婴儿孤独症观察量表中文版的临床应用研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-8535.2024.04.004

广州医药 ›› 2024, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (4): 360-364.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8535.2024.04.004

婴儿孤独症观察量表中文版的临床应用研究

彭琼¹, 凡伟², 黄肖霞², 李秋婵², 胡卓坚², 郭碧华², 温慧玲², 吴文华²

1 清远市妇幼保健院儿童群体保健科（广东清远 511510）
2 清远市妇幼保健院儿童康复科（广东清远 511510）

收稿日期:2023-09-13 出版日期:2024-04-20 发布日期:2024-05-17
通讯作者: 吴文华,E-mail：849607684@qq.com
基金资助:
2022年广东省医学科研基金（A2022119）; 广东省清远市科技计划项目（221025227687333）

Clinical application of the Chinese version of the Autism Observation Scale for Infants

PENG Qiong¹, FAN Wei², HUANG Xiaoxia², LI Qiuchan², HU Zhuojian², GUO Bihua², WEN Huiling², WU Wenhua²

1 Department of Child Group Health Care,Qingyuan Maternal and Child Health Hospital,Qingyuan 511510,China
2 Department of Child Rehabilitation,Qingyuan Maternal and Child Health Hospital,Qingyuan 511510,China

Received:2023-09-13 Online:2024-04-20 Published:2024-05-17

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的检验婴儿孤独症观察量表中文版（AOSI）临床应用的灵敏度与特异度,评价其临床应用效果。方法随机抽取1岁时曾在清远市妇幼保健院行AOSI评估,于2~3岁时诊断为孤独症谱系障碍（ASD）的48例患儿为ASD组,诊断为正常发展的46例幼儿作为对照组。比较两组患儿的18个条目得分和总分,采用受试者操作特征（ROC）曲线计算AOSI的特异度、灵敏度、阳性预测值与阴性预测值,并判断AOSI的最佳诊断（阳性）分界值;分析AOSI评估结果与《精神障碍诊断与统计手册（第5版）》（DSM-5）中ASD诊断标准的一致性。结果两组研究对象性别、年龄比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。ASD组各条目得分和总分均高于对照组,且差异具有统计学意义（P<0.01）。AOSI的曲线下面积（AUC）为1.00（P<0.01）,95%置信区间为（1.00,1.00）。不同阳性分界线的灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及一致性相比较,当约登指数等于1.00时AOSI的最佳诊断（阳性截断值）界线为9分时,其上述值均为1.00。AOSI评估结果与DSM-5中ASD的诊断标准完全相一致（Kappa=1,P<0.01）。结论 AOSI应用于评估1岁的婴儿,当取9分为诊断界值时,具有高度的灵敏度与特异度,能较好地预测该婴儿在2~3岁时是否患ASD;AOSI是婴儿期ASD筛查的重要工具,其评估结果可作为ASD高危儿早期干预的证据和ASD的辅助诊断工具,适合于临床推广应用。

关键词: 婴儿, 婴儿孤独症观察量表, 评估

Abstract: Objective To test the sensitivity and specificity of the Chinese version of the Autism Observation Scale for Infants（AOSI）in clinical application and evaluate its clinical application effect．Methods Forty-eight children with autism spectrum disorder（ASD）diagnosed at the age of 2 to 3 years who had undergone AOSI evaluation in Qingyuan Maternal and Child Health Hospital at the age of 1 year（2021）were randomly selected as the ASD group,and 46 children with normal development were randomly selected as the control group．The scores of 18 items and total scores of the two groups of subjects were compared．The specificity,sensitivity,positive predictive value and negative predictive value of AOSI were calculated using the receiver operating characteristic curve（ROC）,and the best diagnostic（positive）cut-off value of AOSI was confirmed．The consistency of AOSI evaluation results with the ASD diagnostic criteria in DSM-5 were compared．Results There was no statistically significant difference in genders or age between two groups（P>0.05）．The scores of each item and total scores in the ASD group were significantly higher than those in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant（P<0.01）．The area under the curve of AOSI（AUC=1.00,P<0.01）had a 95% confidence interval of（1.00,1.00）．Comparing the sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value,negative predictive value and consistency of different positive boundary points,when the Youden index was equal to 1.00,the optimal diagnostic（positive cut-off value）boundary for AOSI was 9 points,and all of the above values were 1.00． The AOSI evaluation results were completely consistent with the diagnostic criteria for ASD in DSM-5（Kappa=1,P<0.01）．Conclusions AOSI has high sensitivity and specificity when it is used to evaluate the 1-year-old infant．When “9 points” is taken as the diagnostic threshold,it can better predict whether the infant has ASD at the age of 2~3 years．AOSI is an important tool for screening ASD in infancy．Its evaluation results can be used as evidence for early intervention of high-risk infants with ASD and as a assisting tool to diagnosis ASD,which is suitable for clinical application．

