广州医药 ›› 2024, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (11): 1357-1362.DOI: 10.20223/j.cnki.1000-8535.2024.11.019

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

成人全麻腹腔镜下疝修补日间手术可行性和安全性分析

魏建昌1, 何杭晶1,2, 陈转鹏1, 钟俊斌1, 曹杰1, 王强1,2   

  1. 1 广州市第一人民医院(华南理工大学附属第二医院)普通外科,广州消化疾病中心(广东广州 510180);
    2 广东医科大学第一临床医学院(广东湛江 524023)
  • 收稿日期:2024-07-25 出版日期:2024-11-20 发布日期:2024-12-02
  • 通讯作者: 王强,E-mail:Eyqiangwang@scut.edu.cn,
  • 作者简介:魏建昌与何杭晶为共同第一作者
  • 基金资助:
    广州市第一人民医院前沿医疗技术(QY-E10)

Feasibility and safety analysis of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair ambulatory surgery under general anesthesia in adults

WEI Jianchang1, HE Hangjing1,2, CHEN Zhuanpeng1, ZHONG Junbin1, CAO Jie1, WANG Qiang1,2   

  1. 1 General Surgery Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Digestive Disease Center, Guangzhou 510180, China;
    2 First Clinical School of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang 524023, China
  • Received:2024-07-25 Online:2024-11-20 Published:2024-12-02

摘要: 目的 探讨成人全身麻醉(全麻)腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补日间手术的可行性及安全性。方法 回顾性分析2021年1月—2023年12月广州市第一人民医院收治的进行全麻腹腔镜下疝修补手术治疗的成人患者病历资料,根据患者住院手术模式分为日间手术组、传统手术组。日间手术组采用日间手术模式下全麻腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术,传统手术组采用传统入院模式下择期全麻腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补术,对比分析两组可行性(住院时间、住院费用、患者满意度)、安全性(手术时间、手术的出血量、手术并发症的发生率)等。结果 最终纳入199例病例,日间手术组52例(26.1%),传统手术组147例(73.9%)。与传统手术组相比较,日间手术组住院时间、术前住院时间、术后住院时间缩短,满意度评分升高,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在手术费用、住院总费用、术后24 h疼痛评分、手术时间、手术的出血量、手术并发症的发生率方面,组间比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 成人全麻腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补日间手术,能够缩短患者的住院时间,提高患者的住院满意程度,不增加手术风险和并发症发生率,是安全、有效的。

关键词: 日间手术, 全麻腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补, 可行性, 安全性

Abstract: Objective To explore and analyze the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair surgery under general anesthesia in adults.Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the medical records of patients admitted to a hospital from January 2021 to December 2023 who underwent laparoscopic hernia repair surgery under general anesthesia.The patients were divided into day surgery group and traditional surgery group based on their hospitalization surgery mode.The daytime surgery group underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair under general anesthesia in the daytime surgery mode,while the traditional surgery group underwent elective laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair under general anesthesia in the traditional admission mode.The feasibility(hospitalization duration,hospitalization cost,patient satisfaction)and safety(surgery duration,surgical bleeding volume,incidence of surgical complications)of the two groups were compared and analyzed.Results A total of 199 cases were enrolled,with 52 cases(26.1%)in the day surgery group and 147 cases(73.9%)in the traditional surgery group.Compared with the traditional surgery group,the daytime surgery group showed a decrease in length of hospital stay,preoperative hospital stay,and postoperative hospital stay,while the satisfaction score increased,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no difference(P>0.05)between the two groups in terms of surgical costs,total hospitalization costs,postoperative 24-hour pain scores,surgical time,surgical bleeding volume,and incidence of surgical complications.Conclusion sLaparoscopic inguinal hernia repair under general anesthesia during the day for adults is safe and effective.

Key words: daytime surgery, general anesthesia, laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, feasibility, safety