[1] MOUSAVI S H, ZARRABI M, ABROUN S, et al. Umbilical cord blood quality and quantity: collection up to transplantation[J]. Asian J Transfus Sci, 2019, 13(2): 79-89. [2] DIMAS-GONZáLEZ J, NIETO-LINARES A, MILLáN-ROCHA M, et al. Thawing methods do not affectcell viability of CD45+ and CD34+ cells, but long-term cryopreservation of umbilical cord blood units generally decreases cell viability[J]. Transfus Apher Sci,2019, 58(2): 196-200. [3] PASHA R, HOWELLA, TURNERTR, et al. Transient warming affects potency of cryopreserved cord blood units[J]. Cytotherapy, 2020,22(11):690-697. [4] 田亚平. 细胞治疗服务标准(第9版)[J].中国研究型医院,2020,7(5):14-48. [5] YANG H, PIDGORNA A, LOUTFY M R, et al. Effects of interruptions of controlled-rate freezing on the viability of umbilical cord blood stem cells[J]. Transfusion, 2015,55(1):70-78. [6] Statistics Search & Match Service. Total number of donors and cord blood units[DB/OL]. https://wmda.info/about-us/media-centre/. [7] JöRIS M, PAULSON K, FOLEY L, et al. Worldwide survey on key indicators for public cord blood banking technologies: by the World Marrow Donor Association Cord Blood Working Group[J]. Stem Cells Transl Med, 2021, 10(2):222-229. [8] HUSSEIN E, DEFOR T, WAGNER J E, et al. Evaluation of post-thaw CFU-GM: clinical utility and role in quality assessment of umbilical cord blood in patients receiving single unit transplant[J]. Transfusion, 2020, 60(1):144-154. [9] BARKER J N, KEMPENICH J, KURTZBERG J, et al. CD34+ cell content of 126341 cord blood units in the US inventory: implications for transplantation and banking[J]. Blood Adv, 2019, 3(8):1267-1271. [10] 吴洁莹,廖灿,陈劲松,等. 脐血复温后细胞输入剂量对植入的预测作用分析[J].中国实验血液学杂志,2011,19(3):754-758. [11] GOODWIN H S, GRUNZINGER L M, REGAN D M, et al. Long term cryostorage of UC blood units: ability of the integral segment to confirm both identity and hematopoietic potential[J]. Cytotherapy, 2003,5(1):80-86. [12]SOLVES P, PLANELLES D, MIRABET V, et al. Utility of bag segment and cryovial samples for quality control and confirmatory HLA typing in umbilical cord blood banking[J]. Clin Lab Haematol, 2004,26(6):413-418. [13] van HAUTE I, LOOTENS N, de SMET S, et al. Viable CD34+ stem cell content of a cord blood graft: which measurement performed before transplantation is most representative?[J]. Transfusion, 2004,44(4):547-554. [14] RODRíGUEZ L, GARCíA J, QUEROL S. Predictive utility of the attached segment in the quality control of a cord blood graft[J]. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant, 2005, 11(4):247-251. [15] LEE H R, SHIN S, YOON J H, et al. Attached segment has higher CD34+ cells and CFU-GM than the main bag after thawing[J]. Cell Transplant, 2015, 24(2):305-310. [16] FAIVRE L, BOUCHER H, ZERBIB R, et al. Cord blood attached segment: is this a relevant quality control to predict a good hematopoietic stem cell graft?[J]. Bone Marrow Transplant, 2017,52(9):1353-1354. [17] GALINDO C C, VANEGAS LOZANO D M, CAMACHO RODRíGUEZ B, et al. Cord blood attached-segments are not homogeneous in post-thaw CD34+ cell viability and clonogenicity[J]. Cryobiology, 2018(82): 163-164. [18] MORGENSTERN D A, AHSAN G, BROCKLESBY M, et al. Post-thaw viability of cryopreserved peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) does not guarantee functional activity: important implications for quality assurance of stem cell transplant programmes[J]. Br J Haematol, 2016, 174(6):942-951. [19] BRAND A, EICHLER H, SZCZEPIORKOWSKI Z M, et al. Viability does not necessarily reflect the hematopoietic progenitor cell potency of a cord blood unit: results of an interlaboratory exercise[J]. Transfusion, 2008, 48(3): 546-549. |