目的 探讨血清乳酸脱氢酶（LDH）在中晚期肝癌患者接受靶向联合免疫治疗后的预后预测价值。方法 选取2022年1月—2024年8月在莆田学院附属医院肿瘤内科经病理和影像学检查确诊的中晚期肝癌患者作为研究对象。从医院的电子病历系统中收集患者的基线资料，随访截止2025年8月，并记录随访结果，包括患者的疾病缓解情况和死亡情况，以及无疾病进展生存期（PFS）、总生存期（OS）。采用Kaplan-Meier方法绘制不同基线LDH水平患者的OS生存曲线，并通过Log-rank检验比较生存曲线。同时，运用多因素Cox比例风险回归分析探讨影响中晚期肝癌患者在接受靶向联合免疫治疗后OS的相关因素。结果 结果显示，在50例肝癌患者中，基线LDH低于200 U/L的有15例，而高于200 U/L的有35例。与基线LDH＜200 U/L组相比，基线 LDH≥200 U/L患者PFS、OS更短，差异均有统计学意义（χ²分别为5.51、15.6，P值分别为0.019、0.017）。治疗8周后，与LDH降低患者相比，LDH升高患者OS更短，差异有统计学意义（χ²=13.2，P=0.04）。多因素Cox比例风险回归分析结果表明，基线LDH水平超过200 U/L是中晚期肝癌患者接受靶向联合免疫治疗后OS的影响因素［P=0.035，HR（95%CI）=5.03（1.12，22.54）］。结论 基线LDH水平较低的患者表现出更好的OS。基线LDH水平可以作为预测中晚期肝癌患者在接受靶向联合免疫治疗时预后的指标。 

   Objective To evaluate the prognostic significance of serum lactate dehydrogenase（LDH）levels in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma（HCC）undergoing targeted therapy combined immunotherapy．Methods Patients diagnosed with advanced HCC were selected in Putian College Affiliated Hospital from January 2022 to August 2024，diagnosed with pathological and imaging examinations results．Patient baseline data were collected from the hospital’s electronic medical records，with follow-up extending until August 2025．We documented outcomes such as disease response and mortality，along with progression-free survival（PFS）and overall survival（OS）．Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed based on baseline LDH levels，and the Log-rank test was employed for comparison．Additionally，multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was conducted to identify factors influencing OS in patients receiving targeted therapy combined immunotherapy．Results Among the 50 patients，15 had baseline LDH levels below 200 U/L，while 35 had levels above．Patients with baseline LDH≥200 U/L had significantly shorter PFS and OS than those with baseline LDH ＜200 U/L（χ²=5.51 and 15.6 for PFS and OS，respectively；P=0.019 and 0.017，respectively）．After 8 weeks of treatment，patients with increased LDH had significantly shorter OS compared with patients with decreased LDH（χ²=13.2，P=0.04）．Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis indicated that a baseline LDH level exceeding 200 U/L is an independent prognostic factor for OS in patients with intermediate to advanced HCC receiving targeted therapy combined with immunotherapy（P=0.035，HR 5.03［1.12，22.54］）．Conclusions Patients with lower baseline LDH levels demonstrated better OS，suggesting that baseline LDH can serve as an important prognostic indicator for advanced HCC patients undergoing targeted combined immunotherapy．

       目的   探讨、对比休克指数（SI）与血乳酸水平预测院前创伤性休克患者预后中的应用。方法   于2020年12月—2023年12月收治80例创伤性休克患者，均接受SI、乳酸水平的监测。结合监测的结果进行分组：乳酸正常组：乳酸水平在2 mmol/L以下，升高组：2 mmol/L以上；SI正常组：SI在0.9以下，升高组：SI在0.9以上。观察、记录患者入院7 d后的序贯性器官功能衰竭评分（SOFA），对多器官功能障碍综合征（MODS）情况进行评估。同时观察、记录机械通气、血管活性药物的使用和住院等情况。结果   乳酸水平升高组60例，正常组20组；SI升高组58例，正常组22例，女性乳酸水平、SI，与男性比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。是否发生多器官功能障碍者的年龄、性别、SI指数比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；格拉斯哥昏迷评分（GCS）评分［（4.22±1.53）分 vs （9.46±3.82）分，t=7.816，P＜0.001］、住院时间［（23.34±5.71）d vs （12.26±2.11）d，t=11.830，P＜0.001］、基础乳酸值［（4.75±2.36）mmol/L vs （2.04±1.11）mmol/L，t=6.721，P＜0.001］与发生MODS在组间对比差异有统计学意义。SI升高组的容量复苏收缩压＞80 mmHg（%）有27例，与乳酸水平升高组比较差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）（46.55% vs 18.18%，χ ² =12.237，P＜0.001）。乳酸水平升高组中，11例患者接受机械通气，乳酸水平均升高（P＜0.05）；9例患者使用血管活性药物，乳酸水平均升高，比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；38例住院患者，24例乳酸水平升高（P＜0.05）。13例患者接受机械通气，12例SI升高，比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；11例患者接受血管活性物治疗，8例SI升高，比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；39例患者住院，SI升高22例，比较差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论   针对重症的创伤性休克患者，当血乳酸水平升高时会大大增加MODS发生的概率，乳酸水平在对重症创伤性休克患者预后进行预测时，应用价值更高。

