《广州医药》
点击关注官方服务号追踪稿件状态

【重要服务提醒】《广州医药》杂志服务号已上线稿件查询功能

各位作者、审稿专家:
本刊官方微信服务号新增稿件状态查询服务,无需反复登录投稿系统,微信即可随时查看审稿进度、修回通知、录用结果,稿件更新实时推送提醒,同步接收期刊征稿、学术资讯。

操作方式

微信搜索关注广州医药杂志服务号 → 点击菜单栏「绑定账号」→ 输入投稿邮箱完成账号关联;请关闭微信消息免打扰,避免遗漏稿件通知。

《广州医药》编辑部

广州医药杂志服务号
您的位置: 首页 > 2018年1月 第49卷 第1期 > 文字全文
2023年7月 第38卷 第7期11
目录

替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷对住院期间急性冠状动脉综合征患者出血风险的临床研究

Clinical study on risk of bleeding between Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in inpatient with acute coronary syndrome

来源期刊: 广州医药 | 22-24 发布时间:2021-12-01 收稿时间:2025/11/13 17:24:47 阅读量:156
作者:
关键词:
替格瑞洛氯吡格雷出血风险
TicagrelorLopidogrelRisk of bleeding
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1000-8535.2018.01.006
收稿时间:
2017-07-25 
修订日期:
 
接收日期:
 
引用总数:
0  
目的 比较替格瑞洛片与氯吡格雷片在临床住院急性冠状动脉综合征患者使用中的出血风险。方法 选择2016年1月—2016年11月于我院心血管内科住院的264例急性冠状动脉综合征患者。将患者随机分为两组,替格瑞洛组(A组)131例,氯吡格雷组(B组)133例。对两组患者出血情况进行比较。结果 住院期间两组患者均无严重心血管不良事件(MACE),均未见黑便及需要输血的严重出血。轻微出血患者数,A组:17例占13.0%(17/131),B组:3例占2.3%(3/133),A组轻微出血风险高于B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论 替格瑞洛轻微出血风险发生率高于氯吡格雷,均未见MACE发生及严重出血病例,临床使用中需注意此问题,并建议更多的临床研究出现。
Objective To compare the risk of bleeding between Clopidogrel and Ticagrelor in inpatients with acute coronary syndrome. Methods 264 patients with acute coronary syndrome who were admitted to our hospital from January 2016 to October 2016 were selected. The patients were divided into two groups randomly, 131 cases with taking Ticagrelor tablets and 133 cases with taking Clopidogrel tablets. The risk of bleeding of the two groups were compared. Results There were no serious adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) between two groups. Severe bleeding events were not obsereved in Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel group. The number of cases with mild bleeding were 17 in Ticagrelor group(13%) and 3 in Clopidogrel group (2.3%). The incidence of minor bleeding risk in Ticagrelor group was significantly higher than the Clopidogrel group(P<0.01). Conclusion The incidence of minor bleeding risk in Ticagrelor group was higher than Clopidogrel.There was no MACE occurrence and serious bleeding among two groups. We need to pay more attention to this problem in clinical use, and more clinical research should be proposed.
1、 谢文剑,陈绍良.替格瑞洛和氯吡格雷在中国冠心病患者中的安全性研究[J]. 中国循环心血管医学杂志,2015,7(5):593-559. 谢文剑,陈绍良.替格瑞洛和氯吡格雷在中国冠心病患者中的安全性研究[J]. 中国循环心血管医学杂志,2015,7(5):593-559.
2、 GURBEL P A, BLIDEN K P, BUTLER K, et al. Response to ticagrelor in clopidogrel nonresponders and responders and effect of switching therapies: the RESPOND study[J]. Circulation, 2010, 121(10): 1188-1199. GURBEL P A, BLIDEN K P, BUTLER K, et al. Response to ticagrelor in clopidogrel nonresponders and responders and effect of switching therapies: the RESPOND study[J]. Circulation, 2010, 121(10): 1188-1199.
3、 GURBEL P A, BLIDEN K P, BUTLER K, et al. Randomized doubleblind assessment of the ONSET and OFFSET of the antiplatelet effects of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with stable coronary artery disease: the ONSET/OFFSET study[J]. Circulation, 2009, 120(25): 2577-2585. GURBEL P A, BLIDEN K P, BUTLER K, et al. Randomized doubleblind assessment of the ONSET and OFFSET of the antiplatelet effects of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with stable coronary artery disease: the ONSET/OFFSET study[J]. Circulation, 2009, 120(25): 2577-2585.
4、 卢才义,周圣华.药物洗脱支架内血栓的治疗和预防[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2010:221. 卢才义,周圣华.药物洗脱支架内血栓的治疗和预防[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2010:221.
5、 中国医师协会心血管内科医师分会血栓防治专业委员会,中华医学会心血管病学分会介入学组,中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会.替格瑞临床应用中国专家共识[J]. 中华心血管病杂志,2016,44(2):183-192. 中国医师协会心血管内科医师分会血栓防治专业委员会,中华医学会心血管病学分会介入学组,中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会.替格瑞临床应用中国专家共识[J]. 中华心血管病杂志,2016,44(2):183-192.
6、 GURBEL P A, BLIDEN K P, BUTLER K, et al. Response to ticagrelor in clopidogrel nonresponders and responders and effect of switching therapies:the RESPOND study[J]. Circulation,2010,121(10):1188-1199. GURBEL P A, BLIDEN K P, BUTLER K, et al. Response to ticagrelor in clopidogrel nonresponders and responders and effect of switching therapies:the RESPOND study[J]. Circulation,2010,121(10):1188-1199.
7、 中华医学会心血管病学分会,中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会.抗血小板治疗中国专家共识[J]. 中华心血管病杂志,2013,41(3):183-192. 中华医学会心血管病学分会,中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会.抗血小板治疗中国专家共识[J]. 中华心血管病杂志,2013,41(3):183-192.
上一篇
下一篇
出版者信息








《广州医药》公众号
目录