广州医药 ›› 2025, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (12): 1630-1637.DOI: 10.20223/j.cnki.1000-8535.2025.12.003

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

脓毒性休克患者TRAF6、ChE和APACHEⅡ评分与预后的关联及预测价值

梅彦霞1, 江竹君1, 邵俊2, 郭凌翔2   

  1. 1 南京同仁医院急诊科(江苏南京 211102)
    2 苏北人民医院心脏大血管病中心(江苏扬州 225001)
  • 收稿日期:2025-02-14 出版日期:2025-12-20 发布日期:2026-01-20
  • 通讯作者: 郭凌翔,E-mail:67255379@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省卫生健康委科研项目(Z2020055)

Correlation of TRAF6,ChE and APACHE II scores with prognosis and predictive value in patients with septic shock

MEI Yanxia1, JIANG Zhujun1, SHAO Jun2, GUO Lingxiang2   

  1. 1 Department of Emergency,Nanjing Tongren Hospital,Nanjing 211102,China
    2 Heart Large Vascular Disease Center,Subei People's Hospital,Yangzhou 225001,China
  • Received:2025-02-14 Online:2025-12-20 Published:2026-01-20

摘要: 目的 探讨脓毒性休克患者肿瘤坏死因子相关受体6 (TRAF6)、胆碱酯酶(ChE)及急性生理学和慢性健康状况评价Ⅱ(APACHE Ⅱ)对预后不良的预测价值。方法 回顾分析2023年2月—2024年3月于某院ICU病区收治的226例脓毒性休克患者的临床资料,基于患者预后情况分为预后良好组(n=151)以及预后不良组(n=75)。回顾226例脓毒性休克患者入院时及治疗后的TRAF6、ChE表达变化,并记录患者APACHEⅡ评分和序贯器官功能衰竭评估(SOFA)评分动态变化;比较并分析两组患者详尽的临床资料,探讨TRAF6、ChE联合APACHE Ⅱ评分之间的关联性以及上述指标对脓毒性休克患者预后情况的临床评估价值。采用Logistic回归来分析对脓毒性休克患者生存状况产生影响的潜在因素。结果 多因素Logistic回归分析,年龄、APACHE Ⅱ评分、SOFA评分、机械通气时间、TRAF6与ChE表达水平均是影响患者预后的独立危险因素(P<0.05);受试者操作特征曲线分析显示,年龄、APACHE Ⅱ评分、机械通气时间、SOFA评分、TRAF6、ChE表达水平联合预测脓毒性休克患者预后不良的曲线下面积为0.925,高于单独检测的0.689、0.783、0.794、0.781、0.708、0.827。结论 临床需要及时识别高龄、长时间机械通气时间、高APACHE Ⅱ与SOFA评分、高TRAF6和ChE表达水平的高风险患者,TRAF6、ChE表达水平、SOFA评分、APACHE Ⅱ评分可作为评估脓毒性休克患者预后情况的临床指标,联合应用能进一步提升临床价值。

关键词: 脓毒性休克, TRAF6, ChE, APACHE Ⅱ评分

Abstract: Objective To explore the predictive value of tumor necrosis factor receptor associated factor 6(TRAF6),cholinesterase(ChE)and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scove(APACHE II)for adverse prognosis in patients with septic shock.Methods The clinical data of 226 patients with septic shock admitted to the Intensive Care Unit(ICU) of a hospital from February 2023 to March 2024 were retrospectively analyzed,and the patients were divided into a good prognosis group(n=151)and an adverse prognosis group(n=75)based on their prognosis.The expression of TRAF6 and ChE in 226 patients with septic shock was reviewed at admission and after treatment,while the dynamic changes of APACHE II score and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment(SOFA)score were recorded.Detailed clinical data of the two groups were compared and analyzed to explore the correlation between TRAF6,ChE,APACHE II scores and the clinical evaluation value of the above indexes in the prognosis of patients with septic shock.Logistic regression was used to analyze the potential factors affecting the survival of septic shock patients.Results Multiple Logistic regression analysis revealed that age,APACHE II score,SOFA score,mechanical ventilation time,TRAF6 and ChE expression levels were independent risk factors for prognosis(P<0.05).Receiver Operating Characteristic(ROC)curve analysis showed that the area under curve(AUC)was 0.925,which was higher than single index prediction(0.689,0.783,0.794,0.781,0.708 and 0.827).Conclusions High-risk patients with advanced age,prolonged mechanical ventilation,high APACHE II and SOFA scores,and high TRAF6 and ChE expression levels need to be identified in time.TRAF6,ChE expression levels,SOFA scores,and APACHE II scores can be used as clinical indicators to evaluate the prognosis of septic shock patients.The combined application of those four indicators can further improve the clinical value.

Key words: septic shock, TRAF6, ChE, APACHE II score