【摘要】目的：探讨超声骨刀与高速涡轮手机在颌骨囊肿患者外科手术中的应用效果及安全性。方法：研究选择2024年1月~2025年6月至我院行囊肿刮治术治疗的100例颌骨囊肿患者，通过隐藏信封法将入组患者随机列为常规组、试验组，每组50例。常规组术中应用高速涡轮手机去骨，试验组术中应用超声骨刀去骨，比较两组患者的手术情况，术后疼痛肿胀情况及住院期间并发症发生情况。术毕随访半年，比较两组患者神经损伤情况及骨愈合情况。结果：试验组的术中出血量、术后24h引流量、切骨精度偏差分别为（30.59±5.24）mL、（20.55±5.28）mL、（0.18±0.05）mm，均低于常规组[（40.19±7.33）mL、（30.46±6.45）mL、（0.59±0.12）mm]（t=7.534，8.407，22.301；P＜0.05）；手术耗时与常规组比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。试验组术后24h、48h、72h的视觉模拟疼痛量表（VAS）评分，肿胀评分均低于常规组（t=4.403，3.354，12.986，4.610，2.911，14.888；P＜0.05）。试验组住院期间的并发症发生率4.00%（2/50）低于常规组18.00%（9/50）（x2=5.005；P＜0.05）。试验组随访第1个月、第3个月、第6个月的神经传导速度（NCV）均高于常规组，两点辨别觉（TPD）均低于常规组（t=4.598，5.784，6.322，3.194，3.595，3.501；P＜0.05）。截至随访结束时，试验组的成骨率分别为（75.27±8.14）%高于常规组（68.18±5.27）%]，骨缺损面积、创面愈合时间、骨吸收量分别为（55.29±5.42）%、（3.22±0.47）月、（1.25±0.36）mm，均低于常规组[（62.44±7.51）%、（5.08±1.33）月、（2.49±0.32）mm]（t=5.170，5.459，9.324，18.204；P＜0.05）。结论：与高速涡轮手机相比，超声骨刀可降低颌骨囊肿患者术中出血风险并实现精准去骨，在减轻术后疼痛、肿胀程度同时能一定程度减轻术后神经损伤，对促进患者骨愈合也有积极影响。

[Abstract]Objective:To explore the application effect and safety of ultrasound bone scalpel and high-speed turbine mobile phone in surgical procedures for patients with jaw cysts.Methods:A total of 100 patients with maxillary cysts who underwent curettage surgery in our hospital from January 2024 to June 2025 were selected for the study. The enrolled patients were randomly divided into a control group and an experimental group using the hidden envelope method, with 50 patients in each group. The conventional group used high-speed turbine mobile phones for bone removal during surgery, while the experimental group used ultrasonic bone knives for bone removal during surgery. The surgical conditions, postoperative pain and swelling, and incidence of complications during hospitalization were compared between the two groups of patients. Follow up for six months after surgery to compare the nerve damage and bone healing between the two groups of patients.Results:The intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative 24-hour drainage volume, and bone cutting accuracy deviation of the experimental group were (30.59 ± 5.24) mL, (20.55 ± 5.28) mL, and (0.18 ± 0.05) mm, respectively, all lower than those of the control group [(40.19 ± 7.33) mL, (30.46 ± 6.45) mL, and (0.59 ± 0.12) mm] (t=7.534，8.407，22.301; P<0.05); The surgical time of the experimental group was similar to the control group (P>0.05). The VAS scores and swelling scores of the experimental group at 24, 48, and 72 hours after surgery were lower than the control group (t=4.403，3.354，12.986，4.610，2.911，14.888；; P<0.05). The incidence of complications during hospitalization in the experimental group was 4.00% (2/50) lower than the control group 18.00% (9/50) (x2=5.005; P<0.05).The NCV of the experimental group was higher than the control group at the1,3,6 months of follow-up, and TPD was lower than the control group (t=4.598，5.784，6.322，3.194，3.595，3.501; P<0.05). As of the end of follow-up, the osteogenic rate of the experimental group was (75.27 ± 8.14)% higher than the control group (68.18 ± 5.27)%. The bone defect area, wound healing time, and bone resorption were (55.29 ± 5.42)%, (3.22 ± 0.47) months, and (1.25 ± 0.36) mm, lower than the control group [(62.44 ± 7.51)%, (5.08 ± 1.33) months, and (2.49 ± 0.32) mm] (t=5.170，5.459，9.324，18.204; P<0.05).Conclusion:Compared with high-speed turbo phones, ultrasonic bone scalpel can reduce the risk of intraoperative bleeding in patients with jaw cysts and achieve precise bone removal. It can alleviate postoperative pain and swelling while greatly avoiding postoperative nerve damage, and has a positive impact on promoting bone healing in patients.