五种检测技术在尘肺合并肺结核诊断中的应用价值

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-8535.2024.01.005

广州医药 ›› 2024, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (1): 30-34.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8535.2024.01.005

五种检测技术在尘肺合并肺结核诊断中的应用价值

苏伟明¹, 姜丹丹¹, 伍定辉¹, 黄智忠²

1 厦门大学附属第一医院肺科（福建厦门 361000）
2 福建省疾病预防控制中心结核病麻风病防治所（福建厦门 361000）

收稿日期:2023-07-24 出版日期:2024-01-20 发布日期:2024-01-24
通讯作者: 伍定辉,E-mail：903952438@qq.com

The application value of five testing techniques in the diagnosis of pneumoconiosis combined with pulmonary tuberculosis

SU Weiming¹, JIANG Dandan¹, WU Dinghui¹, HUANG Zhizhong²

1 Department of Pulmonology,the First Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University,Xiamen 361000,China
2 Institute of Tuberculosis and Leprosy,Fujian Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Xiamen 361000,China

Received:2023-07-24 Online:2024-01-20 Published:2024-01-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨痰涂片找抗酸杆菌、痰利福平耐药实时荧光定量核酸扩增检测技术（Xpert MTB/RIF）、分枝杆菌菌种鉴定、痰抗酸杆菌培养和血γ-干扰素释放检测技术（TB-IGRA）5种检测技术在尘肺合并肺结核临床诊断中的应用价值。方法纳入2016年7月—2021年5月在厦门大学附属第一医院住院治疗的尘肺合并肺结核患者,按照尘肺患者是否合并肺结核,将患者分为尘肺组（156例）和尘肺合并肺结核组（111例）;比较两组患者的性别、年龄、接尘时间等一般资料,以及患者痰涂片、Xpert MTB/RIF、分枝杆菌菌种鉴定、痰培养和TB-IGRA的检测结果,分析尘肺合并肺结核患者5种检测技术阳性检出率的差异及其诊断价值。结果在尘肺合并肺结核组中,TB-IGRA检测方法的阳性检出率最高（81.1%）,高于其他4种检测方法（P<0.01）;两两联合检测,以Xpert MTB/RIF+TB-IGRA组合的检测方式检出率最高（96.4%）,高于其他9种组合（P<0.01）。结论 TB-IGRA检测方法对尘肺合并肺结核患者的阳性检出率较高,联合Xpert MTB/RIF检测后可进一步提高诊断效率,对早期诊断尘肺是否合并结核具有重要的临床诊断价值。

关键词: 尘肺, 肺结核, Xpert MTB/RIF, TB-IGRA, 分枝杆菌菌种鉴定

Abstract: Objective To investigate the value of five testing techniques in the clinical diagnosis of pneumoconiosis combined pulmonary tuberculosis,including sputum smear,Xpert Mycobacterium tuberculosis/rifampicin（Xpert MTB/RIF）,identification of Mycobacterium species,sputum acid-fast bacilli culture and tuberculosis-interferon-gamma release assays（TB-IGRA）．Methods Patients with pneumoconiosis combined with tuberculosis who were hospitalized in the First Hospital of Xiamen University from July 2016 to May 2021 were included in the study．The patients were divided into the pneumoconiosis group（156 cases）and pneumoconiosis combined with tuberculosis group（111 cases）according to whether the pneumoconiosis patients were combined with tuberculosis or not．The general data of the patients in the two groups were compared with respect to gender,age,and dust exposure time,and the results of sputum smears,Xpert MTB/RIF,identification of Mycobacterium species,sputum acid-fast bacilli culture and TB-IGRA were collected to analyze the differences and the diagnostic value in the five testing techniques of the positivity rates for patients who have pneumoconiosis combined with pulmonary tuberculosis．Results In the group with pneumoconiosis combined with tuberculosis,the positive detection rate of TB-IGRA was the highest（81.1%）,which was higher than other 4 testing methods（P<0.01）．Combined testing in pairs suggested that the testing method of Xpert MTB/RIF and TB-IGRA combination was the highest（96.4%）,significantly higher than the other 9 combinations（P<0.01）．Conclusions TB-IGRA has higher positive detection rate for patients with pneumoconiosis combined with tuberculosis,and diagnostic efficiency can be further improved by combining Xpert MTB/RIF assay testing,which is of great clinical diagnostic value for the early diagnosis of pneumoconiosis combined with tuberculosis．

Key words: pneumoconiosis, pulmonary tuberculosis, Xpert MTB/RIF, TB-IGRA, identification of Mycobacterium species

苏伟明, 姜丹丹, 伍定辉, 黄智忠. 五种检测技术在尘肺合并肺结核诊断中的应用价值[J]. 广州医药, 2024, 55(1): 30-34.

SU Weiming, JIANG Dandan, WU Dinghui, HUANG Zhizhong. The application value of five testing techniques in the diagnosis of pneumoconiosis combined with pulmonary tuberculosis[J]. Guangzhou Medical Journal, 2024, 55(1): 30-34.

