广州医药 ›› 2015, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (6): 41-43.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8535.2015.06.013

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

基层医院ICU呼吸机相关性肺炎的危险因素与病原学分析

江美嫦, 陈文标, 关健明, 梁秋霞   

  1. 广东省佛山市南海区第六人民医院 重症监护室(佛山 528248)
  • 收稿日期:2015-04-11 发布日期:2021-11-30

Analysis of pathogens and risk factors for ventilator-associated pneumonia in a general intensive care unit of a primary hospital

Jiang Meichang, Chen Wenbiao, Guan Jianming, et al   

  1. Department of Intensive Care Unit,The Sixth Nanhai District People's Hospital,Foshan 528248,China
  • Received:2015-04-11 Published:2021-11-30

摘要: 目的 分析基层医院ICU VAP的危险因素及病原学情况。方法 回顾性分析2013年1月—2014年12月本院ICU收治的机械通气>48 h 的118例患者,分VAP组和非VAP组,分析VAP的危险因素及病原学情况。结果 VAP组与非VAP组在紧急气管插管,机械通气时间,抗生素种类,糖皮质激素,PPI及镇静药物使用>7天,返流,MODS,ICU停留时间的项目,两组比较差异有统计学意义。紧急插管:52.2% vs 31.9%,P=0.029;机械通气时间:(9.8±3.5)vs(7.3±2.8)天,P=0.038;抗生素种类>2种:52.2% vs 26.4%,P=0.005;使用糖皮质激素:56.5% vs 27.0%,P=0.001;PPI使用>7天:65.2% vs 40.3%,P=0.008;镇静药物使用>7天:58.7% vs 38.9%,P=0.035;返流:50% vs 29.2%,P=0.022;合并MODS:47.8% vs 22.2%,P=0.004;ICU停留时间:(13.6±6.6)vs(10.2±5.3)天,P=0.023。使用糖皮质激素、机械通气时间、ICU停留时间是VAP的独立危险因素(多因素Logistic分析的OR值:2.481、1.234、1.075)。基层医院ICU VAP主要以革兰氏阴性菌(82.3%)为主。结论 使用激素、机械通气时间、ICU停留时间是基层医院ICU VAP的独立危险因素;而VAP病原菌感染以G-菌为主,可经验使用G-菌敏感的抗生素。

关键词: 基层医院ICU, 呼吸机相关性肺炎, 危险因素, 病原学

Abstract: Objective To analyze pathogens and risk factors of VAP in a general ICU of a primary hospital. Methods Totally 112 patients(from 2013-01 to 2014-12) under mechanical ventilation over 48 h were retrospectively studied. The patients were assigned into VAP group and non-VAP group. The independent risk factors and pathogens of VAP were analyzed. Results There was significant difference between VAP group and non-VAP group in terms of emergent tracheal intubation, MV time, types of antibiotics used, the use of hormones,the use of PPI and sedative drugs for more than 7 days, regurgitation, MODS, ICU stay time. Emergent tracheal intubation:52.2% vs 31.9%,P=0.029;MV time:9.8±3.5day vs 7.3±2.8day,P=0.038;types of antibiotics used > 2 kinds:52.2% vs 26.4%,P=0.005;the use of hormones:56.5% vs 27.0%,P=0.001;the use of PPI >7day:65.2% vs 40.3%,P=0.008;the use of sedative drugs >7day:58.7% vs 38.9%,P=0.035;regurgitation:50% vs 29.2%,P=0.022;MODS:47.8% vs 22.2%,P=0.004;ICU stay time:13.6±6.6day vs 10.2±5.3day,P=0.023. The use of hormones,MV time, ICU stay time were the independent risk factors of VAP[odds ratio(OR) of multivariate logistic regression:2.481、1.234、1.075]. The main pathogens of VAP were gram-negative bacteria (82.3%). Conclusion The study shows that the use of hormones,MV time, ICU stay time are the independent risk factors of VAP; gram-negative bacteria are the main pathogens of VAP. Once VAP occurs, they can be treated with anti-gram-negative bacteria antibiotics.

Key words: Primary hospital, VAP, Risk factors, Pathogens