《广州医药》
点击关注官方服务号追踪稿件状态

【重要服务提醒】《广州医药》杂志服务号已上线稿件查询功能

各位作者、审稿专家:
本刊官方微信服务号新增稿件状态查询服务,无需反复登录投稿系统,微信即可随时查看审稿进度、修回通知、录用结果,稿件更新实时推送提醒,同步接收期刊征稿、学术资讯。

操作方式

微信搜索关注广州医药杂志服务号 → 点击菜单栏「绑定账号」→ 输入投稿邮箱完成账号关联;请关闭微信消息免打扰,避免遗漏稿件通知。

《广州医药》编辑部

广州医药杂志服务号
论著

直接面向消费者的基因检测相关需求分析

Demand analysis of the directly to consumers genetic testing

:98-103
 
目的 通过对未进行过商业基因检测(NCGT)社区居民和直接面向消费者的基因测试(DCGT)消费群体的调查,分析市场基因测试产品的消费构成和消费者社会特征与基因检测消费的相关因素。方法 采用分层随机抽样方法对广州市居民和直接面向消费者的基因检测非患者居民进行面访式调查,采用Logistics回归分析商业基因测试的相关社会学因素。结果 NCGT社区居民中其家庭成员进行过胎儿产前筛查基因检测的比例(26.3%)较高、DCGT人群因常规健康体检包含基因检测项目而进行基因测试的比例(44.8%)最高,儿童天赋基因的测试比例(23.3%)也相对较高,两个群体均认为基因检测的目的主要是预防疾病,信任的检测机构为医院。DCGT行为相关的社会学特征有婚姻(已婚vs未婚:OR=5.591,P<0.001)、学历(专科以上vs专科及以下:OR=0.071,P<0.001)、年龄(30~49岁组vs其他组:OR=0.223,P<0.001)、工作(全职vs其他:OR=4.660,P<0.001)、公费医疗(OR=1.183,P=0.021)和商业保险(OR=2.121,P=0.004)。结论 公众将基因测试看成是预防疾病和控制遗传性疾病的公共卫生手段,需要在医院将基因检测和个性化治疗对应起来。
Objective By investigating consumer groups that have no-commercial genetic testing (NCGT) community residents and direct-to-consumers genetic testing (DCGT), to analysze the consumer composition of market genetic testing products and the factors related to consumer social characteristics. Methods A stratified random sampling method was used to conduct a face-to-face survey of residents and non-patients of genetic testing in Guangzhou residents. The logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the sociological factors of commercial genetic testing. Results The proportion of children in the NCGT community who had prenatal screening for prenatal screening (26.3%) was higher, and the proportion of DCGT populations that were genetically tested for routine health checkups containing genetic testing (44.8%) was the highest. The proportion of test genes (23.3%) is also relatively high. Both groups believe that the purpose of genetic testing is mainly to prevent diseases, and the testing institutions for their trust are hospitals. The sociological characteristics associated with DCGT behavior are marriage (married vs unmarried: OR=5.591, P<0.001), education (specialist vs. specialist and below: OR=0.071, P<0.001), age (30~49 years vs others, OR=0.223, P<0.001), work (full-time vs other: OR=4.660, P<0.001), public medical care (OR=1.183, P=0.021) and commercial insurance (OR=2.121, P=0.004). Conclusion The public regards genetic testing as a public health tool for preventing diseases and controlling hereditary diseases, and it is necessary to correlate genetic testing with personalized treatment in hospitals.
出版者信息








《广州医药》公众号