广州医药 ›› 2015, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (1): 23-25.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8535.2015.01.008

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

阿奇霉素序贯疗法治疗小儿支原体肺炎的成本—效果分析

吴少伟   

  1. 广东省佛山市南海区第五人民医院(佛山 528231)
  • 收稿日期:2014-09-18 发布日期:2021-11-30
  • 通讯作者: 吴少伟,E-mail:wushw@21cn.com

Cost-effectiveness analysis of sequential therapy of azitromycin on treatment of mycoplasmal pneumonia in children

Wu Shaowei   

  1. The fifth people's Hospital of Nanhai, Foshan 528231,China
  • Received:2014-09-18 Published:2021-11-30

摘要: 目的 评价阿奇霉素序贯疗法治疗小儿支原体肺炎的临床疗效及药物经济学效果。方法 将我院儿科于2011年3月—2013年8月收治的522例支原体肺炎患儿随机分为静滴组(n=265)和序贯组(n=287),两组均给予阿奇霉素进行疗程为5 d的治疗,静滴组采用静脉滴注的给药方法进行治疗,序贯组采用静脉滴注2 d后口服序贯给药3 d的方法进行治疗,运用药物经济学原理对两种给药方案进行成本-效果分析。结果 静滴组和序贯组的总有效率分别为94.0%(249/265)和92.7%(266/287),两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但静滴组的成本高于序贯组(P<0.01);静滴组和序贯组的不良反应发生率分别为34.7%(92/265)和26.9%(76/287),两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 采用序贯疗法治疗小儿支原体肺炎符合安全、有效、经济的临床用药原则,值得临床广泛推荐。

关键词: 阿奇霉素, 支原体肺炎, 成本-效果分析, 序贯疗法

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and pharmacoeconomic effect of sequential therapy of azithroycin on treatment of community mycoplasmal pneumonia(MP)in chindren. Methods 522 cases with MP from March 2011 to August 2013 in pediatrics department of our hospital were randomly divided into intravenous-drip group(n=265)and sequential-therapy group(n=287),and both two groups were treated by azithromycin for 5 days.The intravenous-drip group was treated with intravenous drip of azithromycin,and the sequential-therapy group was treated with azithromycin in the way of intravenous drip for 2 days and oral-taken for 3 days.The two treatments were cost-effectiveness analyzed by pharmacoeconomic theory. Results The total efficiency of the sequential-therapy group and intravenous-drip group were 94.0%(249/265)and 92.7%(266/287),respectively.There was no different between the sequential-therapy group and the intravenous-drip group(P<0.05).But the cost in intravenous-drip group was higher than that in sequential-therapy group(P<0.01).The incidence of adverse reaction of the sequential-therapy group and intravenous-drip group were 94.0% 34.7%(92/265)and 26.9%(76/287),respectively.And it was significant different between the two groups(P<0.05). Conclusions The treatment of sequential therapy of azithromycin is safety,effective and economical.And it is worthy to be widely recommended in clinical.

Key words: Azithroycin, Mycoplasmal pneumonia, Cost-Effectiveness analysis, Sequential therapy