       Objective  To explore and compare the application of shock index（SI）and  blood lactic acid level in predicting the prognosis of patients with pre-hospital traumatic shock．Methods  From December 2020 to December 2023，80 patients with traumatic shock were enrolled，and their SI and levels of lactic acid were monitored．Patients were grouped according to the monitoring results：normal group：lactic acid level below 2 mmol/L，increased group：above 2 mmol/L；normal group：SI below 0.9，and increased group：SI above 0.9．The sequential organ failure score（SOFA）was observed and recorded 7 days after hospitalization，and the situation of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome（MODS）was evaluated．At the same time，mechanical ventilation，the use of vasoactive substances and hospitalization were observed and recorded．Results  There were 60 cases in the group with increased lactic acid level and 20 cases in the normal group．There were 58 cases of increased SI and 22 cases of normal．The lactic acid level and SI index in women were higher than those in men，with no difference（P＞0.05）．There were no differences in age，sex，SI index and the incidence of MODS（P＞0.05）．GCS score（4.22±1.53 vs 9.46±3.82），hospitalization days（23.34±5.71 vs 12.26±2.11）d，basal lactate value（4.75±2.36 vs 2.04±1.11）mmol L-1 were significantly different from those of MODS（t=11.830，P＜0.001；t=6.721，P＜0.001，P＜0.05）．There were 27 cases with volume  resuscitation systolic blood pressure ＞ 80 mmhg（%）in the group with increased SI，which was different from that of SI and lactic acid（46.55% vs18.18%，χ ² =12.237，P＜0.001；P＜0.05）．Lactic acid increased group：11 patients received mechanical ventilation，and the lactic acid levels of all 11 patients increased（P＜0.05）．Nine patients used vasoactive substances，and their lactic acid levels all increased，with no significant difference（P＞0.05）．Of the 38 inpatients，24 cases had elevated lactic acid levels（P＜0.05）．Thirteen patients received mechanical ventilation，and 12 patients had elevated SI，with no statistical significance（P＞0.05）．Eleven patients were treated with vasoactive agents，and 8 patients had increased SI，with no difference（P＞0.05）．Among the 39 patients hospitalized，22 cases had increased SI，and the difference was statistically significant（P＜0.05）．Conclusions  For patients with severe traumatic shock，when the blood lactic acid level increases，the probability of MODS will be greatly increased．Compared with SI index，lactic acid level has higher application value in predicting the prognosis of patients with severe traumatic shock．

乳酸以往被视为不具备生物学功能的代谢废物。随着人们对乳酸的深入研究,发现乳酸有多种作用。乳酸化修饰是近期发现一种与乳酸有关的蛋白质翻译后修饰过程。乳酸化修饰主要有两种,一种是与乳酸相关的直接修饰,另外一种是与丙酮酸相关的间接修饰。这两种乳酸化修饰均可能受到糖酵解、乳酸转运与堆积、蛋白质串扰以及神经系统等多方面的调控。乳酸化修饰可以通过直接或间接修饰组蛋白或非组蛋白,从而在肿瘤组织的代谢重编程、增殖、迁移及免疫逃逸中发挥着重要作用。乳酸化修饰的深入研究,有望为肿瘤的诊断和治疗开辟新的路径。因此,为了明确乳酸化修饰在肿瘤方面的研究进展,本文就蛋白乳酸化修饰的分子机制及其在肿瘤中作用的研究进展作一综述。

       Lactic acid was previously regarded as a metabolic waste product with no biological function. As lactic acid has been intensively studied, it has been found to have multiple roles. Lactation modification is a recently discovered protein post-translational modification process related to lactic acid. There are two main types of lactation modification：one is direct modification related to lactic acid and the other is indirect modification related to pyruvate. Both types of lactation modification may be regulated by various aspects such as glycolysis, lactate transport and accumulation, protein crosstalk, and the nervous system. Lactation modification can play an important role in metabolic reprogramming, proliferation, migration, and immune escape of tumor tissues by directly or indirectly modifying histones or non-histone proteins. The in-depth study of lactation modification is expected to find new pathways for tumor diagnosis and treatment. Therefore, in order to clarify the research progress of lactation modification in tumors, this paper presents a review on the molecular mechanism of protein lactation modification and the research progress of its role in tumors.