《广州医药》
点击关注官方服务号追踪稿件状态

【重要服务提醒】《广州医药》杂志服务号已上线稿件查询功能

各位作者、审稿专家:
本刊官方微信服务号新增稿件状态查询服务,无需反复登录投稿系统,微信即可随时查看审稿进度、修回通知、录用结果,稿件更新实时推送提醒,同步接收期刊征稿、学术资讯。

操作方式

微信搜索关注广州医药杂志服务号 → 点击菜单栏「绑定账号」→ 输入投稿邮箱完成账号关联;请关闭微信消息免打扰,避免遗漏稿件通知。

《广州医药》编辑部

广州医药杂志服务号
论著

手术与保守治疗无骨折脱位型颈脊髓损伤的Meta分析

Surgical treatment versus conservative treatment for cervical spinal cord injury without fracture and dislocation: a meta-analysis

:119-123
 
目的 系统评价手术与保守治疗无骨折脱位型颈脊髓损伤的疗效。方法 应用计算机检索 PubMed、Cochrane Library、EMbase、OVID、CNKI、维普及万方数据库,纳入关于手术及保守治疗无骨折脱位型颈脊髓损伤疗效比较的随机或非随机对照试验。由2名研究人员独立对文献进行筛选、提取和纳入文献评价,采用 Rev-Man 5.3软件对两种治疗的JOA评分、ASIA运动评分、神经功能恢复率、ASIA分级改善进行Meta分析。结果 ①共纳入13 篇研究,共598例患者,手术和保守治疗组分别371例和227例;②Meta分析显示,与保守治疗相比,手术治疗后的JOA评分更高[MD=3.08,95%CI(2.71,3.45),Z=16.29,P<0.000 01];神经功能恢复率更高[MD=15.87,95%CI(9.28,22.46),Z=4.72,P<0.000 01];ASIA分级改善更明显[OR=2.3,95%CI(1.25,4.15),Z=2.76,P=0.006];在ASIA运动评分方面,两者无差异[MD=5.45,95%CI(-7.56,18.47),Z=0.82,P=0.41]。结论 对于无骨折脱位型颈脊髓损伤的患者,手术治疗更有利于患者神经功能的改善。
Objective To systematically assess the clinical efficacy of surgical treatment versus conservative treatment for CSCIWFD from previously clinical investigations. Methods A systematic search of all the studies published was conducted on the PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMbase, OVID, CNKI, VIP and Wanfang databases. Randomized and non-randomized controlled trials that compared between surgical treatment and conservative treatment for CSCIWFD were identified. Two reviewers independently screened the literature according to the inclusive and exclusive criteria, extracted the data, and assessed the quality of included studies. Meta-analyses were performed to assess variables including Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores(JOA), Neurological function recovery rate, ASIA impairment scale grade, ASIA motor scores. Results ①A total of 13 articles were included, involving 598 patients, of which 371 and 227 patients received sugical or conservative treatment. ②The results of the meta-analysis indicated that, compared with conservative group, surgical group has higher JOA scores[MD=3.08,95%CI(2.71,3.45),Z=16.29,P<0.000 01], better Neurological function recovery rate[MD=15.87,95%CI(9.28,22.46),Z=4.72,P<0.000 01], better ASIA impairment scale grade improvement[OR=2.3,95%CI(1.25,4.15),Z=2.76,P=0.006], and there were no significant differences in the ASIA motor scores[MD=5.45,95%CI(-7.56,18.47),Z=0.82,P=0.41]. Conclusion These result suggests that surgical treatment can improve the neurological function more effectively for patients with cervical spinal cord injury without fracture and dislocation.
出版者信息








《广州医药》公众号