广州医药 ›› 2019, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (3): 84-87.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8535.2019.03.022

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

实施家属预防接种认知干预对儿童预防接种效果的影响

黄凤佳, 张秀丽, 杨焕敏   

  1. 广东省东莞市企石镇社区卫生服务中心(东莞 523500)
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-29 出版日期:2019-05-20 发布日期:2021-12-17
  • 基金资助:
    越秀区课题项目(2016-W S-014)

Effect of cognitive intervention of family vaccination on children's vaccination effect

HUANG Fengjia, ZHANG Xiuli, YANG Huanmin   

  1. Community Health Service Center of Qishi Town, Dongguan 523500,China
  • Received:2019-01-29 Online:2019-05-20 Published:2021-12-17

摘要: 目的 总结预防接种认知干预对儿童预防接种效果的影响。方法 对2018年5—9月在东莞企石镇接种百白破疫苗的儿童家属按接种时间顺序分为对照组254名、实验组248名,对照组家属按常规方法进行预防接种,实验组在常规接种基础上,结合不按时接种、延迟接种等问题对幼儿家属开展多种多样的百白破疫苗预防知识、不良反应观察处理、接种注意事项等知识宣教和培训干预,总结两组儿童在按时接种、延迟接种、疫苗接种知识、不良反应表现与处理、接种注意事项知识的掌握、服务满意度等情况。结果 实验组幼儿按时接种率比对照组高,延迟接种率比对照组低,结果有差异(P<0.05);家属对疫苗接种知识、不良反应表现和处理、接种注意事项等知识的掌握比对照组高,结果有差异(P<0.05)。结论 实施家属预防接种认知干预管理能提高家属掌握预防接种知识和不良反应护理知识;提高儿童疫苗接种率和及时接种率,提高预防接种服务管理效果。

关键词: 预防接种, 认知干预, 接种效果, 影响

Abstract: Objective To summarize the effect of cognitive intervention on children's vaccination. Methods The family members of children vaccinated with DPT vaccine in Qishi Town of Dongguan City from May to September 2018 were divided into control group 254 and experimental group 248 according to the sequence of vaccination time. The family members of control group were vaccinated by routine methods. On the basis of routine vaccination, the experimental group carried out a variety of preventive knowledge and adverse reactions observation of DPT vaccine to the family members of children in combination with the problems of untimely vaccination and delayed vaccination. The knowledge propaganda and training intervention of treatment and vaccination precautions were summarized. The situation of two groups of children in timely vaccination, delayed vaccination, vaccination knowledge, adverse reaction performance and treatment, knowledge of vaccination precautions and service satisfaction were summarized. Results The vaccination rate of children in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group, and the delayed vaccination rate was lower than that in the control group. The results showed statistical difference (P<0.05). The knowledge of vaccination, adverse reactions, treatment and matters needing attention of family members were higher than that in the control group, and the results showed statistical difference (P<0.05). Conclusion Implementing cognitive intervention management of family vaccination may improve family members'knowledge of vaccination and nursing of adverse reactions, improve children's vaccination rates and timely vaccination rates, and improve the management effect of vaccination service.

Key words: Vaccination, Cognitive intervention, Vaccination effect, Impact