您的位置: 首页 > 2024年8月 第55卷 第8期 > 文字全文
2023年7月 第38卷 第7期11
目录

危重产妇代理决策者的决策困境及影响因素分析

Analysis of decision-making difficulties and influencing factors of surrogate decision-makers for critically ill puerpera

来源期刊: 广州医药 | 907-912 发布时间:2024-09-24 收稿时间:2025/11/17 15:48:33 阅读量:25
作者:
关键词:
危重产妇代理决策者决策困境影响因素
critical maternalsurrogate decision-makersdecision-making dilemmasinfluencing factors
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1000-8535.2024.08.013
收稿时间:
2023-10-08 
修订日期:
 
接收日期:
 
引用总数:
0  
目的 了解危重产妇代理决策者的决策困境现状及其影响因素。方法 选择2022年10月—2023年10月许昌市中心医院产科及ICU的262例危重产妇及其代理决策者作为研究对象。应用一般资料问卷、母婴健康素养问卷、决策困境量表、决策参与期待量表进行调查。结果 决策困境量表总分为(39.38±14.58)分,其中信息提供和价值观明确总分为(13.91±7.16)分、社会支持和决策有效性总分为(20.41±8.25)分、不确定性总分为(5.06±1.96)分。多元线性回归分析发现,性别、学历、决策时间和脑卒中防治知识总分对危重产妇代理决策者决策困境均有影响(P<0.05)。结论 危重产妇代理决策者存在决策困境,医护人员需要根据代理决策者的人口学特征、疾病防治知识以及患者疾病特征进行决策辅助,减轻其决策困境,提升决策质量。
Objective To understand the current situation and influencing factors of decision-making difficulties among surrogate decision-makers for critically ill puerpera.Methods A total of 262 critically ill puerpera and their surrogate decision-makers from the obstetrics and ICU of Xuchang Central Hospital from October 2022 to October 2023 were selected.A survey was conducted using the General Information Questionnaire,Maternal and Child Health Literacy Questionnaire,Decision Dilemma Scale,and Decision Participation Expectancy Scale.Results The total score of the Decision Dilemma Scale was(39.38±14.58),with a total score of(13.91±7.16)for information provision and clear values,(20.41±8.25)for social support and decision effectiveness,and(5.06±1.96)for uncertainty.Multiple linear regression analysis found that gender,education level,decision time and total score of stroke prevention and control knowledge all have an impact on the decision-making difficulties of surrogate decision-makers in critically ill puerpera(P<0.05).Conclusions There is a decision-making dilemma for the surrogate decision-makers of critically ill puerpera.Medical staff need to provide decision-making assistance based on the demographic characteristics,disease prevention and control knowledge,and patient disease characteristics of the surrogate decision-makers,in order to alleviate their decision-making difficulties and improve the quality of decision-making.
1、 STEENBEEK M P,van BOMMEL M,HARMSEN M G,et al.Evaluation of a patient decision aid for BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers choosing an ovarian cancer prevention strategy[J].Gynecol Oncol,2021,163(2):371-377. STEENBEEK M P,van BOMMEL M,HARMSEN M G,et al.Evaluation of a patient decision aid for BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers choosing an ovarian cancer prevention strategy[J].Gynecol Oncol,2021,163(2):371-377.
2、 荣可欣. 急性脑梗死患者静脉溶栓治疗决策延迟现状及影响因素分析[D].辽宁:中国医科大学,2022. 荣可欣. 急性脑梗死患者静脉溶栓治疗决策延迟现状及影响因素分析[D].辽宁:中国医科大学,2022.
