目的 探讨产时超声管理妊娠期糖尿病产妇产程的应用价值。方法 选择2022年1月1日—2023年12月31日在佛山市高明区人民医院妇产科分娩的妊娠期糖尿病初产妇共100例。患者签署知情同意书后, 按照1∶1比例采用随机数字表法分为对照组和研究组各50例。对照组采用阴道指诊检查判断产程和分娩方式。研究组采用经腹联合会阴超声测量检查判断产程及分娩方式。收集两组初产妇血糖、血常规、分娩方式、产后24 h出血量以及切口情况, 新生儿Apgar评分。结果 研究组阴道分娩率高于对照组（88.0% vs 72.0%, P<0.05）, 而阴道检查次数（4.18±0.8 vs 6.82±0.8, P<0.05）少于对照组、不良事件发生率（4% vs 16%, P<0.05）低于对照组。相对于对照组,研究组血红蛋白水平较高（104.10±5.25 vs 100.30±4.78, P<0.05）、而白细胞计数（11.40±1.49 vs 12.04±1.66, P<0.05）以及中性粒细胞百分比较低（72.79±4.04 vs 75.01±5.53, P<0.05）。结论 通过产时超声监测判断妊娠期糖尿病初产妇产程,能够降低阴道操作引起的感染等风险,提高阴道分娩率,有效降低产妇感染,提高产妇分娩满意度以及舒适度,改善母婴结局。
Objective To explore the application value of intrapartum ultrasound for labor management of pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus．Methods A total of 100 primiparous women with gestational diabetes mellitus who gave birth in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department of Foshan Gaoming District People’s Hospital from January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2023 were selected．After signing the informed consent form, the patients were randomly divided into a control group and a study group with 50 cases in each group according to a ratio of 1∶1, using a random number table method．The control group underwent vaginal digital examination to assess the labor process and delivery method．For the study group, the labor process and delivery mode were determined using transabdominal ultrasound measurement．Blood glucose level,routine blood test results, delivery methods, 24-hour postpartum bleeding volume and incision conditions of two groups of primiparas, as well as the Apgar score of newborns were collected．Results The study group demonstrated a significantly higher vaginal delivery rate than the control group（88.0% vs 72.0%, P<0.05）, with fewer vaginal examinations（4.18±0.80 vs 6.82±0.80, P<0.05）and a lower incidence of adverse events（4% vs 16%, P<0.05）．Compared to the control group, the study group exhibited higher hemoglobin levels（[104.10±5.25]g/L vs [100.30±4.78] g/L, P<0.05）, but lower white blood cell counts（[11.40±1.49]×109/L vs [12.04±1.66]×109/L, P<0.05）and reduced neutrophil percentages（[72.79±4.04]% vs [75.01±5.53]%, P<0.05）．Conclusions Intrapartum ultrasound monitoring for assessing labor progression in primiparas with gestational diabetes mellitus reduces infection risks associated with vaginal procedures, increases vaginal delivery rates, effectively decreases maternal infections, enhances maternal satisfaction and comfort during delivery,and improves maternal-neonatal outcomes．
目的 对比分析在产程不同阶段对妊娠期高血压产妇给予分娩镇痛的效果差异。方法 选择2021年1月—2022年12月在福清市妇幼保健院接受无痛分娩治疗的240例妊娠期高血压产妇,随机分为在产程活跃期实施镇痛的对照组（n=120）和产程潜伏期实施镇痛的实验组（n=120）,比较两组产妇的产程时间、子宫动脉、胎儿脐动脉血流动力学参数、镇痛效果以及母婴结局。结果 实验组的第一、第二、第三产程时间分别为（389.71±35.05）（58.62±5.26）（8.71±0.69）min,略低于对照组的（403.72±42.19）（60.74±7.22）（8.91±1.62）min,但组间比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）;实验组镇痛前、活跃期、第二产程的疼痛评分分别为（9.18±0.13）（1.16±0.22）（2.83±1.16）分,与对照组的（9.22±0.16）（1.24±0.32）（2.72±1.09）分比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）,但在潜伏期,实验组产妇疼痛评分为（3.32±0.36）分,低于对照组的（8.11±0.32）分（P<0.05）;关闭镇痛泵后,实验组胎儿脐动脉阻力指数、搏动指数、收缩期峰值流速/舒张期流速分别为（0.58±0.09）（0.81±0.14）（2.31±0.29）,与对照组的（0.54±0.11）（0.79±0.13）（2.24±0.27）比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）,实验组产妇子宫动脉阻力指数、搏动指数、收缩期峰值流速/舒张期流速分别为（0.42±0.08）（0.64±0.08）（2.31±0.29）,均高于对照组的（0.39±0.06）（0.58±0.11）（1.65±0.08）（P<0.05）;实验组自然分娩、中转剖宫产、阴道助产例数及新生儿Apgar评分分别为87例、23例、10例、（8.88±0.15）分,与对照组的83例、28例、9例、（8.81±0.19）分比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论 潜伏期与活跃期对妊娠期高血压产妇实施分娩镇痛对产程时间以及母婴结局的影响不大,但潜伏期镇痛可改善产妇潜伏期的疼痛,可尽早缓解产妇痛苦,且对产妇子宫动脉血流灌注的影响更小。
