目的 了解广州市区全血乳糜血报废的趋势变化和献血人群特征,并分析其背后的原因,为进一步减少全血乳糜血报废提供参考依据。方法 通过广州血液中心信息系统检索,统计2017—2019年期间中心全血乳糜血报废量、报废率等相关数据,并分层统计性别、年龄、献血方式与报废的关系,提出有效减少乳糜血报废的对策。结果 2017—2019年期间广州血液中心共采集制备3 003 998单位血液,因乳糜血原因报废的血液达69 311单位,报废率2.31%,占总报废的44.02%。其中,男性献血者乳糜血报废率显著高于女性献血者,报废血液主要为18～40岁年龄段的无偿献血,约一半报废血来自团体献血者。结论 加大献血知识的宣传,特别是团体献血者;做细献血前征询工作和献血后跟踪随访;关注男性和年轻献血者,进一步减少全血乳糜血报废几率。

Objective To evaluate the trend of scrapped chylemia blood in whole blood collection and the characteristics of blood donors in urban area of Guangzhou, analyze the reasons behind so as to provide reference for further reducing chylemia blood scrapped. Methods Search the whole blood collection and scrapped chylemia blood data from 2017 to 2019 through the information system of Guangzhou Blood Center, stratifiy gender,age,donation way, and look for solutions. Results 3 003 998 U blood component were collected and prepared from 2017 to 2019. Totally 69 311 U chylemia blood were scrapped due to chylemia blood, accounting for 44.02% of the total discarded blood. Scrapped chylemia blood rate were significantly higher among male blood donors than among female donors,and mainly aged from 18-40 donors. About half of the discarded blood came from group donors. Conclusion Greater efforts to publicize especially for group donors,careful consultation before blood donation and follow-up after blood donation should be taken. We should pay close attention to male and young blood donors, so as to further reduce the possibility of scrapped chylemia blood.

目的 探讨影响初次机采血小板献血者再次捐献的相关因素,为制定机采献血者保留策略提供依据。方法 选择2016年1月1日—2016年12月31日在广州血液中心首次成功捐献机采血小板的13 899例献血者为研究对象,分析每个献血者献血时性别、年龄、文化程度、是否发生献血不良反应与下一年度是否再次捐献机采血小板的相关性。结果 男性献血者再次捐献率(10.68%)高于女性献血者再次捐献率(8.94%),差异有统计学意义(P＜0.01);献血者年龄18～25岁组再次捐献率最高为12.86%,46～60岁组再次捐献率最低为6.46%,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.001);献血者文化程度高中或职中组再次捐献率最高为11.23%,本科或以上组再次捐献率最低为8.94%,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.001);未发生不良反应献血者再次捐献率(10.37%)高于发生不良反应献血者再次捐献率(5.56%),差异有统计学意义(P＜0.01)。结论 男性、年龄较小、文化程度较低和未发生献血不良反应的献血者更愿意返回再次捐献机采血小板,对这部分献血者采取针对性保留措施,有利于建立起一支固定捐献机采血小板的献血者队伍。

Objective To explore the related factors affecting the re-donation of the first apheresis platelet donors, and to provide a basis for the retention strategy. Methods A total of 13 899 blood donors who successfully donated apheresis platelets for the first time in Guangzhou Blood Center from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016 were selected as subjects. The correlation among gender, age, education level, adverse reactions of blood donation and whether platelet collection was re-donated in the next year was analyzed. Results Re-donation rate of male blood donors (10.68%) was higher than that of female blood donors (8.94%). The difference was statistically significant (P<0.01). Re-donation rate of blood donors aged 18～25 was the highest 12.86%, and that of 46～60 was the lowest 6.46%. The difference was significant (P<0.001). Re-donation rate of high school or vocational college blood donors was the highest 11.23%. The lowest re-donation rate was 8.94% in the undergraduate group or above, and the difference was statistically significant (P< 0.001). The re-donation rate of donors without adverse reactions (10.37%) was higher than that of donors with adverse reactions (5.56%). The difference was statistically significant (P<0.01). Conclusion Male, younger, less educated and no adverse reactions to blood donation are more willing to return to donate platelet again. Targeting these donors for reserve measure will conducive to the establishment of a fixed platelet donor team.

目的 分析广州市区2014—2016年无偿献血血液报废情况,探讨降低血液报废措施,减少血液报废。方法 收集并统计广州市区2014—2016年血液报废情况,分别统计报废血液比例。结果 2014—2016年报废血液产品共170 576 U,报废率为5.99%;非检验原因报废率(3.11%)高于检验原因报废率(2.88%),检验原因报废率呈逐年下降趋势,其中ALT及HBsAg报废率较高,非检验原因报废率呈逐年上升,其中乳糜血报废率较高。结论 进一步加强献血宣传和征询工作,以及做好团队献血的快速筛查工作,提高工作人员的操作水平,均有利于进一步降低血液报废率。

Objective To analysis blood products and disposal situation in Guangzhou from 2014-2016 to provide measures for reduce the scrap rate. Methods Collecting and statistical analysis of blood products scrap rate from 2014-2016 in Guangzhou respectively. Results A total of 170 576U blood products were scrapped in 2014-2016 and the scrap rate was 5.99%, in which non-detection scrap rate (3.11%) was higher than detection scrap rate (2.88%). Non-detection scrap rate was decreasing these years, among which ALT and HBsAg had a large proportion, while detection scrap rate was increasing, in which chylaemia scrap rate was the most highest. Conclusion We need to strengthen and publicize blood donation, as well as do well rapid screening of team blood donation and improve the operating level of staff.