广州医药 ›› 2025, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (6): 798-803.DOI: 10.20223/j.cnki.1000-8535.2025.06.011

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

钝性分离扩皮法与常规扩皮法在乳腺癌术后患者PICC置管中的应用效果

刘容晨1, 赵萌萌2, 安迪2, 王宁3, 闫征4   

  1. 1 天津肿瘤医院空港医院超声诊疗科 (天津 300000);
    2 天津肿瘤医院空港医院放疗物理科 (天津 300000);
    3 天津肿瘤医院空港医院肝胆科(天津 300000);
    4 天津肿瘤医院空港医院门诊(天津 300000)
  • 收稿日期:2024-07-29 发布日期:2025-07-23

Application effect of blunt separating skin expansion and conventional skin expansion in PICC catheterization for patients with breast cancer after operation

LIU Rongchen1, ZHAO Mengmeng2, AN Di2, WANG Ning3, YAN Zheng4   

  1. 1 Department of Ultrasound Treatment,Tianjin Cancer Hospital,Airport Hospital,Tianjin 30000,China;
    2 Department of Radiotherapy Physics,Tianjin Cancer Hospital,Airport Hospital,Tianjin 30000,China;
    3 Department of Hepatobiliary,Tianjin Cancer Hospital,Airport Hospital,Tianjin 30000,China;
    4 Outpatient Service,Tianjin Cancer Hospital,Airport Hospital,Tianjin 30000,China
  • Received:2024-07-29 Published:2025-07-23

摘要: 目的 对比分析钝性分离扩皮法与常规扩皮法对乳腺癌术后患者经外周静脉置入中心静脉导管(PICC)置管应用效果。方法 选取2022年4月—2024年4月在天津肿瘤医院空港医院接受治疗的120例乳腺癌术后PICC置管患者,依据随机数字表法进行分组处理。对照组60例给予常规扩皮法,观察组60例给予钝性分离扩皮法,对比两组患者扩皮结果。结果 观察组患者满意度为96.67%,对照组患者满意度为86.67%(χ2=3.927,P=0.048);观察组患者的穿刺点血液浸湿面积分别为穿刺后即刻(0.87±0.14)cm2、1 d后(4.89±0.94)cm2以及3 d后(0.21±0.05)cm2,均低于对照组的(2.74±0.63)(9.89±2.04)(0.44±0.12)cm2,对比差异有统计学意义(t=22.444、17.243、13.704,P<0.05);观察组患者一次性送鞘成功率为98.33%,对照组患者一次性送鞘成功率为88.33%,观察组高于对照组(χ2=4.821,P=0.028);扩皮前两组患者的VAS评分无差异(P>0.05),扩皮后两组患者的VAS评分均降低,且观察组(1.75±0.54)分低于对照组(3.89±1.22)分,对比差异有统计学意义(t=12.425,P<0.001);观察组患者不良事件发生率为5.00%,对照组患者不良事件发生率为16.67%,观察组患者不良事件发生率低于对照组(χ2=4.227,P<0.05)。结论 钝性分离扩皮法能够降低穿刺点血液浸湿面积及不良事件发生率,提高一次性送鞘成功率,减轻患者疼痛感,提高患者满意度。

关键词: 钝性分离扩皮法, 乳腺癌术后, PICC置管, 不良事件

Abstract: Objective To analyze the effect of blunt separating skin expansion and conventional skin expansion in PICC catheterization of patients after breast cancer surgery. Methods From April 2022 to April 2024,120 patients with postoperative PICC catheterization for breast cancer were selected and grouped according to the random number table method.Sixty patients in the control group received conventional skin expansion,and 60 patients in the observation group received blunt separation skin expansion,which the results of the two groups were compared.Results The patient satisfaction was 96.67% in the observation group,86.67% in the control group(χ2=3.927,P=0.048,P<0.05).In the observation group,the blood immersion area after catheterization,after 1 d and 3 d were(0.87±0.14),(4.89±0.94),(0.21±0.05)cm2,lower than those of the control group [(2.74±0.63)(9.89±2.04)(0.44±0.12)cm2],the comparative difference was statistically significant(t=22.444,17.243,13.704,P<0.05).The success rate of disposable sheath delivery in the observation group was 98.33%,which was higher than 88.33% in the control group(χ2=4.821,P=0.028<0.05).There was no difference in VAS scores between the two groups before the intervention(P>0.05),VAS scores decreased in both groups after the intervention,the score of the observation group(1.75±0.54)was lower than that of the control group(3.89±1.22),the difference was statistically significant(t=12.425,P<0.001).The incidence of adverse events in the observation group was 5.00%,and in the control group was 16.67%,which difference was significant(χ2=4.227,P<0.05).Conclusions Blunt separating skin expansion can reduce the area of blood immersion and the incidence of adverse events,improve the success rate of disposable sheath delivery,reduce patient pain,improve patient satisfaction,and have significant clinical application value.

Key words: blunt separating and skin expansion, postoperative breast cancer, PICC catheterization, adverse event