悬吊运动疗法配合推拿治疗神经根型颈椎病临床价值

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-8535.2023.01.012

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探究对神经根型颈椎病(CSR)患者开展悬吊运动疗法+推拿的临床价值。方法选择2020年1月—2021年7月100例神经根型颈椎病患者,参考“数字双盲法”,分为对照组和观察组(均n=50);对照组患者为推拿治疗,观察组基于对照组基础+悬吊运动疗法;对比治疗结果。结果观察组临床总有效率94.00%较对照组80.00%高(P＜0.05)。2组治疗后VAS疼痛评分较治疗前均下降,且观察组较对照组更低(P＜0.05)。治疗前120°/s的等速度运动状态下2组峰力距(PT)、平均功率(AP)、屈肌峰力距/伸肌峰力距(F/E)比较(P＞0.05),经治疗后2组均显著改善,且观察组PT、AP、F/E指标较对照组均更优(P＜0.05)。2组治疗后颈椎功能障碍指数(NDI)评分、颈椎病临床评价量表(CASCS)评分较同组治疗前均改善,且观察组较对照组NDI评分更低,CASCS评分更高。结论针对CSR患者开展悬吊运动疗法+推拿治疗,有利于调节患者颈部肌群协调能力,减轻疼痛感,改善临床症状,促进颈椎功能恢复,实现理想的治疗效果。

关键词: 神经根型颈椎病, 悬吊运动疗法, 推拿, 临床疗效

Abstract: Objective To explore the clinical value of sling exercise therapy (SET) and massage in patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR). Methods From January 2020 to July 2021, 100 patients with CSR were selected and divided into control group and observation group (both n=50). The patients in the control group were treated with massage, and the observation group was treated with massage+SET, the treatment results were compared. Results The total clinical effective rate of 94.00% in the observation group was significantly higher than 80.00% in the control group (P<0.05). The VAS pain scores of the two groups after treatment were lower than those before treatment, and the VAS pain score of the observation group was lower than that of the control group (P<0.05). The peak torque (PT), average power (AP) and flexor peak force distance/extensor peak force distance (F/E) of the two groups were significantly improved after treatment, and the PT, AP and F/E indexes of the observation group were better than those of the control group (P<0.05). After treatment, the neck disability index (NDI) score and clinical assessment scale of cervical spondylosis (CASCS) score of the two groups were significantly improved compared with those before treatment, and the NDI score of the observation group was lower and the CASCS score was higher in the observation group. Conclusions SET+massage therapy for patients with CSR is helpful to adjust the coordination ability of cervical muscle group, reduce pain, improve clinical symptoms, promote the recovery of cervical function and achieve ideal therapeutic effect.

Key words: cervical spondylotic radiculopathy, sling exercise therapy, massage, clinical efficacy

刘华德, 葛敏恩, 黎健东. 悬吊运动疗法配合推拿治疗神经根型颈椎病临床价值[J]. 广州医药, 2023, 54(1): 64-67.

LIU Huade, GE Min'en, LI Jiandong. Clinical value of sling exercise therapy combined with massage in the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy[J]. Guangzhou Medical Journal, 2023, 54(1): 64-67.

参考文献

[1] 董继革,谢红志,寇亚强.悬吊弹拨法治疗神经根型颈椎病临床疗效观察[J]. 中国老年保健医学,2018,12(6):9-11.
[2] 丁文晶.悬吊运动训练结合颈椎牵引治疗神经根型颈椎病的疗效分析[J]. 常州实用医学,2019,35(4):216-218.
[3] 佘奕钿,佘妙芬,余申荣.颈椎牵引、针灸推拿及运动训练综合治疗神经根型颈椎病分析[J]. 实用中西医结合临床,2020,20(5):7-8,149.
[4] 杨旭.颈椎牵引结合针灸推拿及运动训练综合治疗神经根型颈椎病的观察[J]. 中国继续医学教育,2021,13(21):168-172.
[5] 阴涛,郑遵成,陈梦婷,等.悬吊运动疗法对神经根型颈椎病患者表面肌电频域指标影响研究[J]. 陕西医学杂志,2018,47(6):739-741.
[6] 刘秀磊.悬吊运动疗法对神经根型颈椎病的治疗效果[J]. 中国实用医刊,2020,47(8):81-84.
[7] 王乃针,陈昕,卢惠苹,等.悬吊运动疗法配合推拿治疗神经根型颈椎病临床分析[J]. 中外医疗,2019,38(24):173-175.
[8] 阴涛,郑遵成,高强.悬吊运动疗法(SET)治疗颈椎病的临床疗效观察[J]. 按摩与康复医学,2018,9(14):15-17.
[9] 罗恒超.主动抗阻运动疗法治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床应用[J]. 颈腰痛杂志,2019,40(1):99-100.
[10] 潘俊南,鲁泽鹏,王景续.颌枕带坐位颈椎悬吊牵引与非手术脊柱减压系统牵引治疗神经根型颈椎病临床效果比较[J]. 临床军医杂志,2020,48(4):457-459.
[11] 卢惠苹,王乃针,宋林,等.悬吊运动疗法对颈椎病患者颈部肌肉功能的影响[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志,2020,42(2):171-174.
[12] 郭志彬,谭啟恩,李冠彦,等.筋骨平衡推拿法治疗神经根型颈椎病的疗效观察[J]. 中国中医急症,2021,30(6):1070-1073.
[13] 马军虎,胡沛铎,周伟,等.基于平乐正骨之推拿手法治疗神经根型颈椎病效果观察[J]. 西部中医药,2021,34(4):122-126.
[14] 李明礼,张晓贝,谢磊,等.深刺针法联合手法推拿治疗神经根型颈椎病疗效及对实验室指标水平的影响[J]. 安徽医药,2020,24(5):881-884.
[15] 王红.针灸推拿联合常规康复疗法在老年神经根型颈椎病患者康复治疗中的应用疗效[J]. 实用中西医结合临床,2021,21(2):27-28.