广州医药 ›› 2015, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4): 47-49.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8535.2015.04.015

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

灯盏花素联合自血穴位注射疗法治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期

林良友, 刘丰, 蔡敬宙, 钟君立, 李雄斌, 洪伟强, 陈敏军   

  1. 广州医科大学附属广州市第一人民医院(广州 510180)
  • 收稿日期:2015-02-16 发布日期:2021-11-30
  • 通讯作者: 林良友,E-mail:71014508@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    广州市医药卫生科技项目(20142A010001)

Treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with Breviscapine combined with self-blood acupoint injection therapy

Lin Liangyou, Liu Feng, Cai Jingzhou, et al   

  1. Guangzhou First People's Hospital affiliated to Guangzhou Medical University,Guangzhou 510180,China
  • Received:2015-02-16 Published:2021-11-30

摘要: 目的 评估灯盏花素联合自血穴位注射疗法治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期(AECOPD)的临床疗效。方法 对照组使用常规治疗方法,治疗组加用灯盏花素联合自血穴位注射疗法。所有入组患者在入院和出院当天进行圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)评分和COPD评估测试(CAT)评分,使用统计软件比较两组的SGRQ总评分、CAT评分和住院天数。结果 SGRQ总评分、CAT评分和住院天数有正相关关系;和对照组相比较,治疗组SGRQ总评分在治疗前后没有差异, CAT评分在治疗前后有差异,治疗组的住院天数减少。结论 SGRQ总评分、CAT评分能够反映AECOPD病情,CAT评分更加适合评估AECOPD短期病情变化,灯盏花素联合自血穴位注射疗法治疗AECOPD具有临床疗效。

关键词: 慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期, 灯盏花素, 自血穴位注射疗法, 圣乔治呼吸问卷, COPD评估测试

Abstract: Objective It was evaluated the clinical effect of the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) with Breviscapine combined with self-blood acupoint injection therapy. Methods Routine treatment methods were used in the controlled group. Breviscapine and the self-blood acupoint injection therapy were added into the treatment group. St George's respiratory questionnaire (SGRQ) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test (CAT) were done in all enrolled patients. And the total score of SGRQ, the score of CAT and the length of stay in hospital were assessed. Results There were positive relationships between the total score of SGRQ, the score of CAT and the length of stay in hospital.compared with the controlled group, before and after the treatment, significant difference was not observed with the overall score of SGRQ in the treatment group, but was observed with the score of CAT in the treatment group, and stay time in hospital in the treatment group was declined obviously. Conclusion The total score of SGRQ and the score of CAT could reflect the conditions of AECOPD, and the latter was more suitable for the evaluation of the condition change in short period. The clinical effects were obvious in the treatment of AECOPD with Breviscapine combined with self-blood acupoint injection therapy.

Key words: Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, St George's respiratory questionnaire, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test, Breviscapine, Self-blood acupoint injection therapy