连续护理在提高乳腺癌保乳患者生存质量中的应用效果分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-8535.2015.06.019

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨连续护理在提高乳腺癌保乳患者生存质量中的应用效果,号召我院为病人提供持续性、连续性护理开展APN排班。方法随机抽取2011年1月—2014年1月我院收治的117例乳腺癌患者的临床资料。观察两组患者术后生存质量、焦虑情况、抑郁情况、术后上肢水肿情况。结果两组患者术后1周生存质量比较,差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05);观察组术后1个月、3个月、6个月、1年生存质量高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。两组患者术后1周焦虑情况比较,差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05);观察组术后1个月、3个月、6个月、1年忧郁情况优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。观察组患者术后上肢水肿情况优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。结论连续护理在提高乳腺癌保乳患者生存质量中的应用效果较好,能够改善患者术后生存质量、焦虑抑郁情况、术后上肢水肿情况,值得临床推广。

关键词: 连续护理, 乳腺癌, 生存质量, 应用效果

Abstract: Objective To explore the effects of continuous nursing intervention on the quality of life for breast cancer patients after breast conserving therapy. Methods 117 cases of patients with breast cancer were randomly divided into observation group(59 cases) and control group(58 cases). The control group were cared by routine postoperative care, including health education. On the basis of the control group, the observation group were cared by continuous nursing intervention, including cognitive intervention, psychological intervention, social support, life care, functional exercise, the prevention of complications and discharge instruction. The quality of life, anxiety situation, depression amd upper limb edema were compared in the two groups. Results There has no significant difference on the quality of life after 1 week in the two groups(P＞0.05); The quality of life after 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year for the observation group were higher than the control group(P＜0.05). There has no significant difference on the anxiety situation after 1 week in the two groups(P＞0.05); The anxiety situation after 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year for the observation group were higher than the control group(P＜0.05). The depression situation after 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year for the observation group were higher than the control group(P＜0.05). The upper limb edema situation for the observation group were better than the control group(P＜0.05). Conclusion The effects of continuous nursing intervention on the quality of life for breast cancer patients after breast conserving therapy is good. It can improve the quality of life, situations of anxiety, depression and upper limb edema. It is worthy of clinical promotion.

Key words: Continuous nursing, Breast cancer, Quality of life, Clinical effects

张娇, 李燕英. 连续护理在提高乳腺癌保乳患者生存质量中的应用效果分析[J]. 广州医药, 2015, 46(6): 56-58.

Zhang Jiao, Li Yanying. The effects of continuous nursing intervention on the quality of life for breast cancer patients after breast conserving therapy[J]. Guangzhou Medical Journal, 2015, 46(6): 56-58.

[1]	翁沛华. 超声-微泡介导miR-128通过调节PTEN抑制乳腺癌细胞阿霉素耐药[J]. 广州医药, 2021, 52(6): 35-38.
[2]	黎颂铭, 郝俊文, 洪云, 李良. 槐耳颗粒用于乳腺癌术后辅助化疗期对内分泌激素及生存期的影响[J]. 广州医药, 2021, 52(5): 109-112.
[3]	叶晔, 费伟强, 冯冠. SEER数据库中晚期三阴性乳腺癌的危险因素及预后分析[J]. 广州医药, 2021, 52(1): 26-34.
[4]	李淑怡, 黄玉珍, 蓝秀万. 乳腺癌关键基因的生物信息学分析[J]. 广州医药, 2021, 52(1): 65-71.
[5]	宋长龙, 汪金锋, 张军, 罗晓蓉, 李勇蔡永广, 黄瑞文, 陈焕伟, 李太东, 康静波. 晚期胰腺癌超级伽玛刀治疗的临床研究[J]. 广州医药, 2020, 51(6): 62-65.
[6]	罗伟平, 何雩霏, 钟礼信, 王轶. 2008—2019年广州某综合医院肿瘤病例分析[J]. 广州医药, 2020, 51(4): 114-118.
[7]	黄毅敏, 向炳辉, 王小锋, 岑川, 邓永康. 乳腺癌根治术中保留乳头乳晕对术后疗效、上肢功能及外观满意度的影响[J]. 广州医药, 2020, 51(1): 121-124.
[8]	许素真. 阿那曲唑和他莫昔芬治疗激素受体阳性绝经后转移性乳腺癌的疗效和安全性对比[J]. 广州医药, 2018, 49(6): 118-120.
[9]	魏宜霖, 柳建华, 杨毓雯. 乳腺癌超声多参数及临床病理学特点与腋窝淋巴结转移的关系[J]. 广州医药, 2018, 49(5): 89-93.
[10]	曾志坚, 陈玉兰, 邝碧茹, 练英妮, 李曙平. 6野切线射野方式用于左侧乳腺癌根治术后放疗的临床研究[J]. 广州医药, 2018, 49(4): 91-93.
[11]	王雷, 高琳璐. 乳腺癌组织中SIRT1的表达观察[J]. 广州医药, 2017, 48(4): 17-19.
[12]	雷叶青, 李海涛, 曹健, 何仕青, 王海裕, 黎春华, 许金凤. 卡培他滨单药维持治疗在晚期乳腺癌的疗效观察[J]. 广州医药, 2017, 48(3): 102-105.
[13]	金科, 朱剑梅, 邱发麒. BAG-1基因与乳腺癌TAM治疗敏感性的相关性研究[J]. 广州医药, 2017, 48(1): 5-8.
[14]	位红芹, 余美玲, 韦英丽, 肖妮娜, 柳建华. 微泡增强的超声空化对荷瘤兔乳腺癌作用效果的研究[J]. 广州医药, 2016, 47(2): 32-34.
[15]	叶志东, 黄迪, 黄宇, 张强, 麦振豪, 赵俐, 古维立. B超弹性成像监测下应用吉西他滨耐药乳腺癌细胞4T1构建裸鼠乳腺癌肝转移模型[J]. 广州医药, 2016, 47(1): 49-52.

连续护理在提高乳腺癌保乳患者生存质量中的应用效果分析

The effects of continuous nursing intervention on the quality of life for breast cancer patients after breast conserving therapy

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价