化程度、淋巴结转移、是否同步放化疗、治疗前血红蛋白水平对比差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）;组织分化程度低、未同步放化疗、治疗前血红蛋白水平低为局部宫颈癌的预后不良影响因素（P<0.05）。结论 对局部宫颈癌患者采取根治性同步放化疗与单一化疗相比可提升其临床疗效与远期生存率,同时安全性较高。组织分化程度低、未同步放化疗、治疗前血红蛋白水平低为宫颈癌预后不良影响因素。

Objective To explore the clinical efficacy and prognostic factors of 80 cases of local cervical cancer treated with radical synchronous radiotherapy and chemotherapy．Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 80 cervical cancer patients admitted to Hebi Maternal and Child Health Hospital from January 2018 to January 2021．Patients underwent surgery and synchronous radiotherapy and chemotherapy according to their degree of lesion．Among them,40 patients received simple chemotherapy and were divided into a chemotherapy group,while 40 patients received synchronous radiotherapy and chemotherapy and were divided into a synchronous radiotherapy and chemotherapy group．The short-term and long-term clinical efficacy and incidence of adverse reactions were analyzed．A 3-year follow-up was conducted on all patients,and patients were divided into two subgroups,namely the poor prognosis group（n=20）and the good prognosis group（n=60）．The general clinical characteristics of the two groups of patients were compared,and a Logistic regression model was used to analyze the prognostic factors of local cervical cancer radical synchronous radiotherapy and chemotherapy．Results The objective relief rate and disease control rate of the synchronous radiotherapy and chemotherapy group were significantly higher than those of the chemotherapy group（P<0.05）,and the median progression free survival of the control group was 5.4（2.38-14.52）months．The median progression free survival of the observation group was 6.66（2-20.1）months,which was higher than that of the control group（χ²=4.536,P=0.041）．The incidence of pelvic fluid accumulation,vaginitis,urogenital reactions,rectal reactions,bone marrow suppression,and gastrointestinal reactions in the synchronous radiotherapy and chemotherapy group was slightly higher than that in the chemotherapy group,but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups（P>0.05）．There was no statistically significant difference in age,menopause,pathological type,and tumor size between the patients with good prognosis and those with poor prognosis（P>0.05）．However,there was a statistically significant difference in clinical stage,tissue differentiation,lymph node metastasis,synchronous radiotherapy and chemotherapy,and pre-treatment hemoglobin levels between the patients with good prognosis and those with poor prognosis（P<0.05）．Low degree of tissue differentiation,lack of synchronous radiotherapy and chemotherapy,and low hemoglobin levels before treatment were adverse prognostic factors for local cervical cancer（P<0.05）．Conclusion sCompared with single radiotherapy,radical synchronous radiotherapy and chemotherapy can improve the clinical efficacy and long-term survival rate of patients with local cervical cancer,with higher safety．The severe tissue differentiation,unsynchronized chemoradiotherapy and hemoglobin before treatment were the adverse prognostic factors of cervical cancer．

目的 评估基于NRS2002系统的多学科营养支持对直肠癌放化疗患者的作用。方法 选取2017年2月—2020年2月我院收治的96例直肠癌放化疗患者作为研究对象,根据入院建档顺序不同分2组,每组48例,对照组接受常规护理,观察组接受基于NRS2002系统的多学科营养支持。比较2组干预前后主观全面评定法(PG-SGA)评分、营养指标[前白蛋白(prealbumin, PA)、血清白蛋白(serum albumin, SA)、转铁蛋白(transferrin, TF)]、癌因性疲乏、生存质量(FLIC评分)。结果 干预后观察组营养状况优于对照组(P＜0.05);干预后观察组SA、PA、TF高于对照组(P＜0.05);干预后观察组癌因性疲乏低于对照组(P＜0.05);干预后观察组生存质量FLIC各维度评分高于对照组(P＜0.05)。结论 基于NRS2002系统的多学科营养支持有助于改善直肠癌放化疗患者营养状态,减轻癌因性疲乏,提升生存质量水平。

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of multidisciplinary nutritional support through NRS2002 system on patients undergoing radiotherapy and chemotherapy with rectal cancer. Methods From February 2017 to February 2020, 96 cases of rectal cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy and chemotherapy in our hospital were selected as the research objects, which were divided into two groups according to the order of filing, 48 cases in each group. The control group received routine nursing, and the observation group received multidisciplinary nutritional support through NRS2002 system. The PG-SGA score, nutritional indexes [prealbumin (PA), serum albumin (SA), transferrin (TF)], cancer-related fatigue and quality of life (FLIC score) were compared between two groups before and after intervention. Results After the intervention, the nutritional status of the observation group was better than that of the control group (P<0.05). The SA, PA, TF of the observation group were higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). The cancer-related fatigue of the observation group was lower than that of the control group (P<0.05), and the FLIC score of the observation group was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Multidisciplinary nutritional support through NRS2002 system was helpful to improve nutritional status of patients, reduce cancer-related fatigue and improve quality of life of patients with rectal cancer undergoing radiotherapy and chemotherapy.

