广州医药 ›› 2024, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (2): 132-136.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8535.2024.02.005

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

236例维持性血液透析患者的病耻感现状及影响因素分析

张萌, 高芳芳, 王俊博, 郑冬冬   

  1. 郑州市第三人民医院血液净化中心(河南郑州 450000)
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-25 出版日期:2024-02-20 发布日期:2024-03-06

Status quo and influencing factors of stigma in 236 patients with maintenance hemodialysis

ZHANG Meng, GAO Fangfang, WANG Junbo, ZHENG Dongdong   

  1. Zhengzhou Third People’s Hospital Blood Purification Center,Zhengzhou 450000,China
  • Received:2023-02-25 Online:2024-02-20 Published:2024-03-06

摘要: 目的 探究维持性血液透析(MHD)患者的病耻感现状,并对其影响因素进行分析。方法 根据便利抽样法,选取2020年2月—2022月10月在河南省郑州市第三人民医院血液净化中心进行MHD治疗的236例患者作为研究对象,并采用一般资料调查问卷、领悟社会支持量表(PSSS)以及社会影响量表(SIS)进行调查。根据SIS得分情况进行分组,采用Logistic回归分析行MHD患者病耻感的影响因素。结果 MHD患者病耻感得分为(65.03±10.68)分,其中病程较短、社会支持度低、家庭平均收入低、文化水平较低以及未参加肾友会的患者病耻感得分较高,病程较长、家庭平均收入高、社会支持度高、参加肾友会以及文化水平较高者病耻感得分较低(P<0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,患者文化水平、家庭平均收入、是否参加肾友会、病程以及社会支持情况是患者病耻感的影响因素(P<0.05)。结论 MHD患者病耻感得分处于中高等水平。指导患者正确认识疾病,多关注家庭收入较低患者,鼓励患者积极参与肾友会,为患者提供良好的社会支持,均有助于降低其病耻感程度。

关键词: 维持性血液透析, 影响因素, 领悟社会支持量表, 病耻感

Abstract: Objective To explore the current status of shame in maintenance hemodialysis(MHD)patients and analyze its influencing factors.Methods Based on the convenience sampling method,236 patients who underwent MHD treatment at the Blood Purification Center of the Third People’s Hospital of Zhengzhou City,Henan Province from February 2020 to October 2022 were selected as the research subjects.A general information survey questionnaire,Perceived Social Support Scale(PSSS),and Social Impact Scale(SIS)were used for the survey.Grouping based on SIS scores,logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the influencing factors of shame in MHD patients.Results MHD patients had a shame score of(65.03±10.68),among which patients with shorter disease course,lower social support,lower average family income,lower education level,and those who did not participate in kidney friend associations had higher shame scores.Patients with longer disease course,higher average family income,higher social support,participation in kidney self-help group,and higher education level had lower shame scores(P<0.05).The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the patient’s educational level,average family income,participation in a kidney self-help group,course of illness,and social support were the influencing factors for the patient’s sense of shame(P<0.05).Conclusions The shame score of MHD patients is at a moderate high level.Guiding patients to have a correct understanding of the disease,paying more attention to patients with lower family income,encouraging them to actively participate in kidney self-help group,and providing good social support to patients can all help reduce their sense of shame.

Key words: maintenance hemodialysis, influencing factors, percevied social support scale, stigma