地西他滨联合沙利度胺对MDS患者的病态造血及疗效的影响

来源期刊：广州医药 | 17-22 发布时间：2022-04-12 收稿时间：2025/11/13 18:23:44 阅读量：16

作者：: 葛晓华,

赵小强,

关键词：: 骨髓增生异常综合征地西他滨病态造血促红生成素集落刺激因子; myelodysplastic syndrome decitabine dyshaematopoiesis erythropoietin colony stimulating factor

DOI：: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8535.2022.02.004

收稿时间：: 2021-05-12
修订日期：
接收日期：
引用总数：: 0

目的探讨地西他滨(DAC)联合沙利度胺对骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)患者的病态造血及疗效的影响。方法以本院自2014年6月—2020年5月收治的MDS患者为研究总体,行便利抽样法选择60例于收治期间行输血、抗感染及诸如促红生成素 (EPO)+集落刺激因子(CSF)等细胞因子治疗效果不佳的MDS开展研究,按完全区化原则设立对照组及观察组,予以对照组沙利度胺治疗,观察组则于对照组基础上施予地西他滨(DAC)行联合治疗,比较2组疗效、血象相关指标、病态造血改善情况及预后转归。结果观察组ORR为51.61%,与对照组的26.67%相比更高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);经治疗,2组血小板计数(PLT)、血红蛋白(HGB)、中性粒细胞计数(ANC)水平均见一定程度上升,骨髓原始细胞(bls)水平则见下降,观察组PLT、HGB、ANC相较于对照组更高,bls水平则更低(P<0.05);于2020年5月截止随访,随访时间8~96个月,中位随访时间68个月。于治疗及随访中行骨髓形态检查及染色体核型鉴别均表现正常。关于病态造血改善情况,2组T1率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组国际预后积分系统评分整体优于对照组(P<0.05);2组Ⅰ~Ⅳ级不良反应比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组5年总生存时间率为63.33%,相较于对照组的36.67%更高(P<0.05)。结论相较于单一沙利度胺治疗,应用地西他滨联合沙利度胺治疗MDS,疗效更为确切,且可改善血象指标,拥有一定T1率,且预后转归表现较好。

Objective To investigate the impact of decitabine (DAC) combined with thalidomide on dyshaematopoiesis and efficacy in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Methods Patients with MDS admitted to our hospital from June 2014 to May 2020 were selected as the research population.Among them, 60 MDS cases were selected by convenience sampling method, which had poor therapeutic effect with treatment of blood transfusion, anti-infection and cytokines treatments such as erythropoietin (EPO)+ colony stimulating factor (CSF). The control group and the observation group were set up according to the principle of complete block, and the control group was treated with thalidomide while the observation group was treated with decitabine (DAC) on the basis of the control group.The efficacy, hemogram-related indicators, improvement of dyshaematopoiesis and prognosis outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results The overall response rate (ORR) of the observation group was higher than that of the control group (51.61%vs 26.67%, P<0.05). After treatment, the levels of platelet (PLT), hemoglobin (HGB) and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) in the two groups were increased to a certain extent while the level of bone marrow blasts(bls) was decreased, and the levels of PLT, HGB and ANC of the observation group were higher than those of the control group while the level of bls was lower (P<0.05). The follow-up deadline was May 2020, and the follow-up time was 8-96 months and the median follow-up time was 68 months.During treatment and follow-up, bone marrow morphology examination and chromosome karyotype identification results were normal.Regarding the improvement of dyshaematopoiesis, the difference in T1 rate between the two groups was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The revised International Prognostic Scoring System prognosis score of the observation group was better than that of the control group (P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of grade I~IV adverse reactions (P>0.05). The 5-year overall survival rate of the observation group was 63.33%, which was higher than 36.67%of the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with thalidomide only treatment, the application of decitabine combined with thalidomide in the treatment of MDS had a more accurate efficacy, improved hemogram indicators, and had a certain T1 rate and good prognosis outcomes.

