对比分析献血后血肿不同治疗方法的临床治疗效果

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-8535.2019.02.010

广州医药 ›› 2019, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (2): 41-43.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8535.2019.02.010

对比分析献血后血肿不同治疗方法的临床治疗效果

黄晓斌^1,2, 苏玮^1,2, 戚艳萍^1,2, 何博^1,2, 梁雪开^1,2, 张婷^1,2

1 广州血液中心 (广州510095)
2 广州市医学重点实验室(血液安全重点实验室)(广州 510095)

收稿日期:2018-11-06 出版日期:2019-03-20 发布日期:2021-12-17
基金资助:
1.广州市医学重点学科建设项目(血液安全重点实验室)
2.广州市卫生计生科技一般引导项目(20181A010048)

Contrastive analysis of clinic treatment effects on haematoma after blood donation

HUANG Xiaobin^1,2, SU Wei^1,2, QI Yanping^1,2, HE Bo^1,2, LIANG Xuekai^1,2, ZHANG Ting^1,2

1 Guangzhou Blood Center,Guangzhou 510095,China
2 The Key Medical Laboratory of Guangzhou,Key Laboratory of Blood Safety Research, Guangzhou 510095, China.

Received:2018-11-06 Online:2019-03-20 Published:2021-12-17

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的分析献血者献血后血肿(瘀斑)应用不同治疗方法的效果。方法随机选取147例在广州血液中心献血后出现血肿(瘀斑)的献血者,根据其采用处理方式的差异分为甲组(n=66)、乙组(n=48)、丙组(n=33),为甲组献血者实施冷热敷法,为乙组献血者实施马铃薯片贴敷法,为丙组献血者实施喜辽妥(多磺酸粘多糖)软膏外敷法。结果乙组献血者临床总有效率高于甲组献血者,差异有统计学意义(χ²=4.63,P＜0.05),丙组献血者临床总有效率高于甲组献血者,差异有统计学意义(χ²=13.99,P＜0.05),丙组献血者临床总有效率高于乙组献血者,2组差异有统计学意义(χ²=3.99,P＜0.05)。结论献血者献血后血肿应用喜疗妥软膏外敷法疗效确切,可使其身心健康得到改善。

关键词: 献血后血肿, 临床效果, 喜辽妥

Abstract: Objective To analyze the effects of different treatment methods on blood donors with haematoma(or bruise) after blood donation. Methods 147 blood donors with haematoma(or bruise) after blood donation in our blood station were randomly selected. According to the difference of treatment methods, they were divided into group A (n=66), group B (n=48) and group C (n=33), for the group A of blood donors to carry out cold and hot compress method, for the group B blood donors to implement the potato slice application method, for the group C blood donors to implement the hi-treatment ointment external application method. Results The total effective rate of group B blood donors was higher than that of group A blood donors. The difference was statistically significant (χ²=4.63,P＜0.05). The total clinical effective rate of group C blood donors was higher than that of group A blood donors. There is statistical significance (χ²=13.99,P＜0.05). The total effective rate of donors in group C was higher than that in group B. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (χ²=3.99,P＜0.05). Conclusion The effect of external application of Hirudoid(Mucopolysaccharide Polysulfate Cream) on blood donors after blood donation is effective, which may improve their physical and mental health.

Key words: Haematoma after blood donation, Clinical effect, Hirudoid

黄晓斌, 苏玮, 戚艳萍, 何博, 梁雪开, 张婷. 对比分析献血后血肿不同治疗方法的临床治疗效果[J]. 广州医药, 2019, 50(2): 41-43.

HUANG Xiaobin, SU Wei, QI Yanping, HE Bo, LIANG Xuekai, ZHANG Ting. Contrastive analysis of clinic treatment effects on haematoma after blood donation[J]. Guangzhou Medical Journal, 2019, 50(2): 41-43.

[1]	伍思俊, 黎日照. 口腔综合修复技术在牙隐裂患者中的应用分析[J]. 广州医药, 2021, 52(5): 73-75.
[2]	陈翠萍, 刘洁珍, 田荔珍, 李佩君. 康复路径在髋关节置换术后临床护理工作中的应用及效果分析[J]. 广州医药, 2016, 47(5): 45-47.
[3]	蔡青红, 何旭霞. 妈富隆治疗围绝经期功血的临床效果观察[J]. 广州医药, 2015, 46(2): 81-83.

对比分析献血后血肿不同治疗方法的临床治疗效果

Contrastive analysis of clinic treatment effects on haematoma after blood donation

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价