医院-社区-家庭一体化康复护理模式干预对慢性创面患者生活质量及创面愈合的影响研究

doi:10.20223/j.cnki.1000-8535.2025.05.018

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的评估医院-社区-家庭一体化康复护理模式对慢性创面患者生活质量及创面愈合的潜在影响。方法选择2023年1月—2024年6月在广州市第一人民医院接受治疗的慢性创面患者80例作为研究对象,所有患者在住院期间均接受基于溃疡面积、深度及是否合并感染等因素的综合治疗,包括彻底清创、创缘处理、负压治疗、感染控制等治疗,并接受常规护理。出院前,通过随机数字表法将患者分为两组,每组40例。两组患者在住院期间均接受常规护理,出院后,对照组接受延续护理并定期复查。干预组40例患者在出院后接受医院-社区-家庭一体化康复护理模式。入组时及护理3个月后,使用生活质量调查表（SF-36）对患者生活质量和创面愈合率进行评估。结果干预组创面愈合率为（32.61±4.26）%,高于对照组（11.48±1.04）%,差异具有统计学意义（t=19.473,P<0.05）。两组患者在护理3个月后的数字评定量表评分和创面疼痛频率评分均较入组时降低（P<0.05）。其中干预组护理3个月后的创面VAS评分为（1.82±0.17）分,创面疼痛频率评分为（1.28±0.25）分;而对照组分别为（3.91±0.22）分和（2.63±0.37）分,干预组低于对照组（P<0.05）。此外,干预组在护理后3个月的总体健康、生理功能、生理职能、精神健康、情感功能、社会功能评分均高于对照组（P<0.05）。在居家3个月期间,干预组的感染发生率为5.00%,而对照组为17.50%,干预组感染发生率低于对照组（χ²=3.781,P<0.05）。结论本研究表明,医院-社区-家庭一体化康复护理模式干预能够促进慢性创面患者的创面愈合,降低居家期间感染的风险,并提升患者的生活质量。

关键词: 医院-社区-家庭一体化护理模式, 慢性创面, 生活质量, 创面愈合

Abstract: Objective To assess the potential impact of the integrated hospital-community-home rehabilitation nursing model on the quality of life and wound healing in patients with chronic wounds．Methods A total of 80 patients with chronic wounds treated at the Guangzhou First People’s Hospital from January 2023 to June 2024 were selected as the study subjects．All patients received comprehensive treatment during their hospital stay,including thorough debridement,edge treatment,vacuum therapy,infection control and routine nursing care．Prior to discharge,the patients were randomly divided into two groups using a random number table,with 40 patients in each group．Both groups received routine nursing care during their hospital stay,and the control group received continuing nursing care and regular follow-up after discharge．Forty patients in the intervention group received the integrated hospital-community-home rehabilitation nursing model after discharge．Quality of life（QoL）and wound healing rates were assessed using the Short Form 36（SF-36）questionnaire at the time of enrollment and 3 months after nursing．Results The wound healing rate in the intervention group was significantly higher than that in the control group （[32.61±4.26]% vs [11.48±1.04]%）,with a statistical difference（t=19.473,P<0.05）．The numerical rating scale（NRS）scores and frequency of wound pain scores decreased in both groups 3 months after nursing compared to the enrollment period（P<0.05）．Specifically,the VAS score for wound pain in the intervention group 3 months after nursing was（1.82±0.17）,and the frequency of wound pain was（1.28±0.25）,in the control group,these scores were（3.91±0.22）and（2.63±0.37）,respectively,with the intervention group scoring significantly lower than the control group（P<0.05）．Furthermore,the scores for overall health,physical function,role physical,mental health,emotional function,and social function in the intervention group were higher than those in the control group 3 months after nursing（P<0.05）．During the 3-month home recovery period,the incidence of infection in the intervention group was 5.00%,whereas it was 17.50% in the control group,with the intervention group showing a lower incidence of infection（χ²=3.781,P<0.05）．Conclusions This study demonstrates that the hospital-community-home integrated rehabilitation care model intervention can promote wound healing in chronic wound patients,reduce the risk of infection during home care,and significantly improve patients’ quality of life．

Key words: hospital-community-home integrated nursing model, chronic wounds, quality of life, wound healing

黄婕, 李淑霞, 杨荣华. 医院-社区-家庭一体化康复护理模式干预对慢性创面患者生活质量及创面愈合的影响研究[J]. 广州医药, 2025, 56(5): 694-700.