Key words: infant, the Autism Observation Scale for Infant, assessment

彭琼, 凡伟, 黄肖霞, 李秋婵, 胡卓坚, 郭碧华, 温慧玲, 吴文华. 婴儿孤独症观察量表中文版的临床应用研究[J]. 广州医药, 2024, 55(4): 360-364.

PENG Qiong, FAN Wei, HUANG Xiaoxia, LI Qiuchan, HU Zhuojian, GUO Bihua, WEN Huiling, WU Wenhua. Clinical application of the Chinese version of the Autism Observation Scale for Infants[J]. Guangzhou Medical Journal, 2024, 55(4): 360-364.

参考文献

[1] STEINMAN G.The putative etiology and prevention of autism[J].Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci,2020(173):1-34.
[2] 毕小彬,范晓壮,米文丽,等.高风险婴儿前瞻性纵向研究与孤独症谱系障碍早期识别[J].心理科学进展,2020,28(3):443-455.
[3] 随广红,孙凌.儿童孤独症谱系障碍治疗的研究进展[J].中国妇幼保健,2020,35(11):2148-2150.
[4] WHITEHOUSE A J O,VARCIN K J,PILLAR S,et al.Effect of preemptive intervention on developmental outcomes among infants showing early signs of autism:A randomized clinical trial of outcomes to diagnosis[J].JAMA Pediatr,2021,175(11):e213298.
[5] 王甘雨,段桂琴,杨艳艳,等.高危孤独症谱系障碍幼儿的诊断与干预效果[J].中国妇幼保健,2021,36(11):2446-2450.
[6] 陈艳,陈卓铭,胡荣亮,等.克氏孤独症行为量表的临床应用[J].广东医学,2007,28(3):375-377.
[7] 肖婷,肖湘,储康康,等.中文版量化的婴幼儿孤独症筛查量表信效度研究[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2022,30(4):381-385.
[8] 吴满红,徐宁,常燕群,等.孤独症诊断观察量表模块1和儿童期孤独症评定量表的临床应用对比[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2022,30(11):1181-1184,1236.
[9] ZWAIGENBAUM L,BRYSON S E,BRIAN J,et al.Assessment of autism symptoms from 6 to 18 months of age using the autism observation scale for infants in a prospective high-risk cohort[J].Child Dev,2021,92(3):1187-1198.
[10] HUDRY K,CHETCUTI L,BOUTRUS M,et al.Performance of the Autism Observation Scale for Infants with community-ascertained infants showing early signs of autism[J].Autism,2021,25(2):490-501.
[11] CAPAL J K,HORN P S,MURRAY D S,et al.Utility of the autism observation scale for infants in early identification of autism in tuberous sclerosis complex[J].Pediatr Neurol,2017(75):80-86.
[12] BRYSON S E,ZWAIGENBAUM L,MCDERMOTT C,et al.The Autism Observation Scale for Infants:Scale development and reliability data[J].J Autism Dev Disord,2008,38(4):731-738.
[13] FRANCHINI M,SMITH I M,SACREY L,et al.Continuity of trajectories of autism symptom severity from infancy to childhood[J].J Child Psychol Psychiatry,2023,64(6):895-906.
[14] 周穗赞,张敬旭,王晓莉.农村3岁以下儿童心理行为发育问题预警征象筛查发育偏异及影响因素[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2020,28(9):967-970.
[15] 贾美香. 提升对我国孤独症谱系障碍儿童发病状况及早期干预的关注[J].中国妇幼健康研究,2023,34(1):1-4.
[16] BEN-SASSON A,HABIB S,TIROSH E.Feasibility and validity of early screening for identifying infants with poor social-communication development in a well-baby clinic system[J].J Pediatr Nurs,2014,29(3):238-247.
[17] 胡俊杰. 结节性硬化症儿童共患孤独症谱系障碍的临床特征[D].汕头:汕头大学,2022.
[18] GAMMER I,BEDFORD R,ELSABBAGH M,et al.Behavioural markers for autism in infancy:Scores on the Autism Observational Scale for Infants in a prospective study of at-risk siblings[J].Infant Behav Dev,2015(38):107-115.

