目的 观察低频电刺激治疗对脑卒中偏瘫疗效,并分析其对患者周围神经电生理学与形态学的影响。方法 选取本院94例脑卒中偏瘫患者,以数字表法随机分为两组,各47例,对照组接受基础康复治疗,实验组予以早期综合康复治疗(于对照组基础上进行低频电刺激治疗),比较两组治疗前后Berg平衡量表(BBS)评分、Fugl-Meyer运动功能(FMA)评分、关节(腕与踝)主动活动范围(AROM)、周围神经电生理学[感觉神经传导速度(SCV)、运动神经传导速度(MCV)、动态肌电图]与形态学[腕横纹正中神经(MN)横截面积(CSA)、宽度(W)以及厚度(T)]。结果 实验组治疗后BBS评分、上肢与下肢FMA评分高于对照组(P＜0.05),腕与踝AROM大于对照组(P＜0.05);实验组治疗后腓总神经与胫神经SCV、MCV高于对照组(P＜0.05),肱二头肌与腓肠肌协同收缩率均低于对照组(P＜0.05);两组治疗前后MN的CSA、T比较无差异(P＞0.05),实验组治疗后MN的W大于对照组(P＜0.05)。结论 低频电刺激联合早期综合康复治疗可有效提高脑卒中偏瘫患者平衡能力、关节活动度及上下肢功能,改善周围神经电生理学与形态学,减轻周围神经损伤。

Objective To observe the curative effect of low frequency electrical stimulation treatment on stroke hemiplegia, and analyze its influences on peripheral nerve electrophysiology and morphology of patients. Methods A total of 94 patients with stroke hemiplegia in the hospital were randomly divided into two groups by number table method, 47 cases in each group. The control group was given basic rehabilitation treatment, while experimental group was given early comprehensive rehabilitation treatment (low frequency electrical stimulation on basis of control group). The scores of Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA), joint (wrist, ankle) active range of motion (AROM), peripheral nerve electrophysiology [sensory conduction velocity (SCV), motor conduction velocity (MCV), dynamic electromyogram (EMG) ] and morphology [cross-sectional area (CSA) of carpal transverse median nerve (MN), width (W), thickness (T)] before and after treatment were compared between the two groups. Results After treatment, scores of BBS, upper and lower limbs FMA in experimental group were higher than those in control group (P<0.05), AROM of wrist and ankle was larger than that in control group (P<0.05). After treatment, SCV and MCV of common peroneal nerve and tibial nerve in experimental group were higher than those in control group (P<0.05), while co-contraction rates of biceps and gastrocnemius muscles were lower than those in control group (P<0.05). Before and after treatment, there were no differences in CSA and T of MN between the two groups (P>0.05). After treatment, W of MN in experimental group was greater than that in control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Low-frequency electrical stimulation combined with early comprehensive rehabilitation therapy may effectively increase the balance ability, joint range of motion and upper and lower limb function of stroke patients with hemiplegia, improve peripheral nerve electrophysiology and morphology, and reduce peripheral nerve injury.

目的 观察镜像视觉反馈和改良强制性运动治疗对脑卒中偏瘫患者上肢功能的影响。方法 前瞻性纳入2013年12月—2016年10月在我院收治的、临床资料完整的脑卒中偏瘫患者117例,随机将患者分4组:A组30例,B组29例,C组28例和D组30例,所有患者均接受常规综合康复治疗,连续治疗4周。在常规综合康复治疗的基础上,B组和C组分别增加镜像视觉反馈训练和改良强制性运动治疗,D组则同时另加镜像视觉反馈和改良强制性运动治疗。主要观察指标包括治疗前、后的Fugl-Meyer量表(FMA)、上肢功能测试(upper extremity function test, UEFT)和改良Barthel指数(MBI)的评分。结果 4组患者治疗后的FMA、UEFT和MBI评分分别为:A组(26.37±3.44)、(43.30±3.46)、(56.27±4.76),B组(29.17±2.82)、(45.41±3.40)、(58.72±4.48),C组(29.46±3.16)、(45.71±2.37)、(58.82±3.89),D组(31.93±2.74)、(48.83±3.57)、(62.17±4.51),与治疗前组内相比,配对t检验显示差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);单因素方差分析发现,D组明显优于A、B、C 3组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);B、C 2组均优于A组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);B、C 2组间比较,差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。结论 在常规综合康复训练基础上,单独联合镜像视觉反馈或改良强制性运动治疗均能改善脑卒中偏瘫患者上肢运动功能和日常生活自理能力,但同时联合应用两种疗法,疗效更佳。

