目的 探讨头位分娩评分法在孕妇分娩过程中的应用价值。方法 选取2020年1月—2022年12月于郑州市妇幼保健院进行建档住院的4 000例待产分娩孕妇作为研究对象,所有孕妇在宫口已开时都给予头位分娩评分,观察与记录所有孕妇的分娩方式与头位分娩评分法状况,记录新生儿出生1 min与出生5 min的Apgar评分,记录所有孕妇的产后并发症发生情况。结果 在4 000例孕妇中,Apgar评分≤8分者156例、9~10分者894例、≥11分者2 950例。不同头位分娩评分法孕妇的年龄、孕周、孕次、产次对比差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。≤8分者的剖宫产率为100.0%,9~10分者、≥11分者分别为35.3%、5.7%,对比差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。≤8分者、9~10分者、≥11分者的新生儿出生1 min与出生5 min的Apgar评分对比差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。≤8分者、9~10分者、≥11分者的产后发热、产后出血、产后血肿、产后尿潴留等并发症发生率为分别为13.5%、2.0%、0.2%,对比差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论 头位分娩评分法在产科中处理头位分娩时具有指导价值,值得推广应用。

Objective To explore and analyze the application values of the head position delivery scoring method in the delivery process of 4 000 pregnant women．Methods Selected 4 000 cases of pregnant women as the study object,all pregnant women gave head delivery score,observed and recorded the delivery mode and head delivery scoring method,recorded the Apgar score of 1 min and 5 min,and recorded the occurrence of postpartum complications of all pregnant women．Results Among the 4 000 pregnant women,156 scored ≤8,894 scored 9-10,and 2 950 scored ≥11．There was no significant difference in the age,gestational age,pregnancy time and delivery status of pregnant women in different head delivery scoring methods（P>0.05）．The cesarean section of patients with ≤8 score was 100.0%,those with 9-10 score and those with ≥11 score were 35.3% and 5.7%,respectively,and there were significant differences（P<0.05）．There was no significant difference in Apgar score between newborns with ≤8 scores,9-10 scores and ≥11 scores at 1 min and 5 min after birth（P>0.05）．The incidence rates of puerperal fever,postpartum hemorrhage,postpartum hematoma and postpartum urinary retention were 13.5%,2.0% and 0.2% in patients with ≤8 score,9~10 score and ≥11 score,respectively,and there were significant differences（P<0.05）．Conclusions The head delivery scoring method has guiding value in handling head delivery in obstetrics and is worth promoting and applying．

目的 探讨延续性健康指导联合预见性干预对慢性脑卒中患者脑功能影响。方法 选取2019年6月—2020年6月我院收治的慢性脑卒中患者118例,使用随机数字表法将其分为两组,对照组进行预见性干预,研究组进行延续性健康指导联合预见性干预。比较两组效果、神经运动功能、不良反应。结果 研究组效果大于对照组(P＜0.05);研究组神经运动功能大于对照组(P＜0.05);研究组不良反应少于对照组(P＜0.05)。结论 慢性脑卒中护理中,延续性健康指导联合预见性干预效果较好,值得应用。

Objective To investigate the effects of continuous health guidance and combined predictive intervention on cerebral function in patients with chronic stroke. Methods A total of 118 patients with chronic stroke admitted to our hospital from June 2019 to June 2020 were selected and divided into two groups using the random number table method. The control group received predictive intervention, and the study group received continuous health guidance combined predictive intervention. The effects, neuromotor functions and adverse reactions of the two groups were compared. Results The effect of the study group was greater than that of the control group (P<0.05). The neuromotor function of the study group was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). The adverse reactions in the study group were less than those in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion In the nursing of chronic stroke, the effect of continuous health guidance combined with predictive intervention is good, and it is worth applying.