参考文献

[1] QI X M,LUO Y,SONG M Y,et al.Pneumoconiosis:Current status and future prospects[J].Chin Med J(Engl),2021,134(8):898-907.
[2] SU X,KONG X,YU X,et al.Incidence and influencing factors of occupational pneumoconiosis:A systematic review and meta-analysis[J].BMJ Open,2023,13(3):e065114.
[3] LUO W,LIN Y,LI Z,et al.Comparison of sputum induction and bronchoscopy in diagnosis of sputum smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis:A systemic review and meta-analysis[J].BMC Pulm Med,2020,20(1):146.
[4] WAGNEW F,ALENE K A,KELLY M,et al.The effect of undernutrition on sputum culture conversion and treatment outcomes among people with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis:A systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Int J Infect Dis,2023(127):93-105.
[5] KENAOPE L,FERREIRA H,SEEDAT F,et al.Sputum culture and drug sensitivity testing outcome among X-pert Mycobacterium tuberculosis/rifampicin-positive,rifampicin-resistant sputum:A retrospective study - Not all rifampicin resistance is multi-drug resistant[J].J Glob Antimicrob Resist,2020(21):434-438.
[6] 职业性尘肺病的诊断:GBZ 70-2015[S].2015.
[7] 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会.肺结核诊断标准(WS 288-2017)[J].新发传染病电子杂志,2018,3(1):59-61.
[8] HALL N B,BLACKLEY D J,HALLDIN C N,et al.Current review of pneumoconiosis among US coal miners[J].Curr Environ Health Rep,2019,6(3):137-147.
[9] WANG T,SUN W,WU H,et al.Respiratory traits and coal workers’ pneumoconiosis:Mendelian randomisation and association analysis[J].Occup Environ Med,2021,78(2):137-141.
[10] ALMBERG K S,FRIEDMAN L S,ROSE C S,et al.Progression of coal workers’ pneumoconiosis absent further exposure[J].Occup Environ Med,2020,77(11):748-751.
[11] HU M,WANG Z,HU X,et al.High-resolution computed tomography diagnosis of pneumoconiosis complicated with pulmonary tuberculosis based on cascading deep supervision U-Net[J].Comput Meth prog Bio,2022(226):107151.
[12] SKOWROŃSKI M,HALICKA A,BARINOW-WOJEWÓDZKi A.Pulmonary tuberculosis in a male with silicosis[J].Adv Respir Med,2018,86(3).
[13] DATTA S,SHAH L,GILMAN R H,et al.Comparison of sputum collection methods for tuberculosis diagnosis:A systematic review and pairwise and network meta-analysis[J].Lancet Glob Health,2017,5(8):e760-e771.
[14] 单颖,赵雪梅,王文明,等.Xpert MTB/RIF检测技术在尘肺合并肺结核诊断中的应用价值分析[J].预防医学情报杂志,2020,36(9):1136-1139.
[15] 王华,甄拴平,高涛.结核感染T细胞γ干扰素释放试验(TB-IGRA)在结核病诊断中的应用[J].临床医学研究与实践,2018,3(25):97-98.
[16] STEINGART K R,SCHILLER I,HORNE D J,et al.Xpert®MTB/RIF assay for pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults[J].Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2014,21(1):CD009593.

五种检测技术在尘肺合并肺结核诊断中的应用价值

The application value of five testing techniques in the diagnosis of pneumoconiosis combined with pulmonary tuberculosis

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	梁小朋, 胡锦兴, 彭德虎, 任会丽. 肺部受累的惠普尔病与初治菌阴肺结核患者的临床特征对比分析[J]. 广州医药, 2023, 54(6): 28-33.
[2]	朱海妹, 张佳, 刁燕颜, 陈瑜晖. 两种常用免疫学指标对结核病的辅助诊断价值[J]. 广州医药, 2022, 53(1): 50-53.
[3]	李雨铮, 王丹蕾, 鲁效峰. 102例煤工尘肺患者电子计算机断层扫描的影像学表现[J]. 广州医药, 2022, 53(1): 62-64.
[4]	王乐玲, 吴碧彤, 董海平, 林庆裕, 胡锦兴. 继发性肺结核合并肺部真菌感染的临床特点及危险因素分析[J]. 广州医药, 2021, 52(3): 79-83.
[5]	温雅, 杜焰家, 黄娟, 张伟强. 痰TB-DNA、分枝杆菌核酸、涂片找抗酸杆菌及血T-SPOT.TB试验对肺结核的诊断价值研究[J]. 广州医药, 2021, 52(2): 80-83.
[6]	任会丽, 方伟军, 梁瑞云, 胡锦兴. 以肺间质改变为主的不典型肺结核的CT特征分析[J]. 广州医药, 2020, 51(4): 59-63.
[7]	蔡晓婷, 杜雨华. 2008—2017年广州市海珠区肺结核患者登记情况及特征分析[J]. 广州医药, 2019, 50(2): 15-19.
[8]	黄钻明, 谢汉清, 王开福, 张展庆. 肺结核与肺癌并存的CT影像研究[J]. 广州医药, 2018, 49(5): 86-88.
[9]	郑浈浈, 林枫枫, 董琼雄. 多排螺旋CT低剂量胸部扫描在肺结核复查中的应用[J]. 广州医药, 2017, 48(6): 53-56.
[10]	何英俊. 肺结核发病的危险因素病例对照研究[J]. 广州医药, 2017, 48(5): 89-92.
[11]	郦桂青, 谭守勇, 张玲, 钟静, 何庆秋, 李沈丽. 流动人口肺结核患者健康服务需求及影响因素分析[J]. 广州医药, 2017, 48(4): 82-85.
[12]	徐志强, 赖晓宇, 江桂忠. 不同治疗方案治疗老年糖尿病合并初治涂阳肺结核的疗效及安全性观察[J]. 广州医药, 2016, 47(4): 82-83.
[13]	卫安娜, 杜正新, 庞慧敏. 肺结核合并呼吸衰竭脑钠肽浓度变化的临床意义[J]. 广州医药, 2016, 47(1): 6-8.
[14]	赖晓宇, 刘桂芬, 黄惠安. 莫西沙星治疗糖尿病合并肺结核的临床疗效分析[J]. 广州医药, 2015, 46(5): 22-24.
[15]	江桂忠, 徐志强, 赖晓宇. 180例胰岛素抵抗型糖尿病合并肺结核的临床疗效研究[J]. 广州医药, 2015, 46(3): 68-69.