目的 探讨SNCG蛋白在卵巢癌组织中的表达情况及临床意义,明确SNCG在人卵巢癌中的表达情况及其恶性程度的关系,为临床卵巢癌的诊断、治疗及预后提供理论依据。方法 收集2010年1月—2015年1月石河子大学医学院第一附属医院收治的具有完整临床病理资料和石蜡切片的119例卵巢癌以及50例正常卵巢患者,用免疫组化方法检测组织中SNCG的表达情况,并分析SNCG的表达与卵巢癌患者临床病理特征及预后的关系。结果 SNCG在卵巢癌组织中的表达高于正常卵巢组织(χ²=73.575,P＜0.001);SNCG的表达与卵巢癌患者的肿瘤分期、分化程度、淋巴结转移、达到满意减瘤术、CA125以及HE4水平相关,差异均有统计学意义(P＜0.05);与卵巢癌肿瘤的原发部位、腹水、复发及化疗耐药无关,差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05);SNCG的过表达与HGSOC患者的PFS、OS相关,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);多变量Cox比例风险模型分析显示SNCG是HGSOC患者的独立预后因素,与PFS(HR=2.107,95%CI:1.014～3.795,P=0.034)、OS(HR=1.238,95%CI:0.716～1.928,P=0.047)相关。结论 SNCG在卵巢癌中高表达,与患者肿瘤分期、分化程度、淋巴结转移、达到满意减瘤术、CA125以及HE4水平有关,与卵巢癌患者的复发与化疗耐药无关,SNCG蛋白的过表达可作为HGSOC患者的独立预后因素,指导临床诊治。

Objective To detect the expression of SNCG in ovarian cancer tissue and its clinical significance, to clarify the relationship between the expression of SNCG in human ovarian cancer and the degree of malignancy, so as to provide theoretical basis for the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of clinical ovarian cancer. Methods From January 2010 to January 2015 in First Affiliated Hospital of Medical College of Shihezi University,119 patients with ovarian cancer and 50 patients with normal ovarian which had complete clinical data and paraffin section were selected. Immunohistochemical method was used to detect ovarian SNCG expression, and the expression of SNCG relationship with clinical pathological characteristics and prognosis of patients with ovarian cancer was analyzed. Results The expression of SNCG in ovarian cancer tissue was significantly higher than that in normal ovarian tissue (χ²=73.575,P＜0.001). SNCG expression was correlated with tumor stage, degree of differentiation, lymph node metastasis, satisfying tumor reduction, CA125 and HE4 levels in ovarian cancer patients, and the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05). It was not correlated with the tumor primary site, ascites, recurrence of ovarian tumor and chemotherapy resistance, and the differences were not statistically significant (P＞0.05).The overexpression of SNCG was correlated with PFS and OS in HGSOC patients, and the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05). Analysis of multivariate Cox proportional risk model showed that SNCG was an independent prognostic factor in patients with HGSOC, related to PFS (HR=2.107,95%CI: 1.014-3.795,P=0.034) and OS (HR=1.238,95%CI: 0.716-1.928,P=0.047). Conclusion The high expression of SNCG in ovarian cancer is related to tumor stage, degree of differentiation, lymph node metastasis, satisfying tumor reduction, CA125 and HE4 expressions, but it is not related to the recurrence of ovarian cancer or chemotherapy resistance. The overexpression of SNCG protein can be used as an independent prognostic factor in patients with HGSOC for clinical diagnosis and treatment guidance.

目的 评估中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)在晚期结直肠癌(CRC)患者化疗疗效及预后的意义。方法 回顾性收集2016年1月—2019年4月期间接受以奥沙利铂为基础的标准一线化疗的晚期不可切除结直肠癌患者50例临床病历资料,并在2个化疗周期后评估化疗疗效;根据入组患者化疗前血液学数据计算中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR),运用受试者工作特征曲线确定的NLR最佳截断值,将患者分为高NLR(≥3.785) 组和低NLR(＜3.785) 组,比较高、低NLR与临床病理特征、化疗疗效及无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)差异;采用COX回归分析模型分析影响晚期结直肠癌患者PFS、OS的因素。结果 高、低NLR两组肿瘤分化程度(P=0.030)、ECOG评分(P=0.003)、CEA(P=0.011)、CA19-9(P=0.047)比较,差异有统计学意义;高低NLR两组间化疗疗效比较,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.001),高NLR组化疗疗效较差;两组中位PFS分别为3.44个月和12.84个月,差异有统计学意义(χ²=39.730,P＜0.001),两组中位OS分别为7.59个月和22.32个月,差异有统计学意义(χ²=40.505,P＜0.001);Cox回归分析提示NLR高低、CEA水平是PFS、OS的独立预后因素(P＜0.05)。结论 高水平NLR与晚期结直肠癌患者化疗疗效不佳和预后不良相关,可作为其化疗疗效及预后监测的指标。

Objective To evaluate the value of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in the chemotherapy curative effect and prognosis of patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods Retrospective collection of clinical data from 50 patients with advanced unresectable colorectal cancer who received oxaliplatin-based standard first-line chemotherapy between January 2016 and April 2019. Chemotherapy curative effect was evaluated following 2 chemotherapy cycles. Calculation of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) based on pre-chemotherapy hematology data. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the optimal cutoff value of NLR,according to patients who were divided into groups of high NLR(NLR≥3.785)and low NLR(NLR≥3.785).The differences between high and low NLR and clinicopathological features, efficacy of chemotherapy, progression-free survival (PFS), and total survival (OS) were compared. COX regression analysis mode was used to analysis of factors affecting PFS and OS in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Results The differences in tumor differentiation (P=0.030), ECOG score (P=0.003), CEA (P=0.011), CA19-9 (P=0.047) in the high and low NLR groups were statistically significant. The differences in chemotherapy between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.001), and the high NLR group was less effective. The median PFS of the high and low NLR groups were 3.44 months and 12.84 months, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (χ²=39.730, P<0.001). The median OS of the high and low NLR groups was 7.59 months and 22.32 months, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (χ²=40.505, P<0.001). Cox regression analysis suggested that NLR levels and CEA levels were independent prognostic factors for PFS and OS(P＜0.05). Conclusion High-level NLR is associated with poor chemotherapy response and poor prognosis in patients with advanced colorectal cancer, and was used as an indicator of chemotherapy efficacy and prognosis.