AngioJet血栓抽吸联合髂静脉支架置入治疗下肢深静脉血栓合并髂静脉压迫的疗效分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-8535.2020.05.028

广州医药 ›› 2020, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (5): 119-122.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8535.2020.05.028

AngioJet血栓抽吸联合髂静脉支架置入治疗下肢深静脉血栓合并髂静脉压迫的疗效分析

陈秋文, 林裕辉, 陈陈准, 陈剑洪

揭阳市人民医院普外一科(揭阳 522000)

收稿日期:2020-04-02 出版日期:2020-09-20 发布日期:2021-11-28
通讯作者: 陈秋文,E-mail:chqw5413@126.com
基金资助:
揭阳市科技计划卫生医疗项目(2018wsyl018)

Analysis of the efficacy of AngioJet thrombus aspiration combined with iliac vein stent implantation in the treatment of lower extremity deep venous thrombosis with iliac vein compression

CHEN Qiuwen, LIN Yuhui, CHEN Chenzhun, CHEN Jianhong

Department of General Surgery, Jieyang People's Hospital, Jieyang 522000, China

Received:2020-04-02 Online:2020-09-20 Published:2021-11-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的分析AngioJet血栓抽吸联合髂静脉支架在下肢深静脉血栓合并髂静脉压迫的临床疗效。方法 2016年1月—2019年6月在揭阳市人民医院普外一科收治的首发髂股DVT并在AngioJet吸栓或联合导管溶栓后置入支架的患者,比较吸栓后直接支架置入和溶栓再分期支架置入的治疗效果。结果本研究共纳入50例接受支架手术的DVT患者,其中治疗组29例,分期置入组21例。治疗组临床症状缓解率和住院时间优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05),且出血风险更低。而置入支架长度和直径无差异,治疗组的3个月、6个月和12个月的通畅率、静脉返流时间和 Villalta评分均无差异(P＞0.05)。结论 AngioJet血栓清除后直接支架置入术是治疗合并髂静脉压迫的下肢深静脉血栓的有效方法,临床改善更快,住院时间显著缩短。

关键词: 深静脉血栓, 髂静脉压迫, AngioJet, 静脉支架

Abstract: Objective To analyze the clinical effect of AngioJet thrombus aspiration combined with iliac vein stent in deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremity with iliac vein compression. Methods From January 2016 to June 2019, patients with first iliofemoral DVT and stent implantation after AngioJet thrombolysis or combined catheter thrombolysis were treated in the first department of general surgery, Jieyang People's Hospital. The therapeutic effects of direct stent implantation and stent implantation after thrombolysis were compared. Results A total of 50 patients with DVT who underwent stent surgery were included in this study, including 29 in the treatment group and 21 in the staging group. The clinical symptom relief rate and length of stay in the treatment group were better than those in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05), and the risk of bleeding was lower. There was no significant difference in stent length and diameter. There were no significant differences in patency rate, venous reflux time, and Villalta score in the treatment group at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months (P>0.05). Conclusion Direct stent placement after AngioJet thrombectomy is an effective method for treating deep venous thrombosis of lower limbs with iliac vein compression. The clinical improvement is faster and the length of hospital stay is significantly shortened.

Key words: Deep venous thrombosis, Iliac vein compression, AngioJet, Venous stent

陈秋文, 林裕辉, 陈陈准, 陈剑洪. AngioJet血栓抽吸联合髂静脉支架置入治疗下肢深静脉血栓合并髂静脉压迫的疗效分析[J]. 广州医药, 2020, 51(5): 119-122.

CHEN Qiuwen, LIN Yuhui, CHEN Chenzhun, CHEN Jianhong. Analysis of the efficacy of AngioJet thrombus aspiration combined with iliac vein stent implantation in the treatment of lower extremity deep venous thrombosis with iliac vein compression[J]. Guangzhou Medical Journal, 2020, 51(5): 119-122.

