广州医药 ›› 2019, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (3): 77-79.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8535.2019.03.020

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

影响初次机采血小板献血者再次捐献的相关因素分析

欧代校, 欧阳剑, 戴琳, 刘辉忠, 钟慧斌, 周立桥   

  1. 广州血液中心机采成分部(广州 510095)
  • 收稿日期:2019-02-26 出版日期:2019-05-20 发布日期:2021-12-17

Relevant factors affecting the re-donation after the first apheresis platelet donation

OU Daixiao, OUYANG Jian, DAI Lin, LIU Huizhong, ZHONG Huibin, ZHOU Liqiao   

  1. Apheresis Platelet Collection Department of Guangzhou Blood Center,Guangzhou 510095,China
  • Received:2019-02-26 Online:2019-05-20 Published:2021-12-17

摘要: 目的 探讨影响初次机采血小板献血者再次捐献的相关因素,为制定机采献血者保留策略提供依据。方法 选择2016年1月1日—2016年12月31日在广州血液中心首次成功捐献机采血小板的13 899例献血者为研究对象,分析每个献血者献血时性别、年龄、文化程度、是否发生献血不良反应与下一年度是否再次捐献机采血小板的相关性。结果 男性献血者再次捐献率(10.68%)高于女性献血者再次捐献率(8.94%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);献血者年龄18~25岁组再次捐献率最高为12.86%,46~60岁组再次捐献率最低为6.46%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001);献血者文化程度高中或职中组再次捐献率最高为11.23%,本科或以上组再次捐献率最低为8.94%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001);未发生不良反应献血者再次捐献率(10.37%)高于发生不良反应献血者再次捐献率(5.56%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论 男性、年龄较小、文化程度较低和未发生献血不良反应的献血者更愿意返回再次捐献机采血小板,对这部分献血者采取针对性保留措施,有利于建立起一支固定捐献机采血小板的献血者队伍。

关键词: 机采血小板, 再次捐献, 相关因素

Abstract: Objective To explore the related factors affecting the re-donation of the first apheresis platelet donors, and to provide a basis for the retention strategy. Methods A total of 13 899 blood donors who successfully donated apheresis platelets for the first time in Guangzhou Blood Center from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016 were selected as subjects. The correlation among gender, age, education level, adverse reactions of blood donation and whether platelet collection was re-donated in the next year was analyzed. Results Re-donation rate of male blood donors (10.68%) was higher than that of female blood donors (8.94%). The difference was statistically significant (P<0.01). Re-donation rate of blood donors aged 18~25 was the highest 12.86%, and that of 46~60 was the lowest 6.46%. The difference was significant (P<0.001). Re-donation rate of high school or vocational college blood donors was the highest 11.23%. The lowest re-donation rate was 8.94% in the undergraduate group or above, and the difference was statistically significant (P< 0.001). The re-donation rate of donors without adverse reactions (10.37%) was higher than that of donors with adverse reactions (5.56%). The difference was statistically significant (P<0.01). Conclusion Male, younger, less educated and no adverse reactions to blood donation are more willing to return to donate platelet again. Targeting these donors for reserve measure will conducive to the establishment of a fixed platelet donor team.

Key words: Apheresis platelet, Re-donation, Relevant factors