Objective To investigate the effects of mirror visual feedback (MVF) and modified constraint-induced movement therapy (mCIMT) on upper extremity function in post-stroke hemiplegics. Methods 117 patients with hemiplegia post-stroke were collected prospectively from December 2013 to October 2016, and randomly divided into the following four groups: group A (n=30), group B (n=29), group C (n=28) and group D (n=30). All patients were trained with conventional comprehensive rehabilitation therapy for four weeks, while the group B and group C were respectively trained with MVF and mCIMT based on conventional comprehensive rehabilitation therapy. Finally, the group D was simultaneously trained with MVF and mCIMT. The investigation duration was set as four weeks for all groups. The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) score, Upper Extremity Function Test (UEFT) score, and Modified Barthel Index (MBI) score were used as main index of clinical effects. Results After treatment, the scores of FMA, UEFT and MBI were respectively (26.37±3.44),(43.30±3.46),(56.27±4.76) in group A, (29.17±2.82), (45.41±3.40), (58.72±4.48) in group B, (29.46±3.16), (45.71±2.37), (58.82±3.89) in group C, (31.93±2.74), (48.83±3.57), (62.17±4.51) in group D.Comparing with the scores before treatment, the paired-sample t test showed that there were significant differences (P<0.05). The single factor variance test showed that the scores of the group D were significant better than those scores in group A, group B and group C (P<0.05); furthermore the scores of the group B and group C were significant better than the group A (P<0.05). However, there were no difference at those scores between the group B and group C (P＞0.05). Conclusion Based on conventional comprehensive rehabilitation, single combined with MVF or mCIMT may significantly improve the function of upper limb and activities of daily living (ADL) in post-stroke patients with hemiplegia. However, simultaneous combined with MVF and mCIMT will be more effective than the single one.

目的 探讨经皮穴位电刺激对脑卒中偏瘫患者下肢功能的影响。方法 41例脑卒中患者随机分为TAES组和安慰刺激组,分别为21例和20例。两组常规治疗相同。TAES组采用KD-2A型经皮神经电刺激治疗仪治疗,刺激部位选择患侧下肢的4个穴位(足三里ST 36、太冲LV 13、阳陵泉GB 34、昆仑BI 60),频率100 Hz,脉宽0.2 ms,强度为患者最大耐受强度为限;安慰刺激组接受治疗的部位时间和疗程与TAES组相同,但每次治疗时没有电流输出。治疗前、治疗2周、治疗3周分别用综合痉挛量表(CSS)评定踝关节痉挛,Fugl-Meyer运动评定量表中下肢部分(FMA)评定下肢运动功能,Berg平衡量表(BBS)评定平衡功能。结果 组内比较:治疗2周和治疗3周后与治疗前比较两组CSS、FMA下肢部分、BBS评分差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);组间比较:治疗2周和3周后,TAES组CSS、FMA、BBS评分优于安慰刺激组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 TAES治疗能减轻脑卒中患者偏瘫下肢痉挛程度和提高平衡功能,改善下肢运动能力。