婴儿孤独症观察量表中文版的临床应用研究

Clinical application of the Chinese version of the Autism Observation Scale for Infants

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	董顺雨, 张态. 斑马鱼心血管疾病模型研究进展[J]. 广州医药, 2024, 55(3): 231-235.
[2]	周倩, 吴库生. 2型糖尿病自我管理水平的研究进展[J]. 广州医药, 2023, 54(9): 107-111.
[3]	吴肖锋, 陈丽薇, 张浩. 血清H-FABP、Ang-1在急性大血管闭塞性卒中静脉溶栓桥接支架取栓患者预后评估价值[J]. 广州医药, 2023, 54(8): 40-45.
[4]	陈喻萍, 卢茜, 杨磊, 曾丽娟. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者吞咽障碍评估工具的研究进展[J]. 广州医药, 2023, 54(6): 106-111.
[5]	王富云, 刘桂红. 特殊健康儿童预防接种评估及不良反应处理[J]. 广州医药, 2023, 54(10): 46-51.
[6]	吴文华, 温慧玲, 郭碧华, 黄肖霞, 沈锦红. 家庭睡眠习惯调查在孤独症患儿睡眠评估中的信效度研究[J]. 广州医药, 2022, 53(3): 70-73.
[7]	欧阳明, 苏成威, 李紫薇, 关颖, 李姗姗, 范阳东, 黄逸辉. 基于CAF的我国三级公立医院卓越绩效管理实现策略[J]. 广州医药, 2022, 53(2): 135-138.
[8]	温慧, 曾涛, 邱婷, 曹玉敏, 潘小平. 产后妇女认知功能的现况调查及影响因素分析[J]. 广州医药, 2021, 52(1): 81-86.
[9]	杨诗琪, 王丽, 李岳明, 王楠. SAMe-TT₂R₂评分在非瓣膜性房颤患者抗凝疗效中的评估[J]. 广州医药, 2020, 51(2): 31-35.
[10]	魏颖, 张又祥. 神经元型一氧化氮合酶在先天性肥厚性幽门狭窄犬幽门的表达[J]. 广州医药, 2020, 51(1): 6-9.
[11]	余洁明, 吴春远, 赵宏霞. 小婴儿化脓性脑膜炎临床特征和预测因子分析[J]. 广州医药, 2018, 49(5): 61-66.
[12]	孔凤婷. 社区居民健康需求评估的调查分析[J]. 广州医药, 2016, 47(1): 94-96.
[13]	罗梅娟, 张又祥, 翁志媛, 欧巧群, 肖雪. 新生儿早发型无乳链球菌败血症临床分析[J]. 广州医药, 2015, 46(5): 36-38.
[14]	傅洋, 刘筱姝, 吴秉毅, 杜庆锋. FLT3及C-kit突变在急性髓系白血病的临床意义[J]. 广州医药, 2015, 46(5): 39-41.
[15]	林良友, 刘丰, 蔡敬宙, 钟君立, 李雄斌, 洪伟强, 陈敏军. 灯盏花素联合自血穴位注射疗法治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期[J]. 广州医药, 2015, 46(4): 47-49.