广州医药 ›› 2025, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (7): 963-967.DOI: 10.20223/j.cnki.1000-8535.2025.07.016

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

LP-PRP对比LR-PRP联合ESWT治疗慢性非止点跟腱腱病的对比研究

杨国平1, 毕声荣1, 周建国1, 钱锐1, 刘振逾1, 巫路炜2, 胡伟全1, 刘世伟1   

  1. 1 赣州市人民医院关节外科(江西赣州 341000)
    2 赣州市人民医院创伤急救中心(江西赣州 341000)
  • 收稿日期:2024-07-15 出版日期:2025-07-20 发布日期:2025-08-28
  • 基金资助:
    江西省卫生健康委科技计划(202311832)

Comparative study of LP-PRP and LR-PRP combined with ESWT in the treatment of chronic non-insertional Achilles tendinopathy

YANG Guoping1, BI Shengrong1, ZHOU Jianguo1, QIAN Rui1, LIU Zhenyu1, WU Luwei2, HU Weiquan1, LIU Shiwei1   

  1. 1 Department of Joint Surgery,Ganzhou People's Hospital,Ganzhou 341000,China
    2 Ganzhou People's Hospital Trauma Emergency Center,Ganzhou 341000,China
  • Received:2024-07-15 Online:2025-07-20 Published:2025-08-28

摘要: 目的 对比乏白细胞富血小板血浆(LP-PRP)与富白细胞富血小板血浆(LR-PRP)联合体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)治疗慢性非止点跟腱腱病(NIAT)的临床价值。方法 选取2021年12月—2023年12月赣州市人民医院收治的80例慢性NIAT患者,以随机数表法分为两组,即对照组和观察组各40例,观察组予LP-PRP联合ESWT治疗,对照组予LR-PRP联合ESWT治疗;于治疗前、第一次治疗后1个月、3个月比较两组疼痛度[视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分]、跟腱病变程度[维多利亚体育研究所跟腱评估问卷(VISA-A)]、跟腱功能(Arner-Lindholm跟腱功能评分),并比较两组并发症的发生率。结果 两组在治疗后1个月、3个月的VAS评分下降,VISA-A评分升高,且观察组治疗后3个月的VAS评分(1.05±0.31)分低于对照组的(1.82±0.45)分,VISA-A评分(83.35±5.58)分高于对照组的(76.28±5.35)分(F组间与时点交互=338.478、106.663,均P<0.05);治疗后3个月,观察组跟腱功能(优、良、差各有24、13、3例)优于对照组(优、良、差各有14、16、10例),差异有统计学意义(Z=2.529,P=0.012)。两组治疗后1个月时VAS评分、VISA-A评分及跟腱功能比较差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论 与LR-PRP比较,LP-PRP联合ESWT治疗慢性NIAT更有利于减轻患者跟腱疼痛度及病变程度,改善患者跟腱功能。

关键词: 慢性非止点跟腱腱病, 体外冲击波疗法, 富血小板血浆, 跟腱功能

Abstract: Objective To compare the clinical value of leukocyte-poor platelet rich plasma(LP-PRP)and leukocyte-rich platelet rich plasma(LR-PRP)combined with extracorporeal shock wave therapy(ESWT)in the treatment of chronic non -insertional Achilles tendinopathy(NIAT).Methods Eighty patients with chronic NIAT admitted to Ganzhou People's Hospital from December 2021 to December 2023 were randomly divided into two groups using a random number table method:a control group and an observation group,with 40 patients in each group.The observation group received LP-PRP combined with ESWT treatment,while the control group received LR-PRP combined with ESWT treatment.The pain level(Visual Analog Scale[VAS]score),degree of Achilles tendon lesion(Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment-Achilles tendinopathy questionnaire[VISA-A]),and Achilles tendon function(Arner Lindholm Achilles tendon function score)between the two groups were compared before treatment,one month after the first treatment,and three months after treatment,as well as the incidence of complications between the two groups.Results The VAS scores of both groups decreased and the VISA-A scores increased one and three months after treatment.The VAS score of the observation group(1.05±0.31)was lower than that of the control group(1.82±0.45)three months after treatment,while the VISA-A score of the observation group(83.35±5.58)was higher than that of the control group(76.28±5.35)(interaction between group and time point F=338.478,106.663,both P<0.05).After three months of treatment,the Achilles tendon function of the observation group(24 cases of excellent,13 cases of good,and three cases of poor)was better than that of the control group(14 cases of excellent,16 cases of good,and 10 cases of poor),and the difference was statistically significant(Z=2.529,P=0.012).There was no statistically significant difference in VAS score,VISA-A score,and Achilles tendon function between the two groups one month after treatment(all P>0.05).Conclusions Compared with LR-PRP,LP-PRP combined with ESWT was more beneficial in reducing the degree of Achilles tendon pain and lesions in patients with chronic NIAT,and improving Achilles tendon function.

Key words: chronic non-insertional achilles tendinopathy, extracorporeal shock wave therapy, platelet rich plasma, Achilles tendon function