1、 DHILLON S.Decitabine/Cedazuridine: first approval[J].Drugs, 2020, 80(13):1373-1378.

2、李佳明,张苏江,严泽莹,等.单药地西他滨比较沙利度胺联合全反式维A酸治疗1型骨髓增生异常综合征[J].内科理论与实践,2018,13(2):98-102.

3、 ZHAO W H, ZENG Q C, HUANG B T, et al.Decitabine plus thalidomide yields more sustained survival rates than decitabine monotherapy for risk-tailored elderly patients with myelodysplastic syndrome[J].Leuk Res,2015, 39(4):424-428.

4、李光,任婧婧,张韵洁,等.地西他滨联合减量IAG方案治疗中高危骨髓增生异常综合征及其转化急性髓系白血病的临床观察[J].现代肿瘤医学,2017,25(18):2985-2989.

5、 JABBOUR E, SHORT N J, MONTALBAN-BRAVO G, et al.Randomized phase 2 study of low-dose decitabine vs low-dose azacitidine in lower-risk MDS and MDS/MPN[J].Blood,2017, 130(13):1514-1522.

6、邱莹玉.沙利度胺联合地西他滨治疗MDS疗效及对T细胞水平影响[J].实用中西医结合临床,2019,19(7):93-94.

7、王慧.地西他滨联合沙利度胺对高危骨髓增生异常综合征外周血调节性T细胞上程序性死亡分子-1细胞毒性T淋巴细胞相关抗原-4的表达[J].实用医技杂志,2020,27(9):1175-1176.

8、 YE X, CHEN D, ZHENG Y, et al.Effective treatment of low-dose decitabine in myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasms [J].Onco Targets Ther, 2017, 13(10):5425-5428.

9、 ITO T, ANDO H, HANDA H.Thalidomide teratogenicity and its direct target identification [J].Nihon Rinsho, 2015, 73(1):143-148.

10、林敏,陈宝安.沙利度胺对骨髓增生异常综合征治疗的研究进展[J].东南大学学报(医学版),2015,(3):469-471.

11、冷青,刘卓刚,张晓东,等.超低剂量地西他滨治疗老年中、高危骨髓增生异常综合征的临床观察[J].实用药物与临床,2017,20(10):1139-1143.

12、米瑞华,陈琳,陈玲,等.低剂量地西他滨皮下注射联合砷剂治疗中高危骨髓增生异常综合征效果及安全性观察[J].白血病·淋巴瘤,2019,28(7):396-400.

13、 KLIMEK V.Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) [J].Best Pract Res Clin Haematol, 2015, 28(1):1-2.

14、吴亚妹,曹永彬,李晓红,等.小剂量地西他滨序贯减量CAG方案治疗中高危骨髓增生异常综合征疗效观察[J].解放军医学院学报,2017,38(6):505-508.

15、叶吉明,辜学忠,储雨妍,等.地西他滨和沙利度胺两种方案治疗骨髓增生异常综合征的临床疗效[J].昆明医科大学学报,2020,41(3):72-76.

16、张永晓,付建平,刘晓,等.达那唑联合沙利度胺治疗骨髓增生异常综合征的临床研究[J].中国医院用药评价与分析,2019,19(12):1478-1481.

17、刘应彬,朱熙君.地西他滨联合三氧化二砷方案治疗老年中高危骨髓增生异常综合征的应用价值[J].安徽医学,2020,41(8):943-947.

18、 GERMING U, SCHROEDER T, KAIVERS J, et al.Novel therapies in low- and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome[J].Expert Rev Hematol, 2019, 12(10):893-908.

19、 DODILLET H, KREUZER K A, MONSEF I, et al.Thrombopoietin mimetics for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes[J].Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2017, 9(9):CD009883.

20、陆敏秋,鲍立,禇彬,等.地西他滨单药治疗中高危骨髓增生异常综合征和急性髓系白血病的疗效观察[J].中国全科医学,2020,23(35): 4443-4447,4453.