广州医药 ›› 2025, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (9): 1303-1310.DOI: 10.20223/j.cnki.1000-8535.2025.09.021

• 医院管理 • 上一篇    

药源性双硫仑样反应医疗损害责任纠纷分析

付腾飞, 王红珊   

  1. 华南理工大学附属第二医院(广州市第一人民医院)药学科(广东广州 510180)
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-28 出版日期:2025-09-20 发布日期:2025-10-31
  • 通讯作者: 王红珊,E-mail:Whscc@qq.com

Analysis of medical damage liability dispute with drug-induced disulfiram-like reaction

FU Tengfei, WANG Hongshan   

  1. Department of Pharmacy, the First People’s Hospital of Guangzhou, the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510180, China
  • Received:2025-03-28 Online:2025-09-20 Published:2025-10-31

摘要: 目的 分析药源性双硫仑样反应医疗损害责任纠纷的规律及特点,为规避用药风险、促进合理用药提供参考。方法 以“双硫仑”为关键词,检索中国裁判文书网,时间截至2025年3月25日,将通过筛选的裁判文书基本情况、双硫仑样反应药物关联情况、症状表现、转归、赔偿情况等信息提取录入Excel表,建立评价数据库。结果 共检索得裁判文书81份,纳入裁判文书18例,涉及医疗机构为三级医院3例、二级医院5例、卫生院/卫生室7例、民营医院2例、诊所1例;性别构成中,男15例,女3例;怀疑引起双硫仑样反应的药物有头孢哌酮、头孢呋辛、替硝唑、头孢噻肟、甲硝唑、左氧氟沙星、头孢曲松钠、头孢替安和头孢米诺;患者饮酒和用药间隔多为1~3 d;症状表现有呼吸困难/呼吸骤停、昏迷/意识丧失/休克、面色紫绀/局部发紫/指甲发紫、抽搐/发抖、出汗、不能说话/说话不清楚等;转归结果中,15例结局为死亡,1例为神经症,1例为一级伤残(植物人),1例为二级伤残(缺氧缺血性脑病后遗四肢功能障碍);7例患者死亡案例因未尸检影响了结果鉴定;判决情况中,1例和解,1例未公布三审判决结果,余16例医疗机构承担了10%~70%的医疗赔偿责任,赔偿金额43 092.4~1 616 354元;医方存在的过失主要有未认真采集饮酒史、违反诊疗常规用药、违反合理注意义务、未履行知情告知义务等。结论 药源性双硫仑样反应危害大,误诊率高,发病急骤凶险,基层医疗机构对其鉴别和处置能力亟需提高;应重视饮酒史的采集和记录;合理合规处方抗生素;加强对患者的高度注意义务、知情告知义务等履行;医院药学人员应积极参与安全用药工作,做好用药教育。

关键词: 药源性双硫仑样反应, 医疗损害责任纠纷, 中国裁判文书网

Abstract: Objective To analyze the regularity and characteristics of the medical damage liability dispute with drug-induced disulfiram-like reaction,to avoid the risk of medication and provide reference for clinical rational drug use. Methods China Judgements Online had been searched using the keywords of “disulfiram” from inception to March 25,2025. The evaluation table database was established with the excel table to conduct statistical analysis on the basic information of judgements,drug association,clinical performance,outcome of disease and the compensation. Results A total of 81 cases of judgements documents were retrieved,and 18 cases were enrolled. There were 3 tertiary hospitals, 5 second-class hospitals, 7 health-centers, 2 private hospitals,1 clinic among the medical establishments. Fifteen cases were male and 3 cases were female. The drugs suspected causing disulfiram-like reaction were cefoperazone,cefuroxime,tinidazole,cefotaxime,metronidazole,levofloxacin,ceftriaxone,cefotiam,cefminox. The interval between drinking and medication was usually 1-3 days. The symptoms were as follows:dyspnea/respiratory arrest,coma/loss of consciousness/shock,cyanosis /purple nails,convulsion/trembling,sweatiness,inability to speak/lack of clarity,etc. Fifteen cases ended in death,1 was neurosis,1 was first-degree disability (vegetative state),1 was secondary disability (limb dysfunction after hypoxic encephalopathy). The identification of 7 cases of death was affected by the lack of autopsy. One case was settled and the outcome of the third trial was not announced in another case. The remaining 16 medical institutions took 10%-70% of the medical compensation liability,with the compensation amount ranging from 43 092. 4 yuan to 1 615 354 yuan. The main faults of the medical institutions were undetailed drinking history,irregular medication,breaches of duty of reasonable care,failure to fulfill the obligation of informed notification,etc. Conclusions Drug-induced disulfiram-like reaction has the characteristics of graveness of harm and rapid progress. Primary medical institutions need to improve their identification and disposal capacity urgently. Attention should be paid to collecting and recording of drinking history. Antibiotics should be used in a reasonable and compliant manner. Obligation of high attention to patients,information and other obligations should be fulfilled. Hospital pharmacy staff should ensure drug use safety through participating in drug education actively.

Key words: drug-induced disulfiram-like reaction, medical damage liability dispute, China Judgements Online