目的 探讨电针联合低频电刺激对中风后上肢弛缓瘫患者上肢功能重建的影响。方法 选择2019年10月—2022年2月期间我院收治的100例中风后上肢弛缓瘫患者,按随机数字表法分为对照组（C组）和观察组（O组）,各50例。C组实施电针治疗,O组在C组基础上增加低频电刺激。对比2组的上肢肌群RMS值、徒手肌力、上肢功能。结果 入组时2组的腕屈伸肌群均方根值（RMS）对比无差异（P>0.05）,干预1、2、3、4周后,O组的腕屈伸肌群RMS值高于C组（P<0.05）。干预4周后,O组的徒手肌力优于C组（P<0.05）。O组的Fugl-Meyer -上肢功能、Wolf 上肢运动功能评定（WMFT）得分高于C组（P<0.05）。结论 在电针治疗基础上联合低频电刺激能显著改善中风后上肢弛缓瘫患者的徒手肌力,增加患肢的肌电值,促进上肢功能恢复。

目的 研究乳腺癌根治术中保留乳头乳晕对术后疗效、上肢功能及外观满意度的影响。方法 选取我院2013年3月—2018年5月40例早期乳腺癌的患者为研究对象,按照数字表随机分组的方案分为观察组和对照组各20例。观察组患者采用保留乳头乳晕的乳腺癌根治术治疗;对照组患者采用传统的根治性手术。比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量、术后下床时间、住院时间。比较两组患者术后上肢功能情况,采用上肢功能评定量表(disabilities of arm,shoulder and hand scale,DASH)评估。比较两组术后乳房外观满意度及两组患者术后并发症发生率。结果 观察组手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量及平均住院时间均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。观察组与对照组患者术后患侧上肢水肿及活动受限发生率相当,差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。观察组皮瓣缺血发生率为10.0%低于对照组40.0%,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。观察组术后乳房外观优良率为90.0%,高于对照组优良率60.0%,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。观察组患者术后并发症发生率15.0%低于对照组35.0%,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。结论 保留乳头、乳晕的乳腺癌根治术具有手术效果好、与传统根治术相比,对上肢功能损伤较小、美容效果更好,患者满意度较高等优点,值得临床应用和推广。

目的 观察镜像视觉反馈和改良强制性运动治疗对脑卒中偏瘫患者上肢功能的影响。方法 前瞻性纳入2013年12月—2016年10月在我院收治的、临床资料完整的脑卒中偏瘫患者117例,随机将患者分4组:A组30例,B组29例,C组28例和D组30例,所有患者均接受常规综合康复治疗,连续治疗4周。在常规综合康复治疗的基础上,B组和C组分别增加镜像视觉反馈训练和改良强制性运动治疗,D组则同时另加镜像视觉反馈和改良强制性运动治疗。主要观察指标包括治疗前、后的Fugl-Meyer量表(FMA)、上肢功能测试(upper extremity function test, UEFT)和改良Barthel指数(MBI)的评分。结果 4组患者治疗后的FMA、UEFT和MBI评分分别为:A组(26.37±3.44)、(43.30±3.46)、(56.27±4.76),B组(29.17±2.82)、(45.41±3.40)、(58.72±4.48),C组(29.46±3.16)、(45.71±2.37)、(58.82±3.89),D组(31.93±2.74)、(48.83±3.57)、(62.17±4.51),与治疗前组内相比,配对t检验显示差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);单因素方差分析发现,D组明显优于A、B、C 3组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);B、C 2组均优于A组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);B、C 2组间比较,差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。结论 在常规综合康复训练基础上,单独联合镜像视觉反馈或改良强制性运动治疗均能改善脑卒中偏瘫患者上肢运动功能和日常生活自理能力,但同时联合应用两种疗法,疗效更佳。

Objective To investigate the effects of mirror visual feedback (MVF) and modified constraint-induced movement therapy (mCIMT) on upper extremity function in post-stroke hemiplegics. Methods 117 patients with hemiplegia post-stroke were collected prospectively from December 2013 to October 2016, and randomly divided into the following four groups: group A (n=30), group B (n=29), group C (n=28) and group D (n=30). All patients were trained with conventional comprehensive rehabilitation therapy for four weeks, while the group B and group C were respectively trained with MVF and mCIMT based on conventional comprehensive rehabilitation therapy. Finally, the group D was simultaneously trained with MVF and mCIMT. The investigation duration was set as four weeks for all groups. The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) score, Upper Extremity Function Test (UEFT) score, and Modified Barthel Index (MBI) score were used as main index of clinical effects. Results After treatment, the scores of FMA, UEFT and MBI were respectively (26.37±3.44),(43.30±3.46),(56.27±4.76) in group A, (29.17±2.82), (45.41±3.40), (58.72±4.48) in group B, (29.46±3.16), (45.71±2.37), (58.82±3.89) in group C, (31.93±2.74), (48.83±3.57), (62.17±4.51) in group D.Comparing with the scores before treatment, the paired-sample t test showed that there were significant differences (P<0.05). The single factor variance test showed that the scores of the group D were significant better than those scores in group A, group B and group C (P<0.05); furthermore the scores of the group B and group C were significant better than the group A (P<0.05). However, there were no difference at those scores between the group B and group C (P＞0.05). Conclusion Based on conventional comprehensive rehabilitation, single combined with MVF or mCIMT may significantly improve the function of upper limb and activities of daily living (ADL) in post-stroke patients with hemiplegia. However, simultaneous combined with MVF and mCIMT will be more effective than the single one.