Objective To investigate the effect of transcutaneous accupoint electrical stimulation(TAES)in enhancing motor and functional recovery of the lower extremity in subjects with stroke. Methods 41 subjects with first stroke were randomly assigned into 2 groups:TAES group and placebo stimulation group.All subjects received the same standard rehabilitation.In the TAES group.Model KD-2A stimulator was applied with 0.2 ms pulses,at 100 Hz within the subject's tolerance level on the 4 acupuncture points(ST 36,LV 3,GB 34,and Bl 60)in the affected lower legs for 60 min,5 days a week for 3 weeks;The time and the course of treatment of the placebo stimulation group was as well as the TAES group's,but no current output for each treatment.All subjects in the 2 groups received standard rehabilitation program.Measurements including composite spasticity score(CSS)for the spasticity of the ankle planter flexors,Fugl-Meyer motor assessment(FMA)for the lower extremity,and Berg Balance Scale(BBS)for balance were recorded before treatment,after 2 and 3 weeks' treatment. Results After 2 and 3 weeks of treatment,the CSS score in the TAES group was significantly lower than the placebo stimulation group(P<0.05)and the FMA score and BBS score in the TAES group was significantly higher than the placebo stimulation group(P<0.05). Conclusion Transcutaneous accupoint electrical stimulation significantly decreased ankle plantar flexor spasticity and improve motor function of the affected lower extremity.

       目的   探讨节律性听觉刺激对偏瘫患者步行功能的改善效果。方法   选择2022年1月—2023年12月河南中医药大学第五临床医学院收治的81例偏瘫患者，使用随机数表法将患者分为两组，对照组41例采取常规康复训练，观察组40例在常规康复训练基础上实施节律性听觉刺激，比较两组康复效果、Fugl-Meyer功能改善评定量表（FMA）、Berg平衡量表（BBS）、日常生活自理能力（ADL）、Holden步行能力、“起立-行走”计时测试（TUGT）、步态特征。结果   观察组总有效率为95.00%，高于对照组的75.61%（χ ² =6.032，P=0.014）。干预后，观察组FMA评分、BBS评分、ADL评分比对照组更高（t=5.564、4.377、4.949，P＜0.001）。干预后，观察组Holden步行能力评分比对照组更高，TUGT比对照组更低（t=3.953、5.184，P＜0.001）。干预后，观察组步长、步频、步速高于对照组（t=5.417、5.514、7.140，P＜0.001）。结论   偏瘫患者康复训练中实施节律性听觉刺激可提高康复效果，促使肌力改善，恢复正常的上下肢活动功能，提高患者的平衡能力和步行能力。

       Objective  To explore the effect of  rhythmic auditory stimulation on the improvement of walking function in patients with hemiplegia．Methods  A total of 81 patients with hemiplegia admitted to the hospital from January 2022 to December 2023 were selected for the study，and were divided into two groups by random number table method．The control group（41 cases）received routine rehabilitation training，and the observation group（40 cases）received  rhythmic auditory stimulation on the basis of routine rehabilitation training．The rehabilitation effects，Fugl-Meyer Assessment（FMA），Berg Balance Scale（BBS），Ability of Daily Living（ADL），Holden walking ability，Timed Up and Go Test（TUGT），and gait characteristics were compared between the two groups．Results  The total effective rate of 95.00% in the observation group was significantly higher than 75.61% in the control group（χ ² =6.032，P=0.014）．After treatment，FMA scores，BBS scores and ADL scores in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group（t=5.564，4.377，4.949，P＜0.001）．After treatment，the observation group had a higher Holden walking ability score and a lower TUGT score than the control group（t=3.953，5.184，P＜0.001）．After treatment，the step length，step frequency and step speed in observation group were significantly higher than those in control group（t=5.417，5.514，7.140，P＜0.001）．Conclusions  The implementation of rhythmic auditory stimulation in rehabilitation training of hemiplegia patients can improve the rehabilitation effect，promote the improvement of muscle strength，restore normal activities of upper and lower extremity，improve balance ability and walking ability，which is worth promoting．