临床全程导师制结合OSCE考试法对本科实习护生评判性思维的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-8535.2018.06.014

广州医药 ›› 2018, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (6): 62-66.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8535.2018.06.014

临床全程导师制结合OSCE考试法对本科实习护生评判性思维的影响

黄琛厦, 张积慧, 蔡丹嬿, 王秋喆

广州市第一人民医院护理部（广州 510180）

收稿日期:2018-04-19 出版日期:2018-11-20 发布日期:2021-11-30

The application and influence of the whole course mentor system combined with OSCE on the critical thinking ability of undergraduate clinical student nurses

HUANG Chenxia, ZHANG Jihui, CAI Danyan, WANG Qiuzhe

Nursing Department, Guangzhou First People's Hospital , Guangzhou, 510180 China

Received:2018-04-19 Online:2018-11-20 Published:2021-11-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨临床全程导师制结合OSCE考试法对实习护生评判性思维的影响。方法将176名在我院实习的本科实习护生随机分为两组,每组88人。对照组采用传统的临床带教和考核方式进行带教,实验组采用临床全程导师制结合OSCE考试法进行带教。记录两组理论考试成绩、实践技能成绩及护理病历成绩,比较两组实习护生教学前后评判性思维能力,比较两组实习护生干预后对临床带教模式的整体评价。结果实验组理论考试成绩、实践技能成绩、护理病历成绩得分均高于对照组（P<0.05）。开展教学后两组评判性思维能力量表（CTDI-CV）各维度评分及总分均升高,实验组各维度评分及总分均高于对照组（P<0.05）。开展教学后实验组对临床带教模式的整体评价均高于对照组（P<0.05）。结论临床全程导师制结合OSCE考试法,有助于提高本科实习护生的评判性思维能力。

关键词: 临床全程导师制, OSCE考试法, 本科实习护生, 评判性思维

Abstract: Objective To explore the application and influence of the whole course mentor system combined with OSCE on the critical thinking ability of undergraduate clinical student nurses. Methods 176 undergraduate clinical student nurses were divided to control group and experimental group,88 for a group respectively. Control group used traditional clinical teaching method while the experimental group used whole course mentor system combined with OSCE. The theory and practice assessment scores ,medical record writing scores and critical thinking scores of clinical student nurses before and after the implementation of the two teaching modes were compared. Results The theory and practice assessment scores and medical record writing scores of the students in the experimental group were better than those of students in the control group（P<0.05）. The score of CTDI-CV was increased in both two groups after intervention. The score of all dimensions in CTDI-CV was better improved in the experimental group than that of controls （P<0.05）. And the evaluation of teaching mode of the experimental group was better than the control group（P<0.05）. Conclusion The teaching method of the whole course mentor system combined with OSCE is helpful to improve undergraduate clinical student nurses'ability of critical thinking.

Key words: The whole course mentor system, OSCE, Undergraduate clinical student nurses, Critical thinking ability

黄琛厦, 张积慧, 蔡丹嬿, 王秋喆. 临床全程导师制结合OSCE考试法对本科实习护生评判性思维的影响[J]. 广州医药, 2018, 49(6): 62-66.

HUANG Chenxia, ZHANG Jihui, CAI Danyan, WANG Qiuzhe. The application and influence of the whole course mentor system combined with OSCE on the critical thinking ability of undergraduate clinical student nurses[J]. Guangzhou Medical Journal, 2018, 49(6): 62-66.

参考文献

[1] 柳丰萍,王红红,邹叶青.护理案例论坛对培养护生评判性思维能力的作用[J]. 中华护理杂志,2008,43(1):19-22.
[2] CISE J S,WILSON C S,THIE M J.A qualitative tool for critical thinking skill development[J].Nurse Educ,2004,29(4):147-151.
[3] 董文菊,汪淼芹. OSCE 在全科护士培训考核体系中的应用[J]. 护理学杂志,2013,28(13): 30-32.
[4] 陈松兰,丁殿坤,孙铮,等.培养护生批判性思维的教学方法[J] . 护士进修杂志,2003,18(1): 33.
[5] 童淑萍,李惠玲.本科护生“全程导师制”临床带教的实践与效果[J]. 护士进修杂志,2007,22(2):143-144.
[6] 沈海波,顾正勤,康健,等.客观结构化临床考试考站设置的改进[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志,2015,14(4): 364-367.
[7] 易红. 思维导图案例教学法对护生评判性思维能力的影响[J]. 全科护理,2015,13(4): 291-292.
[8] 李娟,吕伟波,胡琛,等.基于标准化患者的客观结构化临床考试在护理本科毕业生临床技能考评中的应用[J]. 解放军护理杂志,2010,27(22): 1681-1683.
[9] 彭美慈,汪国成,陈基乐,等.批判性思维能力测量表的信效度测试研究[J].中华护理杂志,2004,39(9): 644-647.
[10] 李小妹,朱京慈.护理学导论[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:194.
[11] 严海燕,尚琴芬.护士评判性思维态度倾向性与其创新行为的关系[J].中国实用护理杂志,2016,32(14):1103-1106.
[12] 朋玲龙,季学磊,朱峰岭,等.综合医院住院医师规范化培训应用“导师制”培训模式初探[J]. 现代医院,2017,17(11):1611-1612,1615.
[13] 甘蔚明,黄丽贞,邓妙玲,等.医护合作客观结构化临床考试培训对手术室低年资护士应急能力的影响[J]. 广州医药,2017,48(05):54-56,68.
[14] 叶丽花,陈一莉.模拟标准化病人教学法对护生临床沟通能力的影响[J].护理学报,2010,17(13):14-15.

临床全程导师制结合OSCE考试法对本科实习护生评判性思维的影响

The application and influence of the whole course mentor system combined with OSCE on the critical thinking ability of undergraduate clinical student nurses

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价