广州医药 ›› 2023, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (2): 38-41.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8535.2023.02.007

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

胸部CT值在胸腔积液鉴别诊断的价值

吕晋1, 张棪1, 莫泽珣2, 孙诚2, 郭伟鸿2, 黄晓梅2, 魏树全2,3, 赵子文2,3, 陈立鹏1,3, 李裕军2,3   

  1. 1 广州市第一人民医院/华南理工大学附属第二医院放射科(广州 510180)
    2 广州市第一人民医院/华南理工大学附属第二医院呼吸与危重症医学科(广州 510180)
    3 广州市第一人民医院胸腔积液和胸膜疾病规范化诊治多学科团队(MDT)(广州 510180)
  • 收稿日期:2022-06-28 出版日期:2023-02-20 发布日期:2023-02-27
  • 通讯作者: 李裕军,E-mail: eyliyujun@scut.edu.cn

Application of the chest CT value in differential diagnosis of pleural effusion

LV Jin1, ZHANG Yan1, MO Zexun2, SUN Cheng2, GUO Weihong2, HUANG Xiaomei2, WEI Shuquan2,3, ZHAO Ziwen2,3, CHEN Lipeng1,3, LI Yujun2,3   

  1. 1 Department of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510180, China
    2 Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510180, China
    3 Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT) for Management of Pleural Effusion and Pleural Diseases, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou 510180, China
  • Received:2022-06-28 Online:2023-02-20 Published:2023-02-27

摘要: 目的 探索胸部CT值在胸腔积液鉴别诊断的价值。方法 81例胸腔积液患者纳入本研究,胸腔积液分为渗出液、漏出液、恶性胸腔积液及良性胸腔积液。建立平均CT值的ROC曲线,计算曲线下面积。结果 81例胸腔积液患者中59例为渗出液,22例为漏出液;恶性胸腔积液33例,良性胸腔积液48例。渗出液组平均CT值(16.68±6.76)Hu高于漏出液组(5.50±3.42)Hu(P<0.000 1)。ROC曲线分析结果显示,胸腔积液平均CT值对区分渗出液和漏出液具有较高的准确性(曲线下面积为0.944 5)。当最佳界值为≥9.99 Hu时,其敏感度为88.14%,特异度为90.91%;恶性胸腔积液组平均CT值(15.38±7.29)Hu与良性胸腔积液组平均CT值(12.45±8.03)Hu没有差异(P=0.098 1)。结论 在胸腔积液的鉴别诊断过程中,胸部CT的CT值在鉴别漏出液及渗出液中有一定的价值,但尚不能用于鉴别良性及恶性胸腔积液。

关键词: 胸腔积液, CT值, 鉴别诊断

Abstract: Objective To explore the value of chest CT value in the differential diagnosis of pleural effusion. Methods A total of 81 patients with pleural effusion were included in this study, including exudate, transudate, malignant pleural effusion and benign pleural effusion.The ROC curve of average CT value was established and the area under the curve was calculated. Results Among 81 patients with pleural effusion, 59 cases were exudative, 22 cases were transudative, 33 cases were malignant pleural effusion and 48 cases were benign pleural effusion.The mean CT value of the exudate group, (16.68±6.76) Hu, was significantly higher than (5.50±3.42) Hu of the transudate group (P<0.000 1).ROC curve analysis showed that the mean CT value of pleural effusion had high accuracy in distinguishing exudate from transudate (area under the curve was 0.9445).When the cut-off value for exudative effusion was over 9.99 Hu, the sensitivity and specificity were 88.14% and 90.91%, respectively.The mean CT value of malignant pleural effusion group, (15.38±7.29) Hu, was not significantly different from (12.45±8.03) Hu of benign pleural effusion group (P=0.098 1). Conclusions In the differential diagnosis of pleural effusion, the chest CT value can be used to identify transudate and exudate, but not benign and malignant pleural effusion.

Key words: pleural effusion, CT value, differential diagnosis