HUANG Jie, LI Shuxia, YANG Ronghua. Impact of hospital-community-home integrated rehabilitation nursing model on the quality of life and wound healing in patients with chronic wounds[J]. Guangzhou Medical Journal, 2025, 56(5): 694-700.

参考文献

[1] 吴斌,李荣.VSD联合银离子敷料治疗慢性创面的疗效观察及护理探讨[J].中国美容医学,2023,32(2):64-67.
[2] 刘彤,郭锦丽.伤口治疗师对慢性创面居家护理管理小程序需求的调查分析[J].护理研究,2022,36(22):4078-4081.
[3] 蒋群花,程惠仙,沈丽,等.医院-社区-家庭护理模式对脊髓损伤患者康复的影响[J].上海护理,2018,18(4):28-31.
[4] 罗晓花,刘娟,陈月梅,等.Ⅱ期及以上压力性损伤患者创面恢复的影响因素分析及护理对策[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2023,29(2):76-79.
[5] GBD 2017 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators.Global,regional,and national incidence,prevalence,and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories,1990-2017:A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017[J].Lancet,2018,392(10159):1789-1858.
[6] JIANG Y,HUANG S,FU X,et al.Epidemiology of chronic cutaneous wounds in China[J].Wound Repair Regen,2011,19(2):181-188.
[7] 徐晓玮,王晴,贾辛婕.乳腺癌术后留置伤口引流管患者居家康复需求的质性研究[J].天津护理,2024,32(1):22-26.
[8] 何燕敏,杨晓伊,嵇会明.延续护理在慢性伤口患者居家护理中的应用价值[J].中西医结合护理(中英文),2024,10(3):94-96.
[9] 万丽,赵晴,陈军,等.疼痛评估量表应用的中国专家共识(2020版)[J].中华疼痛学杂志,2020,16(3):177-187.
[10] 李静如,王蔚,王江玲.1例富血小板血浆治疗外阴Paget’s病术后创面感染的护理体会[J].护士进修杂志,2022,37(2):189-191.
[11] 张弦,王逸扬,徐沁心,等.游离皮瓣亚急诊修复老年患者小腿Gustilo Ⅲ型骨折创面的围手术期护理体会[J].中华显微外科杂志,2023,46(3):356-360.
[12] 树侃燕,衡妍妮,吴昱.基于SWOT分析法的护理干预对门诊烧伤患者创面感染的控制效果探讨[J].中国美容医学,2022,31(7):156-159.
[13] 袁明明,顾媛媛,陈秀平.四肢感染缺损创面负压封闭引流技术的综合护理[J].实用手外科杂志,2022,36(3):412-413.
[14] 冯莉,李润,程霖.医院-社区-家庭一体化康复护理模式对脑卒中患者生存质量的影响[J].成都医学院学报,2023,18(2):249-252.
[15] 谢志勤,杨珍.慢性伤口疼痛管理的发展与展望[J].全科护理,2020,18(36):5059-5063.
[16] 梁爱新,蔡玩珠,陈宝珍,等.综合护理干预对缓解肛周脓肿术后伤口疼痛及伤口换药疼痛的效果观察[J].医药前沿,2021,11(35):128-129.
[17] 刘友丽,王菲,杜爱,等.可视化宣教缓解断指再植患者伤口换药疼痛的效果分析[J].实用骨科杂志,2018,24(7):670-672.
[18] 林若菡. 综合护理干预对糖尿病慢性伤口感染患者护理效果及伤口愈合的影响[J].实用临床护理学电子杂志,2023,8(38):89-91,102.
[19] 朱慧雅,李书慧,李婷.基于聚焦解决模式的护理对门诊慢性伤口患者伤口愈合及生活质量的影响[J].哈尔滨医药,2023,43(5):116-119.
[20] 顾炜,顾玉宇,牟旭红,等.区域医联体网格化护理模式对慢性伤口患者生活质量与照顾行为的影响[J].国际护理学杂志,2023,42(10):1899-1902.
[21] 宋舒娟,周方园,刘建敏.医院-社区-家庭一体化护理模式对肝癌介入治疗患者生活质量的影响[J].中国肿瘤临床与康复,2021,28(5):631-634.