目的 探究老年食管鳞癌患者单纯放疗、同步放化疗临床治疗效果。方法 选我院2018年1月—2020年12月期间90例老年食管鳞癌患者为研究对象,依据不同治疗方式将其分为对照组、观察组,各45例,分别接受单纯放疗、同步放化疗治疗,比较2组治疗效果及治疗安全性。结果 观察组治疗总有效率为75.56%,与对照组60.00%相近(P＞0.05);观察组疾病控制率为97.78%,较对照组84.44%高(P＜0.05);观察组放射性肺炎、骨髓抑制发生率为24.44%、77.78%,较对照组6.67%、48.89%高;且观察组放射性肺炎、骨髓抑制、放射性食管炎2级占比分别为17.78%、35.56%、57.78%,均较对照组2.22%、8.89%、24.44%高(P＜0.05)。结论 在老年食管鳞癌患者治疗中,与单纯放疗相比,同步放化疗可提升疾病控制能力,但会增加治疗不良反应,增加不良反应严重程度,因此在临床治疗中,需慎重选择。

Objective To explore the clinical effect of radiotherapy only and concurrent chemoradiotherapy in elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Methods Ninety cases of elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in our hospital from January 2018 to December 2020 were selected as research objects.According to different treatment methods, they were divided into control group and observation group, 45 cases in each group.They were treated with radiotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy respectively.The treatment effect and safety of the two groups were compared. Results The total effective rate of the observation group was 75.56%, which was close to the control group (60.00%, P>0.05). The disease control rate of the observation group was 97.78%, which was higher than control group (84.44%, P<0.05). The incidence of radiation pneumonia and bone marrow suppression of the observation group were 24.44% and 77.78%, which were higher than that of the control group (6.67%, 48.89%). The proportion of radiation pneumonia, bone marrow suppression, radiation esophagitis grade 2 of the observation group were 17.78%, 35.78% and 57.78% respectively, higher than that of the control group (2.22%, 8.89%, 24.44% respectively, P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with radiotherapy only, concurrent chemoradiotherapy improved the ability of disease control in elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, but it increased the adverse reactions and aggravated the severity of adverse reactions.Therefore, it is necessary to make a careful choice in clinical treatment.

目的 探讨同步放化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的临床疗效。方法 选取我院2014年收治的晚期NSCLC患者102例,随机分为观察组和对照组,对照组以紫杉醇联合顺铂化疗方案(TP)化疗治疗,观察组加用三维适形放疗同步放化疗治疗,观察两组的临床疗效和不良反应。结果 观察组和对照组患者的总有效率分别为43.14%和21.57% (P<0.05),两组患者的总控制率分别为84.31%和66.67% (P<0.05)。两组患者Ⅲ～Ⅳ级胃肠道反应、白细胞减少、骨髓抑制的发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),观察组比对照组增加了放射性肺炎和放射性食管炎的发生 (P<0.05)。两组患者生活质量比较,差异具有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。结论 同步放化疗治疗晚期NSCLC可以显著提高治疗的总有效率、肿瘤的控制率及生活质量,但也使不良反应增加,选择治疗方案时应根据个体情况综合考虑。

Objective To study the clinical efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of advanced non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods 102 cases of advanced NSCLC treated in our hospital in 2014 were selected and randomly divided into the observation group and the control group. Patients in control group were treated by chemotherapy with Paclitaxel combined Cisplatin (TP), while those in observation group were treated by concurrent chemoradiotherapy with three- dimensional conformal radiotherapy and TP. The clinical efficacy and adverse reactions of the two groups were observed. Results The total effective rate of the observation group and the control group were 43.14% and 21.57% (P<0.05), respectively. The total control rate of the two groups were 84.31% and 66.67%(P<0.05). In two groups III ~ IV gastrointestinal tract reaction, leukopenia, bone marrow suppression occurrence had no statistical significance(P>0.05). Incidence of radiation pneumonitis and radiation esophagitis increased in observation group(P<0.05). The difference of quality of life between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion Concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy in the treatment ofadvanced non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC)can not only significantly improve the treatment, tumor control rate and quality of life, but also make adverse reaction increased. Treatment options should be chosen based on individual circumstances into account