目的 探讨基于肺康复的阻抗训练联合营养支持对老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病（COPD）衰弱患者肌少症及运动耐量的影响。方法 将2024年1月—2025年5月收治的80例老年COPD衰弱合并肌少症患者，分为对照组、观察组，各40例。所有患者均采取常规药物治疗，对照组予以营养支持，观察组在对照组基础上增加基于肺康复的阻抗训练。比较两组治疗前、治疗3个月后肌少症改善情况，运动耐量，肺功能指标，衰弱状态及生活质量。结果 治疗3个月后，观察组骨骼肌指数、握力、股四头肌肌厚度均较治疗前提高，且与对照组相比，观察组更高（P＜0.05）；治疗3个月后，两组6 min步行距离、日常活动代谢当量均较治疗前提高，Borg量表评分降低，且与对照组相比，观察组改善幅度更大（P＜0.05）；治疗3个月后，两组第一秒用力呼气容积（FEV1）、FEV1/用力肺活量（FVC）、最大通气量（MVV）均较治疗前改善，且与对照组相比，观察组更优（P＜0.05）；治疗3个月后，两组Fried衰弱表型评分、COPD评估测试（CAT）总分、圣乔治呼吸问卷（SGRQ）总分均较治疗前降低，且与对照组相比，观察组更低（P＜0.05）。结论 老年COPD衰弱合并肌少症患者采取基于肺康复的阻抗训练联合营养支持可改善其肌少症情况，提升运动耐量，并且提升患者肺功能水平，改善衰弱状态，提升生活质量。

       Objective To explore the effects of impedance training based on pulmonary rehabilitation combined with nutritional support on sarcopenia and exercise tolerance in elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease（COPD）and frailty．Methods Eighty elderly patients with COPD and frailty complicated by sarcopenia，admitted from January 2024 to May 2025，were selected as the study subjects and divided into a control group and an observation group，with 40 patients in each group．All patients received conventional drug therapy．The control group received nutritional support，while the observation group received additional impedance training based on pulmonary rehabilitation on top of the matched group’s treatment．The improvement of sarcopenia，exercise tolerance，pulmonary function index，weakness status and quality of life before and 3 months after treatment were compared between the two groups．Results After 3 months of treatment，the skeletal muscle index，grip strength and quadriceps thickness of the observation group increased compared with that before treatment，and compared with the control group，the observation group was higher（P＜0.05）．After 3 months of treatment，the 6 min walking distance and daily activity metabolic equivalent of both groups increased compared with that before treatment，and the Borg Scale score decreased．Compared with the control group，the improvement of the observation group was better（P＜0.05）．After 3 months of treatment，Forced Expiratory Volume in one second（FEV1），FEV1/Forced Vital Capacity（FVC）and Maximal Voluntary Ventilation（MVV）of both groups improved compared with that before treatment，and the observation group  was better than that of the control group（P＜0.05）．After 3 months of treatment，the Fried weakness phenotype score，COPD Assessment Test（CAT）total score and St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire（SGRQ）total score of both groups were lower than that before treatment，and the observation group  was lower than that of the control group（P＜0.05）．Conclusions Impedance training based on pulmonary rehabilitation combined with nutritional support can improve sarcopenia，enhance exercise tolerance，and improve pulmonary function levels，frailty status，and quality of life in elderly patients with COPD and frailty complicated by sarcopenia．

目的 评估基于NRS2002系统的多学科营养支持对直肠癌放化疗患者的作用。方法 选取2017年2月—2020年2月我院收治的96例直肠癌放化疗患者作为研究对象,根据入院建档顺序不同分2组,每组48例,对照组接受常规护理,观察组接受基于NRS2002系统的多学科营养支持。比较2组干预前后主观全面评定法(PG-SGA)评分、营养指标[前白蛋白(prealbumin, PA)、血清白蛋白(serum albumin, SA)、转铁蛋白(transferrin, TF)]、癌因性疲乏、生存质量(FLIC评分)。结果 干预后观察组营养状况优于对照组(P＜0.05);干预后观察组SA、PA、TF高于对照组(P＜0.05);干预后观察组癌因性疲乏低于对照组(P＜0.05);干预后观察组生存质量FLIC各维度评分高于对照组(P＜0.05)。结论 基于NRS2002系统的多学科营养支持有助于改善直肠癌放化疗患者营养状态,减轻癌因性疲乏,提升生存质量水平。

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of multidisciplinary nutritional support through NRS2002 system on patients undergoing radiotherapy and chemotherapy with rectal cancer. Methods From February 2017 to February 2020, 96 cases of rectal cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy and chemotherapy in our hospital were selected as the research objects, which were divided into two groups according to the order of filing, 48 cases in each group. The control group received routine nursing, and the observation group received multidisciplinary nutritional support through NRS2002 system. The PG-SGA score, nutritional indexes [prealbumin (PA), serum albumin (SA), transferrin (TF)], cancer-related fatigue and quality of life (FLIC score) were compared between two groups before and after intervention. Results After the intervention, the nutritional status of the observation group was better than that of the control group (P<0.05). The SA, PA, TF of the observation group were higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). The cancer-related fatigue of the observation group was lower than that of the control group (P<0.05), and the FLIC score of the observation group was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Multidisciplinary nutritional support through NRS2002 system was helpful to improve nutritional status of patients, reduce cancer-related fatigue and improve quality of life of patients with rectal cancer undergoing radiotherapy and chemotherapy.

目的 了解非结核分枝杆菌肺病患者营养风险、营养不足发生率,以及营养支持的应用状况,为临床实施营养干预提供参考依据。方法 对2012年10月—2014年10月在广州市胸科医院就诊的非结核分枝杆菌肺病患者(符合NRS2002评定标准)的营养风险筛查与营养支持状况进行回顾性分析。结果 402例患者中,营养不足和营养风险的发生率分别为35.8％(144/402)和66.7％(268/402);所有患者中,总体营养支持率为60.0%(241/402), 使用肠外营养与肠内营养的比例为3.2∶1;老年患者,女性患者,复治患者更是发生营养风险和营养不足的高危人群;存在营养风险患者的营养支持率为82.1%(220/268),不存在营养风险患者营养支持率为15.7%(21/134)。结论 非结核分枝杆菌肺病患者存在较高比例的营养不足和营养风险,肠外肠内营养临床应用存在不合理性;应推广和使用NRS2002营养评定方法和肠内肠外营养指南,作为实施营养支持的依据。

Objective To investigate prevalence of nutritional risk, undernutrition, and nutritional support of hospitalized patients with non-tuberculosis mycobacteria. Methods Adult patients in Guangzhou Chest Hospital from October 2012 to October 2014 were enrolled by fix-point consecutive sampling. Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS2002) was performed and nutritional support was evaluated in all patients. Results A total of 402 patients were enrolled.Overall prevalence of undernutrition was 35.8%, and nutritional risk was 66.7%. Among all the patients, the rate of nutritional support was 60.0%, including 82.1%of patients with nutritional risk and 15.7% of non-risk patients. Gerontal patients, retreatment patients and female patients are in the greater possibility of being expose to nutritional risk or undernutrition. Conclusion A large proportion of inpatients with non-tuberculosis mycobacteria were at nutritional risk or undernutrition.The application of parenteral or enteral nutritional support currently maybe inappropriate. NRS2002 and parenteral or enteral nutrition guideline are required to affording nutritional support.