[摘要] 目的 对比2种不同表面材质培养瓶培养的人脐带间充质干细胞(human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells, hUC-MSCs)的培养特性。 方法 采集10条新鲜脐带,每条脐带用组织块法分离脐带组织并贴壁培养12d,收集原代细胞,分别取2*106个细胞用225cm2高粘培养瓶(简称A组)和225cm2普通瓶子(简称B组)细胞培养72h至P1代,收集P1代细胞继续培养72h至P2代,实验重复五次,观察比较两组实验组的P1和P2代培养瓶的细胞镜下形态、P2代比较两组实验组细胞消化时长、细胞扩增曲线、检测表面标志物、三系分化潜能,分别收集细胞培养至P4代比较SA?β?半乳糖苷酶染色阳性率。结果 2组细胞形态均为扁平长梭形。 P2代A组细胞消化时间为(123.8 ±3.09)s,B组细胞消化时间(38.5 ±2.20)s,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。A组的P0到P2代细胞扩增倍数为(129.49±0.89)倍,显著高于B组(101.4±1.67)倍,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。A组SA?β?半乳糖苷酶染色阳性率(2.58±0.44)%显著低于B组(4.79±0.33)%,且均符合间充质干细胞的质量标准。结论 相同接种密度的条件下,高粘培养瓶比普通培养瓶扩增倍数更高,且细胞衰老水平更低,优化了培养体系和培养效率,提高了细胞质量。
[Abstract] Objective: To compare the culture characteristics of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (hUC-MSCs) cultured in two different surface-material flasks. Methods: Ten fresh umbilical cords were collected, and umbilical cord tissue was isolated using the tissue block method and cultured adherently for 12 days. Primary cells were collected, and 2×10^6 cells were respectively seeded into 225 cm2 high-adhesion flasks (Group A) and 225 cm2 ordinary flasks (Group B) for culture for 72 hours until passage 1 (P1). P1 cells were collected and further cultured for 72 hours until passage 2 (P2). The experiment was repeated five times. The morphology of cells at P1 and P2 in both groups was observed under a microscope, and P2 cells were compared for digestion duration, cell growth curves, surface marker expression, and trilineage differentiation potential. Cells were also cultured to P4 to compare the SA?β-galactosidase positivity rate. Results: Cells in both groups displayed a flat spindle-shaped morphology. The digestion time of P2 cells in Group A was (123.8 ± 3.09) seconds, while in Group B it was (38.5 ± 2.20) seconds, showing a statistically significant difference (P<0.001). The cumulative cell amplification from P0 to P2 in Group A was (129.49 ± 0.89)-fold, significantly higher than that in Group B [(101.4 ± 1.67)-fold, P<0.001]. The SA?β-galactosidase positivity rate in Group A was (2.58 ± 0.44)%, significantly lower than in Group B(4.79 ± 0.33)%, and both met the quality standards for mesenchymal stem cells. Conclusion: Under the same seeding density, high-adhesion flasks yield higher cell amplification, lower cell senescence, and optimize the culture system and efficiency, thereby improving cell quality.
1、[1]杨羽茜,徐丹,刘忠山. 改善间充质干细胞体外培养效率的策略分析 [J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2026, 30 (13): 3359-3369.
[2]潘杰,中山皓博. 干细胞与人类健康研究进展 [J]. 山东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 40 (02): 97-122.
[3]朱中焰,方李璇,傅玉婷,等. 牙周膜干细胞对细胞外基质刚度的力学响应 [J/OL]. 西安交通大学学报(医学版), 1-14[2025-12-23].
[4]Amitrano MJ, Cho M, Murphy WL. Screening of Biomaterials for Stem Cell Culture Applications. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2025 Jul 14;11(7):3816-3825. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5c00088. Epub 2025 Jun 9. PMID: 40489652.
[5]Rando TA, Brunet A, Goodell MA. Hallmarks of stem cell aging. Cell Stem Cell. 2025 Jul 3;32(7):1038-1054. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2025.06.004. Epub 2025 Jun 24. PMID: 40562035; PMCID: PMC12227283.
[6]宛莹,贲亮,官子楸,等. Corning CellBIND表面培养皿促进脐带源间充质干细胞生长(英文) [J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2014, 18 (10): 1547-1553.
[7]刘阳, 陈曦, 赵刚. 细胞培养表面改性对间充质干细胞粘附与分化行为的调控[J]. 中国细胞生物学学报, 2022, 44(5): 892-901. DOI:10.11844/cjcb.2022.05.008.
[8]Al-Azzam N, Alazzam A. Micropatterning of cells via adjusting surface wettability using plasma treatment and graphene oxide deposition. PLoS One. 2022 Jun 16;17(6):e0269914. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269914. PMID: 35709175; PMCID: PMC9202894.
[9]Rando TA, Brunet A, Goodell MA. Hallmarks of stem cell aging. Cell Stem Cell. 2025 Jul 3;32(7):1038-1054. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2025.06.004. Epub 2025 Jun 24. PMID: 40562035; PMCID: PMC12227283.
[10]Zhao H, et al. Identifying specific functional roles for senescence across cell types. Cell. 2024 Oct 4;187(21):5412-5429.e18.PMID: 39607003.
[11]Muñoz-Espín D, Serrano M. Mechanisms of Cellular Senescence: Cell Cycle Arrest and SASP. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:645593.PMID: 33834192
[12]Kang C. The unbearable presence of senescent cells in ageing. Nat Rev Genet. 2026 Jun;27(6):345-362.