目的 分析疼痛护理对直肠癌癌痛患者不良情绪及爆发性疼痛的影响。方法 选取2020年4月—2020年6月我院收治的68例直肠癌癌痛患者作为研究对象,通过随机分组的方式将患者分为2组,对照组使用常规临床护理模式,观察组使用疼痛护理模式,对比2组患者的癌痛程度、不良情绪及爆发性疼痛的发生率。结果 2组患者在接受不同护理模式后,SF-MPQ评分相较于护理前出现了下降(P＜0.05),其中观察组的评分与对照组比较下降(P＜0.05),但护理前2组比较并无差异(P＞0.05);2组患者在接受不同护理模式后,功能维度评分和总体健康评分相较于护理前出现了上升(P＜0.05),且与对照组比较观察组得分升高(P＜0.05),2组患者在接受不同护理模式后,症状维度评分相较于护理前降低(P＜0.05),且与对照组比较观察组的评分下降(P＜0.05);服药依从率对比结果显示,观察组(94.12%)的依从性优于对照组(61.76%),组间比较有差异(P＜0.05);爆发性疼痛对比结果显示,观察组(8.82%)低于对照组(47.06%),组间比较有差异(P＜0.05)。结论 疼痛护理可以有效应用于直肠癌癌痛患者的护理中,其不仅可以减轻患者的癌痛程度,还有利于调节患者的不良情绪,降低患者的爆发性疼痛发生率,宜广泛应用及推广。

Objective To analyze the influence of pain nursing on the negative mood and explosive pain of patients with rectal cancer pain. Methods A total of 68 patients with colorectal cancer pain in June 2020 were included as research objects, and divided into two groups by randomized grouping.Routine clinical care was applied on the control group, pain nursing was applied on the observation group.The incidence of cancer pain, negative emotions and explosive pain in both groups of patients were compared. Results After applying different care plans, two groups of patients had a significant decrease in the SF-MPQ score (P<0.05), in which the score of the observation group was significantly lower than the control group (P<0.05), however, there were no significant differences before nursing (P>0.05). Two groups of patients were significantly improving in function scoring and the overall health scoring after receiving different care modes (P<0.05), and the observation group was significantly higher than the control group (P<0.05). The symptom dimension scores were significantly lower than before accepting different care modes (P<0.05), and the control group was significantly higher (P<0.05). The comparative results of the medicinal compliance of observation group (94.12%) were better than the control group (61.76%,P<0.05); outbreak pain comparative results showed the observation group (8.82%) was significantly lower than that of the control group (47.06%,P<0.05). Conclusion Pain nursing can be effectively used in the nursing of patients with rectal cancer pain.It can not only reduce the degree of cancer pain, but also help regulate the patient's negative mood and reduce the incidence of explosive pain.It should be widely used and promoted.

目的 分析于剖宫产产妇围手术期实施针对性护理对其切口感染率及不良情绪的影响。方法 选取2015年6月—2016年4月于我院择期行剖宫产术的102例产妇,通过随机数表法分为观察组与对照组,各51例。给予对照组常规护理,在此基础上观察组给予针对性护理干预。对比两组术后恢复情况、护理前后疼痛评分(VAS)、抑郁评分(SDS)及焦虑评分(SAS)变化情况,并统计两组并发症发生率、护理满意度。结果 观察组肛门排气时间、切口愈合时间、24 h睡眠时间、住院时间、下床活动时间均少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);护理前两组SAS评分、SDS评分、VAS评分间无明显差异(P＞0.05),经护理干预,观察组SAS评分、SDS评分、VAS评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);两组切口感染率、并发症发生率(1.96%、7.84%)低于对照组(15.69%、31.37%),差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);两组护理满意度对比,观察组(98.04%)高于对照组(82.35%),差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。结论 给予剖宫产围术期产妇针对性护理疗效确切,可缓解不良情绪,减轻疼痛感,促使机体功能及早康复,减少切口感染与并发症发生。

目的 探讨二孩政策后二次妊娠孕妇产前不良情绪及影响因素。方法 选取2016年2月—2017年1月我院收治二次妊娠待产孕妇93例作为研究组,选取同期收治初产妇50例作为对照组,采用汉密顿焦虑量表(HAMA)和抑郁状态采用抑郁自评量表(SDS)评估比较两组产期焦虑、抑郁情绪,同时按照HAMA、SDS评分结果将研究组患者分为A组(合并不良情绪)和B组(未合并不良情绪),采用单因素和多因素Logistic回归分析方法分析影响二次妊娠孕妇产前不良情绪危险因素。结果 研究组HAMA、SDS评分均高于对照组(P＜0.05)。妊娠合并症、不适应医院环境、未参加孕妇学校及胎儿异常均为影响二次妊娠孕妇产前不良情绪危险因素。结论 二孩政策后二次妊娠孕妇产前易合并不良情绪,影响产前不良情绪危险因素较多,产前应针对性进行预防和干预。

目的 探讨优质护理对大面积烧伤患者创面换药时对疼痛及不良情绪的影响。方法 收集我院大面积烧伤的患者,分为研究组和对照组。两组基础护理相同,研究组加用优质护理。对比两组护理前护理4周时焦虑评分,以及两组护理前、护理4周时创面换药时的疼痛评分。结果 ①研究组和对照组护理前焦虑评分结果比较无差异;研究组和对照组护理4周焦虑评分结果比较有差异。②研究组和对照组护理前创面换药时的疼痛评分结果比较无差异;研究组和对照组护理4周创面换药时的疼痛评分结果比较有差异。结论 本次研究认为通过优质护理能够明显提高大面积烧伤患者创面换药时的疼痛程度,对减少住院期间焦虑不良情绪有重要的意义。