微创与传统拔牙术对下颌阻生智齿的疗效与并发症风险对比研究
Comparative Study on Efficacy and Complication Risks of Minimally Invasive and Traditional Tooth Extraction for Mandibular Retained Wisdom Teeth
来源期刊：
广州医药
|
-
发布时间：
收稿时间：2026/6/16 14:36:56
阅读量：0
- 作者：
-
- 关键词：
- 下颌阻生智齿；微创拔牙；传统拔牙；疗效；并发症
- impacted wisdom teeth; minimally invasive extraction; conventional extraction; efficacy; complications
- DOI：
-
- 收稿时间：
-
- 修订日期：
-
- 接收日期：
-
- 引用总数：
-
0
对比微创拔牙与传统拔牙在下颌阻生智齿治疗中的效果及并发症概率。方法：自2023年1月至2025年9月，选取110名下颌阻生智齿患者，采用随机数字列表法，将对象均衡地分为实验组（55人）与对照组（55人）。观察组行微创拔牙术（高速涡轮手机分牙+微创牙挺），对照组行传统拔牙术（骨凿劈冠+锤击增隙）。对比两组手术时间、术后疼痛程度、张口度及术中及术后并发症发生率。结果： 观察组施行手术的时间明显短于对照组[（25.38±5.47）min vs （31.65±6.83）min，P<0.001]；术后24h及7d的VAS评分均低于对照组[（3.52±1.21）分 vs （5.87±1.56）分，（0.89±0.65）分 vs （1.95±0.91）分，均P<0.001]，张口度大于对照组（均P<0.001）。观察组术中并发症总发生率（1.82%）显著低于对照组（14.55%）（P=0.009），术后并发症总发生率（3.64%）亦显著低于对照组（20.00%）（P=0.022）。结论：相较于常规拔牙方式，下颌阻生智齿的微创手术能显著减少治疗时间，减轻术后疼痛与张口受限，并显著降低术中及术后并发症风险，疗效与安全性俱佳，具备临床推广价值。
To compare the efficacy and complication rates of minimally invasive tooth extraction versus traditional extraction in treating impacted lower wisdom teeth. Methods: From January 2023 to September 2025,110 patients with impacted lower wisdom teeth were randomly assigned to an experimental group (55 cases) and a control group (55 cases) using a random number table. The experimental group underwent minimally invasive extraction (high-speed rotary mobile phone tooth splitting + minimally invasive tooth elevator), while the control group received traditional extraction (bone chisel splitting + hammer gap widening). The study compared operative time, postoperative pain (VAS score), mouth opening degree, and intraoperative/operative complications between the two groups. Results: The experimental group showed significantly shorter operative time [(25.38±5.47) min vs (31.65±6.83) min, P<0.001]. Postoperative VAS scores at 24h and 7d were significantly lower in the experimental group [(3.52±1.21) vs (5.87±1.56) points, (0.89±0.65) vs (1.95±0.91) points, both P<0.001], with greater mouth opening degree (P<0.001). The total intraoperative complication rate (1.82%) in the experimental group was significantly lower than the control group (14.55%) (P=0.009), and the postoperative complication rate (3.64%) was also significantly lower than the control group (20.00%) (P=0.022). Conclusion: Compared with traditional tooth extraction, minimally invasive tooth extraction can effectively shorten the operation time, reduce postoperative pain and limited mouth opening, and significantly reduce the risk of intraoperative and postoperative complications. The efficacy and safety are excellent, and it has the value of clinical promotion.