参考文献

[1] MEISSNER M H. Thrombolytic therapy for acute deep vein thrombosis and the venous registry[J]. Rev Cardiovasc Med, 2019, 3(S2): 53-60.
[2] YUAN X, ZHU Z, YAO J, et al. Epidemiology and risk factors for deep vein thrombosis in patients with hip fractures[J]. Int J Clin Exp Med, 2019, 12(1): 178-185.
[3] POUNCEY A, KHAN T, SAHA P, et al. Classification of factors associated with stenosis, re-occlusion and subsequent re-intervention, following deep venous stenting for acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis[J]. Eur J Vasc Endovascr Surg, 2019, 58(6): e699-e700.
[4] WITTENS C H A, BLACK S A. The future of iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis treatment[J]. J Vascu Surg, 2019, 7(6): 771-772.
[5] 孙万里,温世奇,陈泉,等.重组人尿激酶原经导管溶栓治疗急性髂股深静脉血栓的疗效观察[J].中国普通外科杂志,2019,28(12):1507-1512.
[6] 陈秋文,陈陈准,陈剑洪,等.急性下肢深静脉血栓形成即时溶栓失败的危险因素探究[J].中国血管外科杂志(电子版),2020,3(12):20-23.
[7] HASKAL Z J. Mechanical thrombectomy devices for the treatment of peripheral arterial occlusions[J]. Rev Cardiovasc Med, 2019, 3(S2): 45-52.
[8] 张桂菊,郑业栋,沈小岚,等. 麻子仁丸加味治疗30例小儿胃肠燥热型便秘疗效观察[J]. 中国中西医结合儿科学,2014,6(5):459-461.
[9] 吴龙梅. 生白术治疗脾虚不运型功能性便秘浅析[J]. 中国处方药,2018,16(6):98-99.
[10] 叶爱军. 北京医院生白术治疗便秘处方分析[J]. 北京中医药,2019,38(1):77-78.
[11] 陶贤周. 白术通便秘[J]新中医,1982(1):19.
[12] 朱树宽,范秀英. 白术治疗胸腔积液[J]. 新中医,2006,38(2):72-73.
[13] 陈娟,顾俊菲,汪春飞,等. 组分结构中药与网络药理学:病理机制网络的系统整体调控[J]. 中国中药杂志,2015,40(4):758-764.
[14] 张贵彪,陈启龙,苏式兵. 中药网络药理学研究进展[J]. 中国中医药信息杂志,2013,20(8):103-106.
[15] 蔡甜甜,潘华峰,王奇,等. 中药复方在病证基础上的网络药理学研究[J]. 中华中医药杂志,2016,31(11):4746-4748.
[16] 赵芳卿,翟菲,项荣武,等. 网络药理学研究态势的可视化分析[J]. 中华中医药杂志,2018,33(7):3099-3103.
[17] HOPKINS A L. Network pharmacology:The next paradigm in drug discovery[J]. Nat Chem Biol,2008,4(11):682-690.
[18] 林适,吴潇烁,陈柏行,等. 基于网络药理学探讨骨碎补治疗骨质疏松症的作用机制[J]. 中国药房,2019,30(10):1333-1338.
[19] 黄启和,周福军,徐旭,等. 基于分子对接技术筛选延胡索抗心肌缺血物质基础研究[J]. 中草药,2019,10(50):2355-2361.
[20] 马新称,罗婷婷,易法令,等. 基于网络药理学研究钩藤治疗高血压的作用机制[J]. 中南药学,2019,17(5):671-675.
[21] RU J L. Construction and utilization of Traditional Chinese Medicine systems pharmacology database and analysis platform [D]. Yangling:Northwest A&F University,2015.
[22] MARTUCCI D,MASSEROLI M,PINCIROLI F. Gene ontology application to genomic functional annotation,statistical analysis and knowledge mining[J]. Stud Health Technol Inform,2004(102):108-131.
[23] 杨娥,钟艳梅,冯毅凡. 白术化学成分和药理作用的研究进展[J]. 广东药学院学报,2012,28(2):218-221.
[24] PRADO M A,REIS R A,PRADO VF,et al. Regulation of acetylcholine synthesis and storage[J]. Neurochem Int,2002,(41):291-299.
[25] 张兆林,羊燕群,刘敏,等. 健胃合剂对功能性消化不良的乙酰胆碱相关治疗机理研究[J]. 江西中医药大学学报,2017,29(2):77-79.
[26] 徐昕. 人类胃肠道间质瘤中瞬时受体电位通道和胆碱能毒蕈碱受体的表达研究[D]. 天津:天津医科大学,2011:5.
[27] 李琼,刘同慎,刘孟安. 胃肠舒对胃肠功能障碍大鼠胃肠道ACHE及NO的影响[J]. 中华中医药杂志,2010,25(8):1307-1310.
[28] 刘海华,郑保平,林唐唐,等. 茶油清润合剂治疗小鼠便秘疗效观察及作用机制研究[J]. 中国中医药现代远程教育,2019,17(9):101-104.

AngioJet血栓抽吸联合髂静脉支架置入治疗下肢深静脉血栓合并髂静脉压迫的疗效分析

Analysis of the efficacy of AngioJet thrombus aspiration combined with iliac vein stent implantation in the treatment of lower extremity deep venous thrombosis with iliac vein compression

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价