3、 王露,万君丽,郭文梅,等.原发性开角型青光眼患者决策辅助方案的构建及应用[J].护理学杂志,2023,38(12):5-9. 王露,万君丽,郭文梅,等.原发性开角型青光眼患者决策辅助方案的构建及应用[J].护理学杂志,2023,38(12):5-9.
4、 YUILL C,MCCOURT C,CHEYNE H,et al.Women’s experiences of decision-making and informed choice about pregnancy and birth care:A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research[J].BMC Pregnancy Childbirth,2020,20(1):343. YUILL C,MCCOURT C,CHEYNE H,et al.Women’s experiences of decision-making and informed choice about pregnancy and birth care:A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research[J].BMC Pregnancy Childbirth,2020,20(1):343.
5、 DURAND F,BOURGEAULT I L,HEBERT R L,et al.The role of gender,profession and informational role self-efficacy in physician-nurse knowledge sharing and decision-making[J].J Interprof Care,2022,36(1):34-43. DURAND F,BOURGEAULT I L,HEBERT R L,et al.The role of gender,profession and informational role self-efficacy in physician-nurse knowledge sharing and decision-making[J].J Interprof Care,2022,36(1):34-43.
6、 郭园丽,杨彩侠,郭丽娜,等.急性缺血性脑卒中溶栓代理决策者的决策困境及影响因素[J].中华护理杂志,2023,58(1):23-30. 郭园丽,杨彩侠,郭丽娜,等.急性缺血性脑卒中溶栓代理决策者的决策困境及影响因素[J].中华护理杂志,2023,58(1):23-30.
7、 徐小琳. 患者对医疗决策参与的满意度量表的编制及信效度考评[D].长沙:中南大学,2010. 徐小琳. 患者对医疗决策参与的满意度量表的编制及信效度考评[D].长沙:中南大学,2010.
8、 DEGNER L F,SLOAN J A,VENKATESH P.The control preferences scale[J].Can J Nurs Res,1997,29(3):21-43. DEGNER L F,SLOAN J A,VENKATESH P.The control preferences scale[J].Can J Nurs Res,1997,29(3):21-43.
9、 李玉. 早期原发性肝癌患者治疗决策辅助方案的构建与应用研究[D].上海:第二军医大学,2017. 李玉. 早期原发性肝癌患者治疗决策辅助方案的构建与应用研究[D].上海:第二军医大学,2017.
10、 O’CONNOR A M.Validation of a decisional conflict scale[J].Med Dec,15(1):25-30. O’CONNOR A M.Validation of a decisional conflict scale[J].Med Dec,15(1):25-30.
11、 王文静. 长春市某医院孕产妇母婴健康素养现状及影响因素分析[D].长春:吉林大学,2016. 王文静. 长春市某医院孕产妇母婴健康素养现状及影响因素分析[D].长春:吉林大学,2016.
12、 唐涵,刘维,肖涵,等.中青年乳腺癌患者手术方式决策困境及影响因素研究[J].护理学杂志,2020,35(20):14-17. 唐涵,刘维,肖涵,等.中青年乳腺癌患者手术方式决策困境及影响因素研究[J].护理学杂志,2020,35(20):14-17.
13、 SOKAS C,YEH I M,COOGAN K,et al.Older adult perspectives on medical decision making and emergency general surgery:“It had to be done.”[J].J Pain Symptom Manage,2021,61(5):948-954. SOKAS C,YEH I M,COOGAN K,et al.Older adult perspectives on medical decision making and emergency general surgery:“It had to be done.”[J].J Pain Symptom Manage,2021,61(5):948-954.
14、 HOESSEINI A,DORR M C,DRONKERS E,et al.Decisional conflict in patients with head and neck cancer[J].JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,2023,149(2):160-167. HOESSEINI A,DORR M C,DRONKERS E,et al.Decisional conflict in patients with head and neck cancer[J].JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,2023,149(2):160-167.
15、 孔晨力. 基于eCASH理念的ICU危重产妇早期泌乳方案的实施及效果评价[D].济南:山东大学,2020. 孔晨力. 基于eCASH理念的ICU危重产妇早期泌乳方案的实施及效果评价[D].济南:山东大学,2020.
上一篇
下一篇
出版者信息








《广州医药》公众号
目录