广州医药 ›› 2018, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (5): 67-70.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8535.2018.05.016

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

神经导航辅助神经内镜经鼻蝶入路切除垂体瘤的疗效评价

黄朝阳, 谢伟, 曹志恺   

  1. 广州市第一人民医院神经外科 (广州 510180)
  • 收稿日期:2018-06-08 出版日期:2018-09-20 发布日期:2021-11-29
  • 通讯作者: 曹志恺,E-mail:gzczk86@163.com

Analysis of resection for pituitary tumors through transsphenoidal approach with endoscopic neuronavigation assisted

HUANG Chaoyang, XIE Wei, CAO Zhikai   

  1. Department of Neurosurgery, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou 510180, China
  • Received:2018-06-08 Online:2018-09-20 Published:2021-11-29

摘要: 目的 探讨神经导航辅助神经内镜经鼻蝶入路切除垂体瘤的疗效。方法 将2014年10月—2018年4月我院接诊的20例垂体瘤患者纳入本研究,按照随机数字表法均分为观察组和对照组各10例,对照组患者行常规神经内镜下经鼻蝶入路垂体瘤切除术,观察组患者行神经导航辅助神经内镜下经鼻蝶入路垂体瘤切除术,比较两组患者手术及术后住院情况(包括手术时间、术中出血量及术后住院时间)、手术效果(包括显效率和总有效率)、手术前后血清内分泌指标变化情况(包括GH、PRL水平)以及术后并发症情况(即术后并发症发生率)。结果 观察组患者手术时间、术中出血量及术后住院时间均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组显效率和总有效率均略高于对照组,但两组间手术效果并差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组患者治疗后血清生长激素(GH)、催乳素(PRL)水平均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者术后并发症发生率无统计学差异。结论 神经导航辅助神经内镜经鼻蝶入路切除垂体瘤疗效显著,手术时间短、术中出血少、术后恢复快,可明显改善患者内分泌指标,值得临床推荐。

关键词: 垂体瘤, 神经导航, 神经内镜

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the efficacy of resection for pituitary tumors through transsphenoidal approach with endoscopic neuronavigation assisted. Methods From October 2014 to April 2018, 10 patients with pituitary tumor were operated in our hospital with neuronavigation, which were set as the observation group. Meanwhile, 10 patients with pituitary tumor underwent surgical treating through transsphenoidal approach without neuronavigation were set as the control group. SPSS 19.0 were used for statistical analysis to compare the difference between the two groups, including the operation time, blood loss, hospitalization time, hormone level, clinical total efficiency, and complications in the two groups. Results The operation time, blood loss and hospitalization time of the observation group were less than that of the control group, and there was statistical significance (P<0.05). The efficiency rate and overall efficiency rate of the observation group were a little more than that of the control group, but there was no statistical significance (P>0.05). The level of growth hormone (GH) and prolactin (PRL) of the observation group were less than that of the control group, and there was statistical significance (P<0.05). And there was no statistical significance between the incidence rate of postoperative complications of the two groups. Conclusion The efficacy of resection for pituitary tumors through transsphenoidal approach with endoscopic neuronavigation is significant, which may shorten the course, reduce the blood loss, quicken recovery of a patient from operation, and improve the hormone level. It is worthy to be recommended to clinical application.

Key words: Pituitary tumor, Neuronavigation, Neuroendoscopy