目的 探讨责任制助产护理模式配合体位管理对高龄产妇分娩方式及产程的影响。方法 选择2023年6月—12月医院接收的高龄产妇68例进行研究，按照护理方式分为两组各34例，对照组为常规助产护理，观察组为责任制助产护理模式配合体位管理，比较两组分娩方式、产程、疼痛程度及护理满意度。结果 观察组阴道分娩率为76.47%（26例），高于对照组52.94%（18例），剖宫产率为8.82%（3例），低于对照组29.41%（10例）（χ2分别为4.121、4.660，均P＜0.05）。观察组第一产程（6.25±0.50）h、第二产程（0.79±0.21）h、总产程（7.15±0.63）h、宫口开大3 cm、10 cm时的疼痛程度（4.12±1.08）分、（6.29±1.25）分明显低于对照组（7.01±0.62）h、（0.96±0.30）h、（8.11±1.07）h、（7.84±1.45）分、（9.09±0.74）分（t分别为5.563、2.706、4.508、11.997、11.239，均P＜0.05）。观察组的护理满意度为97.06%（33例），比对照组的76.47%（26例）高（χ2=4.610，P=0.031）。结论 高龄产妇展开责任制助产护理模式配合体位管理可促进自然分娩，并缩短产程，减轻产时疼痛程度，降低剖宫产率，提高护理满意度。
Objective To explore the effect of responsibility midwifery nursing model combined with position management on delivery mode and labor process of elderly parturient．Methods A total of 68 cases of elderly pregnant women admitted to the hospital from June to December 2023 were selected,and they were divided into two groups according to the nursing mode,34 cases in each group．The control group was given routine midwifery nursing,and the observation group was given responsible midwifery nursing mode combined with position management．The methods of delivery,labor process,pain degree and nursing satisfaction of the two groups were compared．Results The vaginal delivery rate was 76.47%（26 cases）in the observation group,which was higher than 52.94%（18 cases）in the control group,and the cesarean section rate was 8.82%（3 cases）in the observation group,which was lower than 29.41%（10 cases）in the control group（χ2=4.121 and 4.660,P=0.042 and 0.030）．The pain degree of the first stage of labor（6.25±0.50）h,the second stage of labor（0.79±0.21）h,the total stage of labor（7.15±0.63）h,the pain degree of the cervical dilation 3 cm,10 cm in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group[（7.01±0.62）h,（4.12±1.08）points,（6.29±1.25）points vs （0.96±0.30）h,（8.11±1.07）h,（7.84±1.45）score,（9.09±0.74）score（t=5.563,2.706,4.508,11.997,11.239,P<0.05）．The nursing satisfaction of the observation group was 97.06%（33 cases）,which was higher than 76.47%（26 cases）of the control group（χ2=4.610,P=0.031）．Conclusion sResponsibility midwifery nursing mode combined with position management can promote natural childbirth,shorten the labor process,reduce the pain during labor,reduce the rate of cesarean section,and improve nursing satisfaction in elderly women,which is worthy of promotion．
目的 探讨腰-硬联合阻滞分娩镇痛方式对初产妇在产程进展及产时发热的影响,为临床实践提供理论依据。方法 回顾性分析2020年12月—2021年12月在广州市某三甲医院产科分娩产妇535例的基本资料。观察组（285例）采用腰-硬联合阻滞麻醉分娩镇痛,对照组（250例）选择常规无干预分娩。结果 观察组中的产妇第一产程和第二产程的时间比对照组更长,且产后2 h出血量高于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）,除此之外,2组产妇产时发热率比较差异也有统计学意义（P<0.01）。结论 腰硬联合阻滞分娩镇痛在一定程度上会延长产程,且产后2 h的出血量较多,同时也会增加产时发热的概率,存在一定不良反应,故需要密切观察,保证母儿安全。
Objective To investigate the effect of combined spinal-epidural block anesthesia on the progress of labor and intrapartum fever in primipara,and to provide a theoretical basis for clinical practice．Methods The basic data of 535 pregnant women who gave birth in the obstetrics department of a tertiary hospital in Guangzhou from December 2020 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed．The observation group（285 cases）was given labor analgesia,and the control group（250 cases）was given routine non-intervention delivery．Results The time of the first stage of labor and the second stage of labor in the observation group was significantly longer than that in the control group,and the bleeding volume 2 hours after delivery was higher than that in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant（P<0.05）．The maternal fever rate during delivery also had statistical significance（P<0.01）．Conclusions Combined spinal-epidural block anesthesia will prolong the labor process to a certain extent,and the amount of bleeding in 2 hours after delivery will be more,and it will also increase the probability of intrapartum fever,with certain adverse reactions．Therefore,close observation is needed to ensure the mother and child safety．
